• Home
  • Practice Focus
    • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
    • Head and Neck
    • Laryngology
    • Otology/Neurotology
    • Pediatric
    • Rhinology
    • Sleep Medicine
    • How I Do It
    • TRIO Best Practices
  • Business of Medicine
    • Health Policy
    • Legal Matters
    • Practice Management
    • Technology
    • AI
  • Literature Reviews
    • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
    • Head and Neck
    • Laryngology
    • Otology/Neurotology
    • Pediatric
    • Rhinology
    • Sleep Medicine
  • Career
    • Medical Education
    • Professional Development
    • Resident Focus
  • ENT Perspectives
    • ENT Expressions
    • Everyday Ethics
    • From TRIO
    • The Great Debate
    • Letter From the Editor
    • Rx: Wellness
    • The Voice
    • Viewpoint
    • SUO Corner
  • TRIO Resources
    • Triological Society
    • The Laryngoscope
    • Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology
    • TRIO Combined Sections Meetings
    • COSM
    • Related Otolaryngology Events
  • Home
  • Practice Focus
    • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
    • Head and Neck
    • Laryngology
    • Otology/Neurotology
    • Pediatric
    • Rhinology
    • Sleep Medicine
    • How I Do It
    • TRIO Best Practices
  • Business of Medicine
    • Health Policy
    • Legal Matters
    • Practice Management
    • Technology
    • AI
  • Literature Reviews
    • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
    • Head and Neck
    • Laryngology
    • Otology/Neurotology
    • Pediatric
    • Rhinology
    • Sleep Medicine
  • Career
    • Medical Education
    • Professional Development
    • Resident Focus
  • ENT Perspectives
    • ENT Expressions
    • Everyday Ethics
    • From TRIO
    • The Great Debate
    • Letter From the Editor
    • Rx: Wellness
    • The Voice
    • Viewpoint
    • SUO Corner
  • TRIO Resources
    • Triological Society
    • The Laryngoscope
    • Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology
    • TRIO Combined Sections Meetings
    • COSM
    • Related Otolaryngology Events
  • Search

Bundled Payments for Patients with Head, Neck Cancer Launched at MD Anderson Cancer Center

by Richard Quinn • September 8, 2015

  • Tweet
  • Email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
Print-Friendly Version

A Slow Evolution

MD Anderson is a natural choice to launch a pilot program on bundled payments, because it is “an integrated practice,” Dr. Feeley said. “Our medical practice is integrated with our hospital and with our clinic,” he said. “When we receive payments from United, we don’t have to parse out payments within our system.”

You Might Also Like

  • How Tumor Boards Can Improve Care for Patients with Head, Neck Cancer
  • Head and Neck Cancer Patients Who Don’t Drink or Smoke Have Worse Outcomes
  • Head Neck Cancer Associated with Significant Incremental Increases in Annual Healthcare Expenditures
  • Patients in Head and Neck Cancer Trials Don’t Reflect Clinical Practice
Explore This Issue
September 2015

The bureaucratic hurdles of attributing cash flow and revenue would be obstacles to implementing a similar pilot program at other institutions, he said. And while, of course, there are other large “integrated medical centers that could launch their own initiatives,” Dr. Feeley doesn’t expect a raft of them anytime soon. “This is going to be a very, very slow evolution,” he said.

We’re hoping that in doing this all of our head and neck cancer [treatment] achieves the best outcomes at the lowest possible cost for all of the patients. —Thomas Feeley, MD

Launching MD Anderson’s pilot with head and neck cancer patients also makes logistical sense, Dr. Weber said. First, the number of patients is much smaller and more manageable than a program tailored to, say, breast or lung cancer. Second, the hospital has long operated using a multidisciplinary approach that makes communication easier for a program like this.

“For 30 years here, we’ve had a very integrated multidisciplinary team, so we all work very closely together,” he said. “We communicate very frequently about patients. We meet once a week at our tumor conferences. So bringing us together to engage in this project was perhaps easier.” Physician buy-in at MD Anderson was also pretty easy, Dr. Feeley said.

It’s also important to make sure that patients know that payment initiatives have zero impact on the quality and timeliness of the care delivered. To that end, physicians don’t know which patients are enrolled in the program and which ones aren’t. That allows doctors “to remain agnostic about that so that we just treat the patients the way we would normally treat them,” Dr. Weber said.

Dr. Feeley wants patients who have heard about the pilot program to understand it’s not about rationing care or trying to find cheaper alternatives. In fact, he is hopeful some of those patients might take comfort in knowing their care is being paid for in one lump sum. “Cancer patients in general get a ton of bills when they enter treatment,” he said. “I’m really hoping that, for the patient, this is one less source of anxiety while you’re being treated for head and neck cancer.”

Pages: 1 2 3 | Single Page

Filed Under: Departments, Health Policy Tagged With: bundled payment, cancer, insuranceIssue: September 2015

You Might Also Like:

  • How Tumor Boards Can Improve Care for Patients with Head, Neck Cancer
  • Head and Neck Cancer Patients Who Don’t Drink or Smoke Have Worse Outcomes
  • Head Neck Cancer Associated with Significant Incremental Increases in Annual Healthcare Expenditures
  • Patients in Head and Neck Cancer Trials Don’t Reflect Clinical Practice

The Triological SocietyENTtoday is a publication of The Triological Society.

Polls

Have you ever encountered a mentally or physically threatening patient or caregiver?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...
  • Polls Archive

Top Articles for Residents

  • Is the SLOR in Otolaryngology Residency Applications Contributing to Rural Disparities?
  • Applications Open for Resident Members of the ENTtoday Editorial Board: Deadline Extended
  • A Resident’s View of AI in Otolaryngology
  • Call for Resident Bowl Questions
  • Resident Pearls: Pediatric Otolaryngologists Share Tips for Safer, Smarter Tonsillectomies
  • Popular this Week
  • Most Popular
  • Most Recent
    • More Than Skin Deep: Building a Workforce Patients Can Trust
    • Office Laryngoscopy Is Not Aerosol Generating When Evaluated by Optical Particle Sizer
    • Some Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Resists PPI Treatment
    • Otolaryngologists Apply Safety Strategies When Treating Threatening Patients
    • The Dramatic Rise in Tongue Tie and Lip Tie Treatment
    • The Dramatic Rise in Tongue Tie and Lip Tie Treatment
    • Rating Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Severity: How Do Two Common Instruments Compare?
    • Is Middle Ear Pressure Affected by Continuous Positive Airway Pressure Use?
    • Otolaryngologists Are Still Debating the Effectiveness of Tongue Tie Treatment
    • Complications for When Physicians Change a Maiden Name
    • The Pursuit of Excellence—the Journey or the Gold
    • Is There Benefit of Music Training Following Cochlear Implantation?
    • Is Cognitive Behavioral Therapy Effective for Tinnitus?
    • Does Dupilumab Improve Sinonasal Outcomes in AERD Patients?
    • Making the Most of TRIO Meetings

Follow Us

  • Contact Us
  • About Us
  • Advertise
  • The Triological Society
  • The Laryngoscope
  • Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use
  • Cookies

Wiley

Copyright © 2026 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc. All rights reserved, including rights for text and data mining and training of artificial technologies or similar technologies. ISSN 1559-4939