• Home
  • Practice Focus
    • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
    • Head and Neck
    • Laryngology
    • Otology/Neurotology
    • Pediatric
    • Rhinology
    • Sleep Medicine
    • How I Do It
    • TRIO Best Practices
  • Business of Medicine
    • Health Policy
    • Legal Matters
    • Practice Management
    • Technology
    • AI
  • Literature Reviews
    • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
    • Head and Neck
    • Laryngology
    • Otology/Neurotology
    • Pediatric
    • Rhinology
    • Sleep Medicine
  • Career
    • Medical Education
    • Professional Development
    • Resident Focus
  • ENT Perspectives
    • ENT Expressions
    • Everyday Ethics
    • From TRIO
    • The Great Debate
    • Letter From the Editor
    • Rx: Wellness
    • The Voice
    • Viewpoint
    • SUO Corner
  • TRIO Resources
    • Triological Society
    • The Laryngoscope
    • Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology
    • TRIO Combined Sections Meetings
    • COSM
    • Related Otolaryngology Events
  • Home
  • Practice Focus
    • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
    • Head and Neck
    • Laryngology
    • Otology/Neurotology
    • Pediatric
    • Rhinology
    • Sleep Medicine
    • How I Do It
    • TRIO Best Practices
  • Business of Medicine
    • Health Policy
    • Legal Matters
    • Practice Management
    • Technology
    • AI
  • Literature Reviews
    • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
    • Head and Neck
    • Laryngology
    • Otology/Neurotology
    • Pediatric
    • Rhinology
    • Sleep Medicine
  • Career
    • Medical Education
    • Professional Development
    • Resident Focus
  • ENT Perspectives
    • ENT Expressions
    • Everyday Ethics
    • From TRIO
    • The Great Debate
    • Letter From the Editor
    • Rx: Wellness
    • The Voice
    • Viewpoint
    • SUO Corner
  • TRIO Resources
    • Triological Society
    • The Laryngoscope
    • Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology
    • TRIO Combined Sections Meetings
    • COSM
    • Related Otolaryngology Events
  • Search

Change Is Good, Right?

by Lisa Casinger • November 4, 2025

  • Tweet
  • Email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
Print-Friendly Version

Jonathan Bock, MD

You Might Also Like

  • Health Care Reform Tops Domestic Agenda in 2008 Presidential Race
  • Why Being Uninsured Makes Sense for Many Americans
  • Where Do the Presidential Candidates Stand on Health Care?
  • When Dealing with Insurers, Electronic Payment Tools May be an Otolaryngologist’s Best Friend
Explore This Issue
November 2025

Academic physician–scientist laryngologist at Otolaryngology Center for Advanced Care, Froedtert Hospital, and professor of otolaryngology at the Medical College of Wisconsin, both in Milwaukee

One of the biggest changes in my practice in the last 10 years has been the increased constant connection that patients now expect from their doctors through MyChart messaging and other virtual and phone contact mechanisms. The sheer number of messages we get daily that need to be addressed requires an entire team of nurses and adds significant time and effort to our daily work, and none of it is really reimbursed. There are some positives to this, as patients have easier access to their doctors and can do follow-up through messaging more easily, but the increased work for the care team is significant and not really considered at all in our pay/reimbursement.

The other real change is the utility of virtual visits and care for patients. Many choose these now for follow-up, wound checks, even initial consultations when they live far away from our academic center. It really facilitates care.

Travis Tate Tollefson, MD, MPH

Director and professor of facial plastic and reconstructive surgery at UC Davis, and co-director of the UC Davis cleft and craniofacial program in Sacramento, Calif.

When considering the biggest changes in my practice, I think of the change in patient care note writing.

I remember well the thick file folders of patient records in the clinic doors with written notes and the speed we could open to our last handwritten message that immediately reminded us of the patient’s story and priorities for care. Maybe similar to the often-described benefits of journal writing with a pen or pencil compared to typing out ideas, I long for the written note and the simplicity of a time when note writing was limited to the critical elements. Prior to our reactive compulsion with efficiency, coding, modifiers, and overall clicking to allow metadata to be tracked, we documented less, yet may have communicated more.

Amber Luong, MD, PhD

Professor of otorhinolaryngology–head and neck surgery and vice chair of academic affairs in the department of otorhinolaryngology–head and neck surgery at McGovern Medical School at UTHealth Houston in Texas

For rhinology, it is the introduction of biologics in the management of chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps. Patients who in the past would get multiple surgeries for their recurrent polyps are now being offered biologics.

Pages: 1 2 3 | Single Page

Filed Under: Business of Medicine, Home Slider, Practice Management Tagged With: changes in practiceIssue: November 2025

You Might Also Like:

  • Health Care Reform Tops Domestic Agenda in 2008 Presidential Race
  • Why Being Uninsured Makes Sense for Many Americans
  • Where Do the Presidential Candidates Stand on Health Care?
  • When Dealing with Insurers, Electronic Payment Tools May be an Otolaryngologist’s Best Friend

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

The Triological SocietyENTtoday is a publication of The Triological Society.

Polls

More and more medical trainees are taking dedicated, prolonged gap years. Did you?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...
  • Polls Archive

Top Articles for Residents

  • Is the SLOR in Otolaryngology Residency Applications Contributing to Rural Disparities?
  • Applications Open for Resident Members of the ENTtoday Editorial Board
  • A Resident’s View of AI in Otolaryngology
  • Call for Resident Bowl Questions
  • Resident Pearls: Pediatric Otolaryngologists Share Tips for Safer, Smarter Tonsillectomies
  • Popular this Week
  • Most Popular
  • Most Recent
    • Office Laryngoscopy Is Not Aerosol Generating When Evaluated by Optical Particle Sizer
    • Some Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Resists PPI Treatment
    • Cochlear Implants Improve Performance and Net Savings in Infants
    • Empty Nose Syndrome: Physiological, Psychological, or Perhaps a Little of Both?
    • Rating Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Severity: How Do Two Common Instruments Compare?
    • The Dramatic Rise in Tongue Tie and Lip Tie Treatment
    • Rating Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Severity: How Do Two Common Instruments Compare?
    • Is Middle Ear Pressure Affected by Continuous Positive Airway Pressure Use?
    • Otolaryngologists Are Still Debating the Effectiveness of Tongue Tie Treatment
    • Keeping Watch for Skin Cancers on the Head and Neck
    • Short-Term Efficacy of Biologics in Recalcitrant AFRS: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    • The Devaluation of Otolaryngology: An Evaluation of CMS’s Involvement in Physician Reimbursement
    • Embolized Middle Meningeal Artery as a Surgical Landmark in Infratemporal Fossa
    • Lord of the (Magnetic) Rings: Rigid Bronchoscopy for Aspirated Magnetic Foreign Bodies in Tertiary Bronchi
    • What Otolaryngologists Can Learn from Athletes

Follow Us

  • Contact Us
  • About Us
  • Advertise
  • The Triological Society
  • The Laryngoscope
  • Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use
  • Cookies

Wiley

Copyright © 2026 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc. All rights reserved, including rights for text and data mining and training of artificial technologies or similar technologies. ISSN 1559-4939