ENTtoday
  • Home
  • COVID-19
  • Practice Focus
    • Allergy
    • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
    • Head and Neck
    • Laryngology
    • Otology/Neurotology
    • Pediatric
    • Rhinology
    • Sleep Medicine
  • Departments
    • Issue Archive
    • TRIO Best Practices
      • Allergy
      • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
      • Head and Neck
      • Laryngology
      • Otology/Neurotology
      • Pediatric
      • Rhinology
      • Sleep Medicine
    • Career Development
    • Case of the Month
    • Everyday Ethics
    • Health Policy
    • Legal Matters
    • Letter From the Editor
    • Medical Education
    • Online Exclusives
    • Practice Management
    • Resident Focus
    • Rx: Wellness
    • Special Reports
    • Tech Talk
    • Viewpoint
    • What’s Your O.R. Playlist?
  • Literature Reviews
    • Allergy
    • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
    • Head and Neck
    • Laryngology
    • Otology/Neurotology
    • Pediatric
    • Rhinology
    • Sleep Medicine
  • Events
    • Featured Events
    • TRIO Meetings
  • Contact Us
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Triological Society
    • Advertising Staff
    • Subscribe
  • Advertise
    • Place an Ad
    • Classifieds
    • Rate Card
  • Search

Tonsillectomy Revisited: New guidelines represent a clinical shift for some otolaryngologists

by Mary Beth Nierengarten • February 7, 2011

  • Tweet
  • Email
Print-Friendly Version
A medical illustration from 1923 showing a tonsillectomy. The guillotine is in the left hand, introduced with its fenestra under the lowermost limit of the left tonsil, at the junction of the faucial with the lingual tonsil tissues.

You Might Also Like

No related posts.

Explore This Issue
February 2011
A medical illustration from 1923 showing a tonsillectomy. The guillotine is in the left hand, introduced with its fenestra under the lowermost limit of the left tonsil, at the junction of the faucial with the lingual tonsil tissues.

In its ongoing commitment to develop and practice evidence-based medicine, the American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery (AAO-HNS) recently issued a new clinical practice guideline on tonsillectomy in children.

Richard M. Rosenfeld, MD, MPH, professor and chair of otolaryngology at SUNY Downstate Medical Center in Brooklyn, N.Y. and one of the authors of the guidelines, said that they have been well received by the otolaryngology community so far. He acknowledged, however, as did several other experts interviewed for this article, that two recommendations in particular may create a stir because they support a change in clinical practice that, for some, may contradict years of clinical experience.

A multidisciplinary panel of experts researched and reviewed the literature on tonsillectomy from clinical practice guidelines published in the past 10 years, from systematic reviews published within the past 15 years, and from 705 randomized clinical trials. The panel members represented the fields of sleep medicine, advanced practice nursing, anesthesiology, infectious disease, family medicine, otolaryngology-head and neck surgery and pediatrics; it also included consumers.

As stated in the guidelines, their primary purpose is to provide evidence-based guidance on how to identify children who are the best candidates for tonsillectomy. Secondary aims include optimizing the perioperative management of children undergoing tonsillectomy, reducing inappropriate or unnecessary variations in care, and improving counseling and education of families who are considering tonsillectomy for their children.

The guidelines do not apply to partial tonsil removal techniques, such as tonsillotomy or intracapsular surgery, or to children with comorbid conditions that exclude them from most tonsillectomy research studies (e.g., children with diabetes, cardiopulmonary disease, craniofacial disorders, congenital anomalies of the head and neck region, sickle cell disease and other coagulopathies or immunodeficiency disorders).

First presented at the annual AAO-HNS meeting in Boston in September, the guidelines were published last month (Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2011;144:S1-S30) and provide 10 statements that cover indications for surgery, perioperative care and postoperative care. Each statement generates either a recommendation or a strong recommendation (with one statement seen as optional) based on the level of evidence (See Table 1, p. 5). The guidelines are not meant to supersede professional judgement but to provide guidelines for management based on available data. A “strong recommendation” means that the benefits of the approach clearly exceed the harms as substantiated by high quality studies while a “recommendation” means the benefits exceed the harms but that the supporting evidence is not as strong.

Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 | Single Page

Filed Under: Everyday Ethics, Health Policy, Laryngology, Pediatric Tagged With: guidelines, laryngology, pediatric otolaryngologyIssue: February 2011

You Might Also Like:

The Triological SocietyENTtoday is a publication of The Triological Society.

The Laryngoscope
Ensure you have all the latest research at your fingertips; Subscribe to The Laryngoscope today!

Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology
Open access journal in otolaryngology – head and neck surgery is currently accepting submissions.

Classifieds

View the classified ads »

TRIO Best Practices

View the TRIO Best Practices »

Top Articles for Residents

  • Do Training Programs Give Otolaryngology Residents the Necessary Tools to Do Productive Research?
  • Why More MDs, Medical Residents Are Choosing to Pursue Additional Academic Degrees
  • What Physicians Need to Know about Investing Before Hiring a Financial Advisor
  • Tips to Help You Regain Your Sense of Self
  • Should USMLE Step 1 Change from Numeric Score to Pass/Fail?
  • Popular this Week
  • Most Popular
  • Most Recent
    • The Dramatic Rise in Tongue Tie and Lip Tie Treatment
    • Rating Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Severity: How Do Two Common Instruments Compare?
    • Vertigo in the Elderly: What Does It Mean?
    • Complications for When Physicians Change a Maiden Name
    • Neurogenic Cough Is Often a Diagnosis of Exclusion
    • The Dramatic Rise in Tongue Tie and Lip Tie Treatment
    • Rating Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Severity: How Do Two Common Instruments Compare?
    • Vertigo in the Elderly: What Does It Mean?
    • Neurogenic Cough Is Often a Diagnosis of Exclusion
    • Complications for When Physicians Change a Maiden Name
    • Smell and Taste Disorder Differences Seen Between Long-Term COVID-19 and non-COVID-19 Patients
    • The Triological Society is Growing in Ethnic and Gender Diversity as Well as Thesis Acceptance
    • No Persistent Postoperative Swallowing Dysfunction Following Pharyngeal Surgery in Patients with Obstructive Sleep Apnea
    • Do the Principles of Adult Learning Maximize Training Efficiency and Efficacy for Pediatric Otolaryngologists?
    • Prolonged Operative Time Associated with Multiple Adverse Outcomes in Endoscopic Sinonasal Surgery

Polls

Do you think that women have made large enough strides in otolaryngology leadership and gender equity?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...
  • Polls Archive
  • Home
  • Contact Us
  • Advertise
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use
  • Cookie Preferences

Visit: The Triological Society • The Laryngoscope • Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology

Wiley
© 2023 The Triological Society. All Rights Reserved.
ISSN 1559-4939