• Home
  • Practice Focus
    • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
    • Head and Neck
    • Laryngology
    • Otology/Neurotology
    • Pediatric
    • Rhinology
    • Sleep Medicine
    • How I Do It
    • TRIO Best Practices
  • Business of Medicine
    • Health Policy
    • Legal Matters
    • Practice Management
    • Tech Talk
    • AI
  • Literature Reviews
    • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
    • Head and Neck
    • Laryngology
    • Otology/Neurotology
    • Pediatric
    • Rhinology
    • Sleep Medicine
  • Career
    • Medical Education
    • Professional Development
    • Resident Focus
  • ENT Perspectives
    • ENT Expressions
    • Everyday Ethics
    • From TRIO
    • The Great Debate
    • Letter From the Editor
    • Rx: Wellness
    • The Voice
    • Viewpoint
  • TRIO Resources
    • Triological Society
    • The Laryngoscope
    • Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology
    • TRIO Combined Sections Meetings
    • COSM
    • Related Otolaryngology Events
  • Search

CROS and Baha-Which Type of Hearing Assistance Is Better?

by Heather Lindsey • January 1, 2009

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
Print-Friendly Version

The system confers sensitive hearing afforded by an efficient connection to the temporal bone, said Dr. Niparko. Because the cochlea is rigidly ensconced in the temporal bone, vibrations are faithfully conveyed to it, he explained.

You Might Also Like

  • Bone-Anchored Hearing Aids Offer Viable Alternative to Standard Devices
  • New Cochlear Implant Improves Hearing in Subset of Patients
  • Atresiaplasty versus Bone-Anchored Hearing Aid for Congenital Aural Atresia
  • SM14: Treatment for Thyroid Tumors and Benefits of Hearing Devices Spark Debate Among Otolaryngologists
Explore This Issue
January 2009

Baha was originally indicated for hearing losses not amenable to conventional amplification, including mixed losses due to chronic infection, inoperable otosclerosis, and atresia of the ear canal or middle ear mechanism, said Dr. Niparko.

In these cases, the ear that has the hearing loss receives the Baha, explained Gail Murray, PhD, Director of Audiology Services and Clinical Director of the Cochlear Implant Program at the University Hospitals Case Medical Center in Cleveland, Ohio.

In 2002, the FDA approved Baha for use in patients with unilateral sensorineural hearing loss. Currently, the most common Baha indication is for patients with single-sided deafness who don’t benefit from a hearing aid on the side of impairment, noted Dr. Murray.

If, for example, a patient loses hearing in the left ear due to a brain tumor being removed or an infection, Baha can be implanted near the left ear and carry sound vibrations through the skull directly to the right ear’s cochlear nerve, explained Dr. Kohan. There’s no loss of energy of vibrations, he said. It’s an efficient way to transmit sound to the cochlea.

CROS Advantages

The advantage of traditional and transcranial CROS is that they both transmit sound from the bad ear to the good ear without requiring surgery, noted Dr. Kohan, adding that traditional CROS has been the workhorse of hearing aids for decades.

People who have contraindications for surgery might benefit from a CROS system, said Dr. Wazen. Although surgery for Baha is minimal, some patients prefer nonsurgical options, he said.

Another advantage of both traditional and transcranial CROS is that patients can remove these devices and use them when they want, said Dr. Kohan.

Figure. What's that you say? Both Baha and CROS have advantages and disadvantages, but Baha seems to have an edge due to better hearing quality and patient comfort.

click for large version
Figure. What’s that you say? Both Baha and CROS have advantages and disadvantages, but Baha seems to have an edge due to better hearing quality and patient comfort.

Baha Advantages

Although CROS doesn’t require surgery, Baha tends to have a high level of user satisfaction, said Dr. Niparko. Bone-conducted hearing seems to transfer sound across the skull in a narrow but useful band within the sound frequencies occupied by many consonants, he said. This creates a useful filter that appears to allow for access to speech sounds from the hearing-impaired side but limits noise inputs from that side, he explained.

Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 | Single Page

Filed Under: Everyday Ethics, Otology/Neurotology, Tech Talk Issue: January 2009

You Might Also Like:

  • Bone-Anchored Hearing Aids Offer Viable Alternative to Standard Devices
  • New Cochlear Implant Improves Hearing in Subset of Patients
  • Atresiaplasty versus Bone-Anchored Hearing Aid for Congenital Aural Atresia
  • SM14: Treatment for Thyroid Tumors and Benefits of Hearing Devices Spark Debate Among Otolaryngologists

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

The Triological SocietyENTtoday is a publication of The Triological Society.

Polls

Would you choose a concierge physician as your PCP?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...
  • Polls Archive

Top Articles for Residents

  • Applications Open for Resident Members of ENTtoday Edit Board
  • How To Provide Helpful Feedback To Residents
  • Call for Resident Bowl Questions
  • New Standardized Otolaryngology Curriculum Launching July 1 Should Be Valuable Resource For Physicians Around The World
  • Do Training Programs Give Otolaryngology Residents the Necessary Tools to Do Productive Research?
  • Popular this Week
  • Most Popular
  • Most Recent
    • A Journey Through Pay Inequity: A Physician’s Firsthand Account

    • The Dramatic Rise in Tongue Tie and Lip Tie Treatment

    • Otolaryngologists Are Still Debating the Effectiveness of Tongue Tie Treatment

    • Is Middle Ear Pressure Affected by Continuous Positive Airway Pressure Use?

    • Rating Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Severity: How Do Two Common Instruments Compare?

    • The Dramatic Rise in Tongue Tie and Lip Tie Treatment

    • Rating Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Severity: How Do Two Common Instruments Compare?

    • Is Middle Ear Pressure Affected by Continuous Positive Airway Pressure Use?

    • Otolaryngologists Are Still Debating the Effectiveness of Tongue Tie Treatment

    • Complications for When Physicians Change a Maiden Name

    • Excitement Around Gene Therapy for Hearing Restoration
    • “Small” Acts of Kindness
    • How To: Endoscopic Total Maxillectomy Without Facial Skin Incision
    • Science Communities Must Speak Out When Policies Threaten Health and Safety
    • Observation Most Cost-Effective in Addressing AECRS in Absence of Bacterial Infection

Follow Us

  • Contact Us
  • About Us
  • Advertise
  • The Triological Society
  • The Laryngoscope
  • Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use
  • Cookies

Wiley

Copyright © 2025 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc. All rights reserved, including rights for text and data mining and training of artificial technologies or similar technologies. ISSN 1559-4939