• Home
  • Practice Focus
    • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
    • Head and Neck
    • Laryngology
    • Otology/Neurotology
    • Pediatric
    • Rhinology
    • Sleep Medicine
    • How I Do It
    • TRIO Best Practices
  • Business of Medicine
    • Health Policy
    • Legal Matters
    • Practice Management
    • Tech Talk
    • AI
  • Literature Reviews
    • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
    • Head and Neck
    • Laryngology
    • Otology/Neurotology
    • Pediatric
    • Rhinology
    • Sleep Medicine
  • Career
    • Medical Education
    • Professional Development
    • Resident Focus
  • ENT Perspectives
    • ENT Expressions
    • Everyday Ethics
    • From TRIO
    • The Great Debate
    • Letter From the Editor
    • Rx: Wellness
    • The Voice
    • Viewpoint
  • TRIO Resources
    • Triological Society
    • The Laryngoscope
    • Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology
    • TRIO Combined Sections Meetings
    • COSM
    • Related Otolaryngology Events
  • Search

Diagnostic Tests Have Limited Value in Diagnosing ARS

by Mary Beth Nierengarten • March 6, 2017

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
Print-Friendly Version

Laboratory and imaging studies have limited value for the diagnosis of acute rhinosinusitis (ARS), and routine use of individual tests cannot be recommended, according to the results of a comprehensive, systematic review of the literature undertaken to determine the accuracy of laboratory and imaging studies for ARS (Br J Gen Pract. 2016;66:e612–e632).

You Might Also Like

  • ARS Spread to Paranasal Sinuses, OMC Obstruction May Not Be Etiological Factors in Bacterial ARS Development
  • Are Diagnostic Tests Useful for Nasal Valve Compromise?
  • Tests Emerging as Standards for Diagnosing HPV-Positive Oropharyngeal Cancer
  • New Guideline on Diagnosing, Treating Allergic Rhinitis

Researchers found that radiography (LR+ 2.0, LR- 0.3) and ultrasound (LR+ 1.7, LR- 0.4) had only modest accuracy for the diagnosis of acute bacterial rhinosinusitis (ABRS), said Mark H. Ebell, MD, professor of epidemiology at the University of Georgia Health Sciences Campus in Athens, and lead author of the study,

The review included studies of patients who presented with or who were referred for suspected ARS. Using antral puncture as the reference standard, the investigators assessed the accuracy of the diagnostic tools used in each of these studies.

Dr. Ebell did say that their evidence showed that testing for C-reactive protein (CRP) and erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) both had modest overall accuracy: investigators found that a CRP of >20 mg/L (LR + 2.9) and an ESR of >30 (LR+ 4.1) significantly increased the likelihood of ABRS.

The study also showed that “evaluating nasal secretions for evidence of leukocyte esterase or nitrates is promising,” said Dr. Ebell. A dipstick of nasal secretions for leucocyte esterase was highly accurate (LR+18.4, LR-0.17), but further study needs to be done to validate the finding.

Given the current evidence, Dr. Ebell said that point-of-care CRP testing, which is widely used in Europe, should help clinicians identify patients more likely to have ABRS.

Filed Under: Allergy, Online Exclusives, Practice Focus, Rhinology Tagged With: acute rhinosinusitis, allergy, diagnosis

You Might Also Like:

  • ARS Spread to Paranasal Sinuses, OMC Obstruction May Not Be Etiological Factors in Bacterial ARS Development
  • Are Diagnostic Tests Useful for Nasal Valve Compromise?
  • Tests Emerging as Standards for Diagnosing HPV-Positive Oropharyngeal Cancer
  • New Guideline on Diagnosing, Treating Allergic Rhinitis

The Triological SocietyENTtoday is a publication of The Triological Society.

Polls

Would you choose a concierge physician as your PCP?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...
  • Polls Archive

Top Articles for Residents

  • Applications Open for Resident Members of ENTtoday Edit Board
  • How To Provide Helpful Feedback To Residents
  • Call for Resident Bowl Questions
  • New Standardized Otolaryngology Curriculum Launching July 1 Should Be Valuable Resource For Physicians Around The World
  • Do Training Programs Give Otolaryngology Residents the Necessary Tools to Do Productive Research?
  • Popular this Week
  • Most Popular
  • Most Recent
    • The Dramatic Rise in Tongue Tie and Lip Tie Treatment

    • Otolaryngologists Are Still Debating the Effectiveness of Tongue Tie Treatment

    • Is Middle Ear Pressure Affected by Continuous Positive Airway Pressure Use?

    • Rating Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Severity: How Do Two Common Instruments Compare?

    • 22 Symptoms Common to Patients with Superior Canal Dehiscence Syndrome

    • The Dramatic Rise in Tongue Tie and Lip Tie Treatment

    • Rating Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Severity: How Do Two Common Instruments Compare?

    • Is Middle Ear Pressure Affected by Continuous Positive Airway Pressure Use?

    • Otolaryngologists Are Still Debating the Effectiveness of Tongue Tie Treatment

    • Complications for When Physicians Change a Maiden Name

    • Excitement Around Gene Therapy for Hearing Restoration
    • “Small” Acts of Kindness
    • How To: Endoscopic Total Maxillectomy Without Facial Skin Incision
    • Science Communities Must Speak Out When Policies Threaten Health and Safety
    • Observation Most Cost-Effective in Addressing AECRS in Absence of Bacterial Infection

Follow Us

  • Contact Us
  • About Us
  • Advertise
  • The Triological Society
  • The Laryngoscope
  • Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use
  • Cookies

Wiley

Copyright © 2025 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc. All rights reserved, including rights for text and data mining and training of artificial technologies or similar technologies. ISSN 1559-4939