• Home
  • Practice Focus
    • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
    • Head and Neck
    • Laryngology
    • Otology/Neurotology
    • Pediatric
    • Rhinology
    • Sleep Medicine
    • How I Do It
    • TRIO Best Practices
  • Business of Medicine
    • Health Policy
    • Legal Matters
    • Practice Management
    • Tech Talk
    • AI
  • Literature Reviews
    • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
    • Head and Neck
    • Laryngology
    • Otology/Neurotology
    • Pediatric
    • Rhinology
    • Sleep Medicine
  • Career
    • Medical Education
    • Professional Development
    • Resident Focus
  • ENT Perspectives
    • ENT Expressions
    • Everyday Ethics
    • From TRIO
    • The Great Debate
    • Letter From the Editor
    • Rx: Wellness
    • The Voice
    • Viewpoint
  • TRIO Resources
    • Triological Society
    • The Laryngoscope
    • Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology
    • TRIO Combined Sections Meetings
    • COSM
    • Related Otolaryngology Events
  • Search

CMS Reimburses Sleep Apnea CPAP Treatment When Diagnosed with Home Testing

by Heather Lindsey • July 1, 2008

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
Print-Friendly Version

Note: Dr. Collop has an NIH Small Business Innovation Research (SBIR) Grant with CleveMed, a company that makes a wireless PSG product, which might be considered for home monitoring. The device is currently being used in the hospital, not the home.

You Might Also Like

  • Incorporating Home Sleep Studies into the Diagnostic and Treatment Armamentarium
  • Shift in Diagnosis, Treatment of Obstructive Sleep Apnea A Challenge for Otolaryngologists
  • Testing Recommendation for Children with Sleep-Disordered Breathing
  • At-Home Sleep Studies Less Expensive but Less Accurate
Explore This Issue
July 2008

On March 13, the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) ruled that it would reimburse continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) treatment if diagnosed with a clinical evaluation and a positive result from an unattended home monitoring device. Prior to this date, CMS covered CPAP only if sleep apnea was diagnosed in a sleep laboratory with polysomnography (PSG).

CMS examined whether patients had a change in health outcomes based on the type of sleep testing they received, and did not find a difference between home monitoring and PSG, said Terence Davidson, MD, Professor of Surgery in the Division of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery and Director of the Sleep Center at the University of California at San Diego.

The American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery (AAO-HNS) petitioned CMS in January 2007 to consider payment for CPAP diagnosed with home testing, and many academy members participated in the CMS review process during the following year.

Even as Dr. Davidson described the new ruling as an excellent decision, several questions and concerns remain, according to other experts interviewed for this article.

Immediate Implications for Patients and Physicians

Terence M. Davidson, MD

Terence M. Davidson, MD

Because sleep apnea is a common problem, physicians need to move toward paradigms in which they quickly, efficiently, and inexpensively diagnose and get people on treatment, said Dr. Davidson. The CMS ruling was an important first step toward doing this, he explained.

The ruling will mean better access to sleep apnea testing for patients and an alternative to undergoing PSG in a sleep center, said Pell Ann Wardrop, MD, an otolaryngologist and sleep medicine specialist at Wardrop Medical Services, PLLC, in Lexington, KY.

Additionally, some otolaryngologists who view sleep disorders as a substantial part of their practice may decide to purchase home testing devices to diagnose sleep apnea, said Dr. Davidson. Many pulmonary physicians and even sleep physicians will also incorporate this technology into their practices, he said.

Those otolaryngologists and other physicians who choose to invest in the machines will need to designate office personnel to educate patients about home testing, said Dr. Davidson. Home sleep testing is simple, but not trivial, he said. It’s not like you buy a machine and every once in a while get it out and give it to the patient.

Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 | Single Page

Filed Under: Departments, Health Policy, Medical Education, Practice Focus, Sleep Medicine Tagged With: diagnosis, healthcare reform, Medicare, policy, polysomnography, reimbursement, sleep apnea, testingIssue: July 2008

You Might Also Like:

  • Incorporating Home Sleep Studies into the Diagnostic and Treatment Armamentarium
  • Shift in Diagnosis, Treatment of Obstructive Sleep Apnea A Challenge for Otolaryngologists
  • Testing Recommendation for Children with Sleep-Disordered Breathing
  • At-Home Sleep Studies Less Expensive but Less Accurate

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

The Triological SocietyENTtoday is a publication of The Triological Society.

Polls

Would you choose a concierge physician as your PCP?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...
  • Polls Archive

Top Articles for Residents

  • Applications Open for Resident Members of ENTtoday Edit Board
  • How To Provide Helpful Feedback To Residents
  • Call for Resident Bowl Questions
  • New Standardized Otolaryngology Curriculum Launching July 1 Should Be Valuable Resource For Physicians Around The World
  • Do Training Programs Give Otolaryngology Residents the Necessary Tools to Do Productive Research?
  • Popular this Week
  • Most Popular
  • Most Recent
    • A Journey Through Pay Inequity: A Physician’s Firsthand Account

    • The Dramatic Rise in Tongue Tie and Lip Tie Treatment

    • Otolaryngologists Are Still Debating the Effectiveness of Tongue Tie Treatment

    • Is Middle Ear Pressure Affected by Continuous Positive Airway Pressure Use?

    • Rating Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Severity: How Do Two Common Instruments Compare?

    • The Dramatic Rise in Tongue Tie and Lip Tie Treatment

    • Rating Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Severity: How Do Two Common Instruments Compare?

    • Is Middle Ear Pressure Affected by Continuous Positive Airway Pressure Use?

    • Otolaryngologists Are Still Debating the Effectiveness of Tongue Tie Treatment

    • Complications for When Physicians Change a Maiden Name

    • Excitement Around Gene Therapy for Hearing Restoration
    • “Small” Acts of Kindness
    • How To: Endoscopic Total Maxillectomy Without Facial Skin Incision
    • Science Communities Must Speak Out When Policies Threaten Health and Safety
    • Observation Most Cost-Effective in Addressing AECRS in Absence of Bacterial Infection

Follow Us

  • Contact Us
  • About Us
  • Advertise
  • The Triological Society
  • The Laryngoscope
  • Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use
  • Cookies

Wiley

Copyright © 2025 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc. All rights reserved, including rights for text and data mining and training of artificial technologies or similar technologies. ISSN 1559-4939