• Home
  • Practice Focus
    • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
    • Head and Neck
    • Laryngology
    • Otology/Neurotology
    • Pediatric
    • Rhinology
    • Sleep Medicine
    • How I Do It
    • TRIO Best Practices
  • Business of Medicine
    • Health Policy
    • Legal Matters
    • Practice Management
    • Tech Talk
    • AI
  • Literature Reviews
    • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
    • Head and Neck
    • Laryngology
    • Otology/Neurotology
    • Pediatric
    • Rhinology
    • Sleep Medicine
  • Career
    • Medical Education
    • Professional Development
    • Resident Focus
  • ENT Perspectives
    • ENT Expressions
    • Everyday Ethics
    • From TRIO
    • The Great Debate
    • Letter From the Editor
    • Rx: Wellness
    • The Voice
    • Viewpoint
  • TRIO Resources
    • Triological Society
    • The Laryngoscope
    • Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology
    • TRIO Combined Sections Meetings
    • COSM
    • Related Otolaryngology Events
  • Search

CT Scanning of the Paranasal Sinuses: Indications, Utilization, and Radiation Risks

by Sue Pondrom • August 1, 2007

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
Print-Friendly Version

Another factor to consider in radiation dosage is the type of CT scanner used. The most common today is the axial CT scanner, which is an older, single-slice design that still provides perfectly usable images.

You Might Also Like

  • ARS Spread to Paranasal Sinuses, OMC Obstruction May Not Be Etiological Factors in Bacterial ARS Development
  • Fanconi Anemia Patients with HNSCC Tolerate Surgery Better than Radiation, Chemotherapy
  • Radiation Exposure Alters Airway Deformability during Laryngoscopy
  • Indications for Surgical Intervention
Explore This Issue
August 2007

A newer CT scanner is the multidetector CT (MDCT), which increases the efficiency of radiation amount and maximizes the information acquired. And, what Dr. Figueroa called the future in CTs is the flat panel CT, a small unit with very rapid images at very low radiation, but with limited applications.

Depending on the technology we’re using, we’re going to have different values of CT exposure, he said. Right now, the best way to scan patients for a comprehensive examination and low radiation is use of the MDCT. The limitation of the flat panel CT is that soft tissue discrimination is much lower than on the MDCT.

For physicians to become judicious users of technology, Dr. Figueroa said that it is imperative to establish guidelines for appropriate and acceptable CT examinations. In addition, requests for CT scanning must be generated only by qualified medical practitioners. CT examinations should not be repeated without substantial clinical justification. And we have many tools we could use. We need to be good users of those and be able to triage patients toward the correct imaging test, and, if necessary, eliminate inappropriate CT referrals.

©2007 The Triological Society

Pages: 1 2 3 4 | Single Page

Filed Under: Everyday Ethics, Features, Head and Neck, Practice Focus, Rhinology, Tech Talk Issue: August 2007

You Might Also Like:

  • ARS Spread to Paranasal Sinuses, OMC Obstruction May Not Be Etiological Factors in Bacterial ARS Development
  • Fanconi Anemia Patients with HNSCC Tolerate Surgery Better than Radiation, Chemotherapy
  • Radiation Exposure Alters Airway Deformability during Laryngoscopy
  • Indications for Surgical Intervention

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

The Triological SocietyENTtoday is a publication of The Triological Society.

Polls

Would you choose a concierge physician as your PCP?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...
  • Polls Archive

Top Articles for Residents

  • Applications Open for Resident Members of ENTtoday Edit Board
  • How To Provide Helpful Feedback To Residents
  • Call for Resident Bowl Questions
  • New Standardized Otolaryngology Curriculum Launching July 1 Should Be Valuable Resource For Physicians Around The World
  • Do Training Programs Give Otolaryngology Residents the Necessary Tools to Do Productive Research?
  • Popular this Week
  • Most Popular
  • Most Recent
    • A Journey Through Pay Inequity: A Physician’s Firsthand Account

    • The Dramatic Rise in Tongue Tie and Lip Tie Treatment

    • Otolaryngologists Are Still Debating the Effectiveness of Tongue Tie Treatment

    • Is Middle Ear Pressure Affected by Continuous Positive Airway Pressure Use?

    • Rating Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Severity: How Do Two Common Instruments Compare?

    • The Dramatic Rise in Tongue Tie and Lip Tie Treatment

    • Rating Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Severity: How Do Two Common Instruments Compare?

    • Is Middle Ear Pressure Affected by Continuous Positive Airway Pressure Use?

    • Otolaryngologists Are Still Debating the Effectiveness of Tongue Tie Treatment

    • Complications for When Physicians Change a Maiden Name

    • Excitement Around Gene Therapy for Hearing Restoration
    • “Small” Acts of Kindness
    • How To: Endoscopic Total Maxillectomy Without Facial Skin Incision
    • Science Communities Must Speak Out When Policies Threaten Health and Safety
    • Observation Most Cost-Effective in Addressing AECRS in Absence of Bacterial Infection

Follow Us

  • Contact Us
  • About Us
  • Advertise
  • The Triological Society
  • The Laryngoscope
  • Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use
  • Cookies

Wiley

Copyright © 2025 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc. All rights reserved, including rights for text and data mining and training of artificial technologies or similar technologies. ISSN 1559-4939