• Home
  • Practice Focus
    • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
    • Head and Neck
    • Laryngology
    • Otology/Neurotology
    • Pediatric
    • Rhinology
    • Sleep Medicine
    • How I Do It
    • TRIO Best Practices
  • Business of Medicine
    • Health Policy
    • Legal Matters
    • Practice Management
    • Tech Talk
    • AI
  • Literature Reviews
    • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
    • Head and Neck
    • Laryngology
    • Otology/Neurotology
    • Pediatric
    • Rhinology
    • Sleep Medicine
  • Career
    • Medical Education
    • Professional Development
    • Resident Focus
  • ENT Perspectives
    • ENT Expressions
    • Everyday Ethics
    • From TRIO
    • The Great Debate
    • Letter From the Editor
    • Rx: Wellness
    • The Voice
    • Viewpoint
  • TRIO Resources
    • Triological Society
    • The Laryngoscope
    • Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology
    • TRIO Combined Sections Meetings
    • COSM
    • Related Otolaryngology Events
  • Search

Cincinnati Criteria Identifies More Cases of Enlarged Vestibular Aqueduct

by Gerard Gianoli, MD • March 1, 2010

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
Print-Friendly Version

Are otolaryngologists underdiagnosing EVA?

Background: Enlarged vestibular aqueduct (EVA) is the most commonly identified CT scan anomaly found in children with sensorineural hearing loss (SNHL). Current radiographic criteria for EVA (defined by Valvassori and Clemis in 1978, using hypocycloidal polytomography), is a vestibular aqueduct larger than 1.5 mm at the midpoint. A new criteria, the Cincinnati criteria (proposed by Boston and colleagues), based on CT scan and statistical analysis, defined EVA as ≥1.0 mm at the midpoint or ≥2.0 mm at the operculum.

You Might Also Like

  • Should Children with an Enlarged Vestibular Aqueduct Be Restricted from Contact Sports?
  • What Is the Best Imaging Modality for Diagnosing a Large Vestibular Aqueduct?
  • MRI, CT Beneficial for Pediatric Sensorineural Hearing Loss
  • MRI, CT Imaging Beneficial for Pediatric Sensorineural Hearing Loss
Explore This Issue
March 2010

Study Design: Cohort study, retrospective review. This study represents the largest CT-based assessment of vestibular aqueducts ever published.

Setting: One hundred thirty cochlear implant recipients at St. Louis Children’s Hospital

Synopsis: Of 163 patients who underwent cochlear implantation at St. Louis Children’s Hospital between January 2003 and August 2007, 242 ears (130 patients) were included for review. Measurements of the vestibular aqueduct were performed at the midpoint and at the operculum at an angle of 90 degrees from the posterior wall of the petrous bone. EVA was identified using both the Valvassori criteria and the Cincinnati criteria. The Cincinnati criteria diagnosed 44 percent of patients with EVA, compared to 16 percent with the Valvassori criteria. The Cincinnati criteria were more likely than the Valvassori criteria to diagnose bilateral EVA (45 percent vs. 36 percent). Among the 70 ears defined as EVA by the Cincinnati criteria but judged normal by the Valvassori criteria, 59 had no other reason for their hearing loss.

Bottom Line: This study supports the Cincinnati criteria for the identification of EVA in children with SNHL. The Valvassori and Clemis criteria, based on older technology, likely underdiagnose EVA.

Citation: Dewan K, Wippold FJ II, Lieu JE. Enlarged vestibular aqueduct in pediatric sensorineural hearing loss. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2009;140(4):552-558.

Filed Under: Literature Reviews, Otology/Neurotology, Otology/Neurotology, Pediatric, Pediatric, Practice Focus Tagged With: cochlear implant, EVAIssue: March 2010

You Might Also Like:

  • Should Children with an Enlarged Vestibular Aqueduct Be Restricted from Contact Sports?
  • What Is the Best Imaging Modality for Diagnosing a Large Vestibular Aqueduct?
  • MRI, CT Beneficial for Pediatric Sensorineural Hearing Loss
  • MRI, CT Imaging Beneficial for Pediatric Sensorineural Hearing Loss

The Triological SocietyENTtoday is a publication of The Triological Society.

Polls

Have you invented or patented something that betters the field of otolaryngology?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...
  • Polls Archive

Top Articles for Residents

  • Applications Open for Resident Members of ENTtoday Edit Board
  • How To Provide Helpful Feedback To Residents
  • Call for Resident Bowl Questions
  • New Standardized Otolaryngology Curriculum Launching July 1 Should Be Valuable Resource For Physicians Around The World
  • Do Training Programs Give Otolaryngology Residents the Necessary Tools to Do Productive Research?
  • Popular this Week
  • Most Popular
  • Most Recent
    • The Dramatic Rise in Tongue Tie and Lip Tie Treatment

    • Otolaryngologists as Entrepreneurs: Transforming Patient Care And Practice

    • Otolaryngologists Are Still Debating the Effectiveness of Tongue Tie Treatment

    • Continued Discussion And Engagement Are Essential To How Otolaryngologists Are Championing DEI Initiatives In Medicine

    • Rating Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Severity: How Do Two Common Instruments Compare?

    • The Dramatic Rise in Tongue Tie and Lip Tie Treatment

    • Rating Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Severity: How Do Two Common Instruments Compare?

    • Is Middle Ear Pressure Affected by Continuous Positive Airway Pressure Use?

    • Otolaryngologists Are Still Debating the Effectiveness of Tongue Tie Treatment

    • Complications for When Physicians Change a Maiden Name

    • Leaky Pipes—Time to Focus on Our Foundations
    • You Are Among Friends: The Value Of Being In A Group
    • How To: Full Endoscopic Procedures of Total Parotidectomy
    • How To: Does Intralesional Steroid Injection Effectively Mitigate Vocal Fold Scarring in a Rabbit Model?
    • What Is the Optimal Anticoagulation in HGNS Surgery in Patients with High-Risk Cardiac Comorbidities?

Follow Us

  • Contact Us
  • About Us
  • Advertise
  • The Triological Society
  • The Laryngoscope
  • Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use
  • Cookies

Wiley

Copyright © 2025 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc. All rights reserved, including rights for text and data mining and training of artificial technologies or similar technologies. ISSN 1559-4939