• Home
  • Practice Focus
    • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
    • Head and Neck
    • Laryngology
    • Otology/Neurotology
    • Pediatric
    • Rhinology
    • Sleep Medicine
    • How I Do It
    • TRIO Best Practices
  • Business of Medicine
    • Health Policy
    • Legal Matters
    • Practice Management
    • Technology
    • AI
  • Literature Reviews
    • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
    • Head and Neck
    • Laryngology
    • Otology/Neurotology
    • Pediatric
    • Rhinology
    • Sleep Medicine
  • Career
    • Medical Education
    • Professional Development
    • Resident Focus
  • ENT Perspectives
    • ENT Expressions
    • Everyday Ethics
    • From TRIO
    • The Great Debate
    • Letter From the Editor
    • Rx: Wellness
    • The Voice
    • Viewpoint
    • SUO Corner
  • TRIO Resources
    • Triological Society
    • The Laryngoscope
    • Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology
    • TRIO Combined Sections Meetings
    • COSM
    • Related Otolaryngology Events
  • Home
  • Practice Focus
    • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
    • Head and Neck
    • Laryngology
    • Otology/Neurotology
    • Pediatric
    • Rhinology
    • Sleep Medicine
    • How I Do It
    • TRIO Best Practices
  • Business of Medicine
    • Health Policy
    • Legal Matters
    • Practice Management
    • Technology
    • AI
  • Literature Reviews
    • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
    • Head and Neck
    • Laryngology
    • Otology/Neurotology
    • Pediatric
    • Rhinology
    • Sleep Medicine
  • Career
    • Medical Education
    • Professional Development
    • Resident Focus
  • ENT Perspectives
    • ENT Expressions
    • Everyday Ethics
    • From TRIO
    • The Great Debate
    • Letter From the Editor
    • Rx: Wellness
    • The Voice
    • Viewpoint
    • SUO Corner
  • TRIO Resources
    • Triological Society
    • The Laryngoscope
    • Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology
    • TRIO Combined Sections Meetings
    • COSM
    • Related Otolaryngology Events
  • Search

Communicating with Patients and Staff via Electronic Office Communication Systems

by Sattinger, Andrea M. • January 1, 2007

  • Tweet
  • Email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
Print-Friendly Version

What are the costs of implementing an electronic system? It depends largely on the user base and the level of sophistication, said Mr. Smaistrla. Depending on one’s practice management system, EMR, or existing IT hardware, the costs may be extremely small. In our setting, we spent $15,000 for software and hardware improvements, which was quite affordable. This amounted to about $10,000 for the software and $5,000 for a hardware-based virtual private network (VPN) device. If you have to add a network server, costs will jump even more.

You Might Also Like

  • HIPAA Privacy and Security Standards for the Electronic Office
  • Electronic Health Records: The National Perspective
  • Implementing an Electronic Medical Records System-You Can Do It
  • Compliance Made Easy: High-tech systems remind patients to take their meds
Explore This Issue
January 2007

Advice for Newcomers to EMR

Bradley F. Marple, MD

Bradley F. Marple, MD

According to an analysis of the medical literature, as of 2005, only one in four medical practices were using EMR systems in the United States.1,2,3 What would our interviewees advise their colleagues about getting on the bandwagon with EMR? I would be very wary about just asking somebody else about it, said Dr. Marple, and I would certainly shop around and get several bids.

Perhaps the best and most cost-effective way to start up with EMR, and that which would be the best investment of time and resources, would be to consult an expert who can ask you about your needs and desires of the practice and the practitioners, and can begin to educate you about what to look for and the product variables from which to choose.

Go slowly is the best tip I can offer, said Mr. Smaistrla, and leverage existing systems to their capacity. When we had sufficient controls in place for less strict EMR messaging in place, we then added office email using an exchange server. We then extended remote access for a VPN and this stretched capacity even more.

If you are looking into implementing a system, examine the matter of checks and balances so no automatic default transmissions will oppose what you would want to happen, said Dr. Marple. You need to think of all the worst-case scenarios.

References

  1. Jha AK, Ferris TG, Donelan K, et al. How common are electronic health records in the United States? A summary of the evidence. Health Aff Web exclusive, October 11, 2006.

    [Context Link]

  2. Kane B, Sands DZ. Guidelines for the clinical use of electronic mail with patients. J Am Med Inform Assoc 1998;5:104-111.

    [Context Link]

  3. Waldren SE, Kibbe DC. Email in clinical care. BMJ 2004;329:E325-E326.

    [Context Link]

©2007 The Triological Society

Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 | Single Page

Filed Under: Articles, Features, Tech Talk Issue: January 2007

You Might Also Like:

  • HIPAA Privacy and Security Standards for the Electronic Office
  • Electronic Health Records: The National Perspective
  • Implementing an Electronic Medical Records System-You Can Do It
  • Compliance Made Easy: High-tech systems remind patients to take their meds

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

The Triological SocietyENTtoday is a publication of The Triological Society.

Polls

More and more medical trainees are taking dedicated, prolonged gap years. Did you?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...
  • Polls Archive

Top Articles for Residents

  • Is the SLOR in Otolaryngology Residency Applications Contributing to Rural Disparities?
  • Applications Open for Resident Members of the ENTtoday Editorial Board
  • A Resident’s View of AI in Otolaryngology
  • Call for Resident Bowl Questions
  • Resident Pearls: Pediatric Otolaryngologists Share Tips for Safer, Smarter Tonsillectomies
  • Popular this Week
  • Most Popular
  • Most Recent
    • Office Laryngoscopy Is Not Aerosol Generating When Evaluated by Optical Particle Sizer
    • Some Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Resists PPI Treatment
    • Cochlear Implants Improve Performance and Net Savings in Infants
    • Empty Nose Syndrome: Physiological, Psychological, or Perhaps a Little of Both?
    • Rating Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Severity: How Do Two Common Instruments Compare?
    • The Dramatic Rise in Tongue Tie and Lip Tie Treatment
    • Rating Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Severity: How Do Two Common Instruments Compare?
    • Is Middle Ear Pressure Affected by Continuous Positive Airway Pressure Use?
    • Otolaryngologists Are Still Debating the Effectiveness of Tongue Tie Treatment
    • Keeping Watch for Skin Cancers on the Head and Neck
    • Short-Term Efficacy of Biologics in Recalcitrant AFRS: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    • The Devaluation of Otolaryngology: An Evaluation of CMS’s Involvement in Physician Reimbursement
    • Embolized Middle Meningeal Artery as a Surgical Landmark in Infratemporal Fossa
    • Lord of the (Magnetic) Rings: Rigid Bronchoscopy for Aspirated Magnetic Foreign Bodies in Tertiary Bronchi
    • What Otolaryngologists Can Learn from Athletes

Follow Us

  • Contact Us
  • About Us
  • Advertise
  • The Triological Society
  • The Laryngoscope
  • Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use
  • Cookies

Wiley

Copyright © 2026 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc. All rights reserved, including rights for text and data mining and training of artificial technologies or similar technologies. ISSN 1559-4939