• Home
  • Practice Focus
    • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
    • Head and Neck
    • Laryngology
    • Otology/Neurotology
    • Pediatric
    • Rhinology
    • Sleep Medicine
    • How I Do It
    • TRIO Best Practices
  • Business of Medicine
    • Health Policy
    • Legal Matters
    • Practice Management
    • Tech Talk
    • AI
  • Literature Reviews
    • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
    • Head and Neck
    • Laryngology
    • Otology/Neurotology
    • Pediatric
    • Rhinology
    • Sleep Medicine
  • Career
    • Medical Education
    • Professional Development
    • Resident Focus
  • ENT Perspectives
    • ENT Expressions
    • Everyday Ethics
    • From TRIO
    • The Great Debate
    • Letter From the Editor
    • Rx: Wellness
    • The Voice
    • Viewpoint
  • TRIO Resources
    • Triological Society
    • The Laryngoscope
    • Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology
    • TRIO Combined Sections Meetings
    • COSM
    • Related Otolaryngology Events
  • Search

Considering Tonsillectomy? Factor in Evidence, Clinical Judgment, Patient Preference

by Henkel, Gretchen • December 1, 2009

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
Print-Friendly Version

SAN DIEGO-Weighing whether or not to perform tonsillectomy boils down to a balance between benefit and harm, declared Richard Rosenfeld, MD, MPH, at the lively and well-attended miniseminar on evidence-based tonsillectomy at the American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery annual meeting here.

You Might Also Like

  • Clinical Judgment: Balancing Evidence-Based Medicine and Patient Self-Determination
  • Powered Intracapsular Tonsillectomy Is a Safe Alternative to Traditional Tonsillectomy
  • Tonsillectomy Revisited: New guidelines represent a clinical shift for some otolaryngologists
  • Is Partial Tonsillectomy Equivalent to Total Tonsillectomy for Obstructive Symptoms?
Explore This Issue
December 2009

The session was designed to help guide otolaryngologists in their decision-making. Even though the surgery is still commonly performed, Dr. Rosenfeld reminded his audience, it remains a nontrivial one.

Dr. Rosenfeld, Chairman and Professor of Otolaryngology at SUNY Downstate Medical Center in Brooklyn, NY, and his co-presenter, Martin J. Burton, MA, DM, of the Department of Otolaryngology- Head and Neck Surgery at Oxford Radcliffe Hospitals in the UK and founding editor of the Cochrane Collaboration ENT Section, summarized the dilemmas surrounding tonsillectomy, including appropriate indications, the most effective surgical methods, perioperative management, and clinical outcomes. Both presenters used humor to good effect during their well-organized presentation designed to introduce a more rational approach to tonsillectomy.

Tonsillectomy is not as common today as it was during the mid-20th century, when 1.5 million tonsillectomies were performed each year in the United States (that number had decreased to approximately 500,000 by 2000). Despite the abundance of research studies-770 randomized controlled trials, more than 440 of which have been published since 2000-there is still uncertainty regarding many aspects of tonsillectomy, including patient selection. Otolaryngologists are familiar with the Pittsburgh criteria advanced by Paradise et al. in the mid 1980s1 (7 throat infections in the past year, 5 per year for two years, or 3 per year for three years) and many use these criteria or a more relaxed version to guide their surgical decision-making.

However, other human and psychological factors can affect surgeons’ decisions. Mr. Burton cited results from a 2000 UK survey questionnaire, in which otolaryngologic surgeons were queried about factors that most influence their decisions to perform tonsillectomy. Surprisingly frank, the respondents reported that 50% of the time, assertive parents determined their decision to opt for a tonsillectomy.

Rarely Black or White

After a brief history of the indications for tonsillectomy-an operation that has existed since ancient times-Mr. Burton offered a panoply of the review efforts designed to ferret out the most appropriate use of tonsillectomy, as well as the best surgical techniques and perioperative management strategies. The Cochrane Collaboration, initiated by Sir Iain Chalmers, conducts systematic reviews of studies to help facilitate rational health care decision making. After comprehensive searches of the medical literature on a designated topic (using databases such as The Cochrane Library, MEDLINE, and EMBASE), editors cull through groups of relevant studies and rate the level of evidence (with randomized controlled trials [RCTs] ranked as level 1 evidence). Findings from studies that meet inclusion criteria (ie, that all address the same research question) are then combined and analyzed in the aggregate in order to arrive at general conclusions about the effects of interventions.

Pages: 1 2 3 4 | Single Page

Filed Under: Laryngology, Pediatric Tagged With: AAO-HNS annual meeting, head and neck surgery, patient satisfaction, tonsillectomyIssue: December 2009

You Might Also Like:

  • Clinical Judgment: Balancing Evidence-Based Medicine and Patient Self-Determination
  • Powered Intracapsular Tonsillectomy Is a Safe Alternative to Traditional Tonsillectomy
  • Tonsillectomy Revisited: New guidelines represent a clinical shift for some otolaryngologists
  • Is Partial Tonsillectomy Equivalent to Total Tonsillectomy for Obstructive Symptoms?

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

The Triological SocietyENTtoday is a publication of The Triological Society.

Polls

Would you choose a concierge physician as your PCP?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...
  • Polls Archive

Top Articles for Residents

  • Applications Open for Resident Members of ENTtoday Edit Board
  • How To Provide Helpful Feedback To Residents
  • Call for Resident Bowl Questions
  • New Standardized Otolaryngology Curriculum Launching July 1 Should Be Valuable Resource For Physicians Around The World
  • Do Training Programs Give Otolaryngology Residents the Necessary Tools to Do Productive Research?
  • Popular this Week
  • Most Popular
  • Most Recent
    • A Journey Through Pay Inequity: A Physician’s Firsthand Account

    • The Dramatic Rise in Tongue Tie and Lip Tie Treatment

    • Otolaryngologists Are Still Debating the Effectiveness of Tongue Tie Treatment

    • Is Middle Ear Pressure Affected by Continuous Positive Airway Pressure Use?

    • Rating Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Severity: How Do Two Common Instruments Compare?

    • The Dramatic Rise in Tongue Tie and Lip Tie Treatment

    • Rating Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Severity: How Do Two Common Instruments Compare?

    • Is Middle Ear Pressure Affected by Continuous Positive Airway Pressure Use?

    • Otolaryngologists Are Still Debating the Effectiveness of Tongue Tie Treatment

    • Complications for When Physicians Change a Maiden Name

    • Excitement Around Gene Therapy for Hearing Restoration
    • “Small” Acts of Kindness
    • How To: Endoscopic Total Maxillectomy Without Facial Skin Incision
    • Science Communities Must Speak Out When Policies Threaten Health and Safety
    • Observation Most Cost-Effective in Addressing AECRS in Absence of Bacterial Infection

Follow Us

  • Contact Us
  • About Us
  • Advertise
  • The Triological Society
  • The Laryngoscope
  • Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use
  • Cookies

Wiley

Copyright © 2025 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc. All rights reserved, including rights for text and data mining and training of artificial technologies or similar technologies. ISSN 1559-4939