• Home
  • Practice Focus
    • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
    • Head and Neck
    • Laryngology
    • Otology/Neurotology
    • Pediatric
    • Rhinology
    • Sleep Medicine
    • How I Do It
    • TRIO Best Practices
  • Business of Medicine
    • Health Policy
    • Legal Matters
    • Practice Management
    • Tech Talk
    • AI
  • Literature Reviews
    • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
    • Head and Neck
    • Laryngology
    • Otology/Neurotology
    • Pediatric
    • Rhinology
    • Sleep Medicine
  • Career
    • Medical Education
    • Professional Development
    • Resident Focus
  • ENT Perspectives
    • ENT Expressions
    • Everyday Ethics
    • From TRIO
    • The Great Debate
    • Letter From the Editor
    • Rx: Wellness
    • The Voice
    • Viewpoint
  • TRIO Resources
    • Triological Society
    • The Laryngoscope
    • Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology
    • TRIO Combined Sections Meetings
    • COSM
    • Related Otolaryngology Events
  • Search

Chemoradiation vs. Surgery: Which is Better for Head and Neck Cancer?

by Pippa Wysong • April 1, 2006

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
Print-Friendly Version

While chemoradiation is becoming more common for managing head and neck cancers, some patients should have surgery as an initial treatment

You Might Also Like

  • Targeted Therapy a Potential Treatment for Head and Neck Cancer
  • Post-Chemoradiation of Head and Neck Cancer: SND and Aspiration
  • Selecting the Right Patients Is Key for Chemoradiation Success
  • PET Not Ready for Routine Management of Head and Neck Cancer
Explore This Issue
April 2006

TORONTO—There has been a paradigm shift in the management of oropharyngeal and laryngopharyngeal cancer, and top surgeons now opt more frequently for chemoradiation treatment than surgery. At the same time, otolaryngologists–head and neck surgeons need to do their best to determine which patients are not good chemoradiation candidates and should undergo surgery as a first modality.

These were among the key messages presented by a panel of five experts who discussed head and neck cancers at the recent meeting of the Eastern Section of the Triological Society here. The panel, moderated by Ashok Shaha, MD, Professor of Surgery at Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center in New York City, covered treatment options in response to a series of questions and sample cases presented.

Radiation Therapy: Good for Many Patients

Radiation therapy came out as top choice for the management of early vocal cord cancer, though panelists provided different reasons. It isn’t for all levels of cancer, and it doesn’t discount the value of other specific treatments.

Jeremy L. Freeman, MD, Professor of Otolaryngology at the University of Toronto in Ontario, explained that radiation is the treatment of choice at his center, in part, because there isn’t enough manpower for doing laser ablation. “We’d need one person dedicated to do this job two or three times a week, and we just don’t have this resource. We do have a radiation resource and that’s what we do.” He added that laser ablation is cost-effective, and that radiation can be used later on if there is a recurrence.

Gady Har-El, MD, Professor of Otolaryngology and Neurosurgery at SUNY Health Science Center in Brooklyn, NY, said it depends on the whether the cancer is T1 or T2 since they need different levels of aggression in treatment.

And, while radiation is often effective, it doesn’t work for everyone, a point made by Jonas Johnson, MD, Chair of Otolaryngology at the University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine (Pa.).

Figure. Drs. Ashok Shaha, Jeremy Freeman, Gady Har-El, Bert O'Malley, Jr., and Jonas Johnson (left to right) debated treatment options for head and neck cancer at the Triological Society Eastern Section meeting.

click for large version
Figure. Drs. Ashok Shaha, Jeremy Freeman, Gady Har-El, Bert O’Malley, Jr., and Jonas Johnson (left to right) debated treatment options for head and neck cancer at the Triological Society Eastern Section meeting.

“The best data suggest 70% of patients with T2 laryngeal cancer are cured with radiation, which means a 30% failure rate. If those [failed] patients are carefully followed, they can often be treated with partial laryngeal surgery.” However, if patients are not followed carefully, 30% of the failed patients lose their larynx, which is “an abomination,” Dr. Johnson said.

Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 | Single Page

Filed Under: Departments, Head and Neck, Laryngology, Medical Education, Practice Focus Tagged With: cancer, carcinoma, debate, laryngectomy, outcomes, patient safety, radiation, surgery, thyroid cancer, treatment, tumorIssue: April 2006

You Might Also Like:

  • Targeted Therapy a Potential Treatment for Head and Neck Cancer
  • Post-Chemoradiation of Head and Neck Cancer: SND and Aspiration
  • Selecting the Right Patients Is Key for Chemoradiation Success
  • PET Not Ready for Routine Management of Head and Neck Cancer

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

The Triological SocietyENTtoday is a publication of The Triological Society.

Polls

Would you choose a concierge physician as your PCP?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...
  • Polls Archive

Top Articles for Residents

  • Applications Open for Resident Members of ENTtoday Edit Board
  • How To Provide Helpful Feedback To Residents
  • Call for Resident Bowl Questions
  • New Standardized Otolaryngology Curriculum Launching July 1 Should Be Valuable Resource For Physicians Around The World
  • Do Training Programs Give Otolaryngology Residents the Necessary Tools to Do Productive Research?
  • Popular this Week
  • Most Popular
  • Most Recent
    • A Journey Through Pay Inequity: A Physician’s Firsthand Account

    • The Dramatic Rise in Tongue Tie and Lip Tie Treatment

    • Otolaryngologists Are Still Debating the Effectiveness of Tongue Tie Treatment

    • Is Middle Ear Pressure Affected by Continuous Positive Airway Pressure Use?

    • Rating Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Severity: How Do Two Common Instruments Compare?

    • The Dramatic Rise in Tongue Tie and Lip Tie Treatment

    • Rating Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Severity: How Do Two Common Instruments Compare?

    • Is Middle Ear Pressure Affected by Continuous Positive Airway Pressure Use?

    • Otolaryngologists Are Still Debating the Effectiveness of Tongue Tie Treatment

    • Complications for When Physicians Change a Maiden Name

    • Excitement Around Gene Therapy for Hearing Restoration
    • “Small” Acts of Kindness
    • How To: Endoscopic Total Maxillectomy Without Facial Skin Incision
    • Science Communities Must Speak Out When Policies Threaten Health and Safety
    • Observation Most Cost-Effective in Addressing AECRS in Absence of Bacterial Infection

Follow Us

  • Contact Us
  • About Us
  • Advertise
  • The Triological Society
  • The Laryngoscope
  • Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use
  • Cookies

Wiley

Copyright © 2025 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc. All rights reserved, including rights for text and data mining and training of artificial technologies or similar technologies. ISSN 1559-4939