• Home
  • Practice Focus
    • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
    • Head and Neck
    • Laryngology
    • Otology/Neurotology
    • Pediatric
    • Rhinology
    • Sleep Medicine
    • How I Do It
    • TRIO Best Practices
  • Business of Medicine
    • Health Policy
    • Legal Matters
    • Practice Management
    • Tech Talk
    • AI
  • Literature Reviews
    • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
    • Head and Neck
    • Laryngology
    • Otology/Neurotology
    • Pediatric
    • Rhinology
    • Sleep Medicine
  • Career
    • Medical Education
    • Professional Development
    • Resident Focus
  • ENT Perspectives
    • ENT Expressions
    • Everyday Ethics
    • From TRIO
    • The Great Debate
    • Letter From the Editor
    • Rx: Wellness
    • The Voice
    • Viewpoint
  • TRIO Resources
    • Triological Society
    • The Laryngoscope
    • Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology
    • TRIO Combined Sections Meetings
    • COSM
    • Related Otolaryngology Events
  • Search

Cochlear Implant Surgery: How Young Is Too Young?

by David Bronstein • August 9, 2012

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
Print-Friendly Version

“Can you implant children at 10 or 11 months of age? Sure—we do it and consistently achieve very acceptable results. But I don’t know of any other group, other than Dr. Colletti’s, [that] has shown that this procedure works in younger children,” said Dr. Gantz. “For me, if the child is not old enough to [undergo] a behavioral audiogram, I’m not even going to consider that patient to be a viable candidate for CI surgery.”

You Might Also Like

  • New Cochlear Implant Improves Hearing in Subset of Patients
  • Best Timing for Second Implant in Pediatric Bilateral Cochlear Implantation
  • Cochlear Implants Improve Performance and Net Savings in Infants
  • Milestones in Development of Cochlear Implant Technology
Explore This Issue
August 2012

In the case of residual hearing, Dr. Colletti agreed “that a standard implant can destroy residual hearing in this population.” To protect against that outcome, “we performed routine intraoperative ECoG in all children during CI surgery,” he added.

For Dr. Papsin, there is one instance where patients younger than six months of age often receive a cochlear implant—in cases of post-meningitic deafness, “where the potential risks of intracochlear ossification drives us to operate early,” he said. But without that particular history of infectious disease, “I certainly would not let my child undergo an elective operation based on this low-level data.”

Disclosures: Dr. Papsin is a member of the Speakers Bureau of Cochlear Americas Corp., and Dr. Gantz is a consultant for Cochlear Corporation and Advanced Bionics.

Pages: 1 2 3 4 | Single Page

Filed Under: Otology/Neurotology, Pediatric, Practice Focus Tagged With: cochlear implant, infant, Otology, pediatric, research, surgeryIssue: August 2012

You Might Also Like:

  • New Cochlear Implant Improves Hearing in Subset of Patients
  • Best Timing for Second Implant in Pediatric Bilateral Cochlear Implantation
  • Cochlear Implants Improve Performance and Net Savings in Infants
  • Milestones in Development of Cochlear Implant Technology

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

The Triological SocietyENTtoday is a publication of The Triological Society.

Polls

Have you served as an expert witness in a case that’s gone to trial?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...
  • Polls Archive

Top Articles for Residents

  • Resident Pearls: Pediatric Otolaryngologists Share Tips for Safer, Smarter Tonsillectomies
  • A Letter to My Younger Self: Making Deliberate Changes Can Help Improve the Sense of Belonging
  • ENTtoday Welcomes Resident Editorial Board Members
  • Applications Open for Resident Members of ENTtoday Edit Board
  • How To Provide Helpful Feedback To Residents
  • Popular this Week
  • Most Popular
  • Most Recent
    • The Dramatic Rise in Tongue Tie and Lip Tie Treatment

    • Empty Nose Syndrome: Physiological, Psychological, or Perhaps a Little of Both?

    • Rating Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Severity: How Do Two Common Instruments Compare?

    • Office Laryngoscopy Is Not Aerosol Generating When Evaluated by Optical Particle Sizer

    • Otolaryngologists Are Still Debating the Effectiveness of Tongue Tie Treatment

    • The Dramatic Rise in Tongue Tie and Lip Tie Treatment

    • Rating Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Severity: How Do Two Common Instruments Compare?

    • Is Middle Ear Pressure Affected by Continuous Positive Airway Pressure Use?

    • Otolaryngologists Are Still Debating the Effectiveness of Tongue Tie Treatment

    • Keeping Watch for Skin Cancers on the Head and Neck

    • Resident Pearls: Pediatric Otolaryngologists Share Tips for Safer, Smarter Tonsillectomies
    • Composition and Priorities of Multidisciplinary Pediatric Thyroid Programs: A Consensus Statement
    • Artificial Intelligence as Author: Can Scientific Reviewers Recognize GPT- 4o–Generated Manuscripts?
    • Self-Administered Taste Testing Without Water: Normative Data for the 53-Item WETT
    • Long-Term Particulate Matter Exposure May Increase Risk of Chronic Rhinosinusitis with Nasal Polyposis: Results from an Exposure-Matched Study

Follow Us

  • Contact Us
  • About Us
  • Advertise
  • The Triological Society
  • The Laryngoscope
  • Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use
  • Cookies

Wiley

Copyright © 2025 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc. All rights reserved, including rights for text and data mining and training of artificial technologies or similar technologies. ISSN 1559-4939