• Home
  • Practice Focus
    • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
    • Head and Neck
    • Laryngology
    • Otology/Neurotology
    • Pediatric
    • Rhinology
    • Sleep Medicine
    • How I Do It
    • TRIO Best Practices
  • Business of Medicine
    • Health Policy
    • Legal Matters
    • Practice Management
    • Tech Talk
    • AI
  • Literature Reviews
    • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
    • Head and Neck
    • Laryngology
    • Otology/Neurotology
    • Pediatric
    • Rhinology
    • Sleep Medicine
  • Career
    • Medical Education
    • Professional Development
    • Resident Focus
  • ENT Perspectives
    • ENT Expressions
    • Everyday Ethics
    • From TRIO
    • The Great Debate
    • Letter From the Editor
    • Rx: Wellness
    • The Voice
    • Viewpoint
  • TRIO Resources
    • Triological Society
    • The Laryngoscope
    • Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology
    • TRIO Combined Sections Meetings
    • COSM
    • Related Otolaryngology Events
  • Search

CROS and Baha-Which Type of Hearing Assistance Is Better?

by Heather Lindsey • January 1, 2009

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
Print-Friendly Version

However, coverage for children is not available until they are five years of age, because their skulls are usually too thin for a surgically implanted system prior to that time. Until then, they may use a soft headband to hold the Baha in place.

You Might Also Like

  • Bone-Anchored Hearing Aids Offer Viable Alternative to Standard Devices
  • New Cochlear Implant Improves Hearing in Subset of Patients
  • Atresiaplasty versus Bone-Anchored Hearing Aid for Congenital Aural Atresia
  • SM14: Treatment for Thyroid Tumors and Benefits of Hearing Devices Spark Debate Among Otolaryngologists
Explore This Issue
January 2009

Overall, the Baha system is one of the fastest growing technologies in otolaryngology, noted Dr. Niparko. One of the things that I find astounding is that close to 50,000 Bahas are in use worldwide, and just three years ago the number was under 10,000, he said.

CROS Disadvantages

For both traditional and transcranial CROS, you don’t find much user satisfaction, said Dr. Niparko.

Both systems require that a device be placed in the ear canal of the better-hearing ear, which the vast majority of users find to be a drawback, he said. As this better ear is the lifeline to the world of sound for the monaural patient, any type of impediment to hearing on that side is noticeable and often distressing, explained Dr. Niparko.

Patients can experience a blocking sensation with sound because of having to wear a device in their good ear, agreed Sam J. Marzo, MD, Associate Professor in the Department of Otolaryngology at Loyola University Health System in Maywood, IL, and a consultant for Cochlear Corporation. Dr. Marzo often sees patients who have tried CROS hearing aids but who are unhappy with the technology for this reason.

Moreover, because transcranial CROS must fit deeply and tightly within the ear canal, patients may experience discomfort, pain, and problems with cerumen buildup or infection, said Dr. Wazen.

Dr. Murray and her colleagues generally don’t use transcranial CROS for this reason. It’s also twice as expensive as a traditional CROS device, and neither the traditional or transcranial CROS is covered by most insurance companies, she said. Prices vary greatly from center to center. We charge $3500 for a CROS system and $4700 for a transcranial CROS, she said.

Baha Disadvantages

Although CROS may be uncomfortable, having to undergo surgery is the main drawback of Baha. The chief concern with the bone-anchored system is the need for a bony implant that connects to the processor through the skin, said Dr. Niparko. However, with careful surgical planning, the implant can be placed in a manner that makes it unobtrusive and a useful conduit of sound, he added.

Additionally, patients may experience infection around the external abutment. I tell patients they have to take care of the post like they take care of their teeth, said Dr. Wazen. They need to clean and brush it and remove any crusting that occurs so it will last a lifetime without major problems, he explained. If patients are not careful, the surrounding skin can become inflamed and infected. Most of these problems can be treated by a topical antibiotic or, in some cases, an oral antibiotic, he said.

Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 | Single Page

Filed Under: Everyday Ethics, Otology/Neurotology, Tech Talk Issue: January 2009

You Might Also Like:

  • Bone-Anchored Hearing Aids Offer Viable Alternative to Standard Devices
  • New Cochlear Implant Improves Hearing in Subset of Patients
  • Atresiaplasty versus Bone-Anchored Hearing Aid for Congenital Aural Atresia
  • SM14: Treatment for Thyroid Tumors and Benefits of Hearing Devices Spark Debate Among Otolaryngologists

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

The Triological SocietyENTtoday is a publication of The Triological Society.

Polls

Would you choose a concierge physician as your PCP?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...
  • Polls Archive

Top Articles for Residents

  • Applications Open for Resident Members of ENTtoday Edit Board
  • How To Provide Helpful Feedback To Residents
  • Call for Resident Bowl Questions
  • New Standardized Otolaryngology Curriculum Launching July 1 Should Be Valuable Resource For Physicians Around The World
  • Do Training Programs Give Otolaryngology Residents the Necessary Tools to Do Productive Research?
  • Popular this Week
  • Most Popular
  • Most Recent
    • A Journey Through Pay Inequity: A Physician’s Firsthand Account

    • The Dramatic Rise in Tongue Tie and Lip Tie Treatment

    • Otolaryngologists Are Still Debating the Effectiveness of Tongue Tie Treatment

    • Is Middle Ear Pressure Affected by Continuous Positive Airway Pressure Use?

    • Rating Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Severity: How Do Two Common Instruments Compare?

    • The Dramatic Rise in Tongue Tie and Lip Tie Treatment

    • Rating Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Severity: How Do Two Common Instruments Compare?

    • Is Middle Ear Pressure Affected by Continuous Positive Airway Pressure Use?

    • Otolaryngologists Are Still Debating the Effectiveness of Tongue Tie Treatment

    • Complications for When Physicians Change a Maiden Name

    • Excitement Around Gene Therapy for Hearing Restoration
    • “Small” Acts of Kindness
    • How To: Endoscopic Total Maxillectomy Without Facial Skin Incision
    • Science Communities Must Speak Out When Policies Threaten Health and Safety
    • Observation Most Cost-Effective in Addressing AECRS in Absence of Bacterial Infection

Follow Us

  • Contact Us
  • About Us
  • Advertise
  • The Triological Society
  • The Laryngoscope
  • Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use
  • Cookies

Wiley

Copyright © 2025 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc. All rights reserved, including rights for text and data mining and training of artificial technologies or similar technologies. ISSN 1559-4939