• Home
  • Practice Focus
    • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
    • Head and Neck
    • Laryngology
    • Otology/Neurotology
    • Pediatric
    • Rhinology
    • Sleep Medicine
    • How I Do It
    • TRIO Best Practices
  • Business of Medicine
    • Health Policy
    • Legal Matters
    • Practice Management
    • Tech Talk
    • AI
  • Literature Reviews
    • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
    • Head and Neck
    • Laryngology
    • Otology/Neurotology
    • Pediatric
    • Rhinology
    • Sleep Medicine
  • Career
    • Medical Education
    • Professional Development
    • Resident Focus
  • ENT Perspectives
    • ENT Expressions
    • Everyday Ethics
    • From TRIO
    • The Great Debate
    • Letter From the Editor
    • Rx: Wellness
    • The Voice
    • Viewpoint
  • TRIO Resources
    • Triological Society
    • The Laryngoscope
    • Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology
    • TRIO Combined Sections Meetings
    • COSM
    • Related Otolaryngology Events
  • Search

Computer Technology Boosts Rhinologic Surgery, but Poses Choices for Surgeons

by Thomas R. Collins • June 1, 2009

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
Print-Friendly Version

That technology will also allow surgeons to mark certain parts of the sinus anatomy so that surgeons, while performing procedures, can be alerted that they are getting close to sensitive areas.

You Might Also Like

  • Revision Sinus Surgery Poses Unique Challenges
  • Current Controversies in Rhinologic Surgery
  • Understanding Use of Image Guidance Technology in Endoscopic Sinus Surgery
  • Image Guidance: A Useful Adjunct to Endoscopic Sinus Surgery
Explore This Issue
June 2009

When you take them back into the operating room, as you do in your car navigation system, as you’re approaching the optic nerve, this will start beeping and say, ‘Approaching optic nerve,’ because you’ve already marked it, Dr. Fried said.

I do believe that within five or ten years, you’re going to be seeing this integration of where we’re going to take navigation to the next step.

Choosing the Right System

Dr. Tami took on a topic that might lead to confusion for some surgeons: how to choose an image guidance system in the first place.

He said there are three systems that use infrared technology: the Medtronics LandmarX, BrainLAB’s Kolibri and Vector-Vision, and Stryker Navigation’s iNtellect.

And there are two main systems that use electromagnetic technology: the Medtronics Fusion and the General Electric InstaTrak.

I don’t think there’s a bad system. I don’t think that you can go wrong and say, ‘Oh my God, I got this one and I should have gotten the other one,’ because they’ll all function, Dr. Tami said. It’s a matter of getting used to it.

The advantages of infrared technology are that there is no interference from metallic instruments or from the operating room table, the systems are widely available with a good track record of usage, and they are easily adaptable to multiple instruments. A disadvantage is that the line of sight can be limited by the infrared camera.

For the electromagnetic systems, an advantage is that there are no problems with the line of sight. But a major disadvantage is that it uses wired instruments and there can be electromagnetic metallic interference.

All the systems can use MRI, CT, and PET images; can track several instruments at a time; register patients easily; are highly accurate; are portable; offer multiple views; and all cost about the same.

It depends on who your dealer is, who your rep is, what kind of deal you have with them, but about $100,000 is the range for most of these systems, Dr. Tami said. Some are a little less, some are a little more, but they’re all pretty much in the same ballpark.

Considering all the similarities, which system to buy really depends on the support the surgeon will have once he or she gets it. You need to be able to depend on who you are buying the system from, who’s going to be there servicing it, help you when there are problems, he said.

Pages: 1 2 3 4 | Single Page

Filed Under: Everyday Ethics, Head and Neck, Practice Management, Rhinology, Tech Talk Tagged With: head and neck surgery, patient safety, rhinologyIssue: June 2009

You Might Also Like:

  • Revision Sinus Surgery Poses Unique Challenges
  • Current Controversies in Rhinologic Surgery
  • Understanding Use of Image Guidance Technology in Endoscopic Sinus Surgery
  • Image Guidance: A Useful Adjunct to Endoscopic Sinus Surgery

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

The Triological SocietyENTtoday is a publication of The Triological Society.

Polls

Would you choose a concierge physician as your PCP?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...
  • Polls Archive

Top Articles for Residents

  • Applications Open for Resident Members of ENTtoday Edit Board
  • How To Provide Helpful Feedback To Residents
  • Call for Resident Bowl Questions
  • New Standardized Otolaryngology Curriculum Launching July 1 Should Be Valuable Resource For Physicians Around The World
  • Do Training Programs Give Otolaryngology Residents the Necessary Tools to Do Productive Research?
  • Popular this Week
  • Most Popular
  • Most Recent
    • A Journey Through Pay Inequity: A Physician’s Firsthand Account

    • The Dramatic Rise in Tongue Tie and Lip Tie Treatment

    • Otolaryngologists Are Still Debating the Effectiveness of Tongue Tie Treatment

    • Is Middle Ear Pressure Affected by Continuous Positive Airway Pressure Use?

    • Rating Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Severity: How Do Two Common Instruments Compare?

    • The Dramatic Rise in Tongue Tie and Lip Tie Treatment

    • Rating Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Severity: How Do Two Common Instruments Compare?

    • Is Middle Ear Pressure Affected by Continuous Positive Airway Pressure Use?

    • Otolaryngologists Are Still Debating the Effectiveness of Tongue Tie Treatment

    • Complications for When Physicians Change a Maiden Name

    • Excitement Around Gene Therapy for Hearing Restoration
    • “Small” Acts of Kindness
    • How To: Endoscopic Total Maxillectomy Without Facial Skin Incision
    • Science Communities Must Speak Out When Policies Threaten Health and Safety
    • Observation Most Cost-Effective in Addressing AECRS in Absence of Bacterial Infection

Follow Us

  • Contact Us
  • About Us
  • Advertise
  • The Triological Society
  • The Laryngoscope
  • Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use
  • Cookies

Wiley

Copyright © 2025 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc. All rights reserved, including rights for text and data mining and training of artificial technologies or similar technologies. ISSN 1559-4939