• Home
  • Practice Focus
    • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
    • Head and Neck
    • Laryngology
    • Otology/Neurotology
    • Pediatric
    • Rhinology
    • Sleep Medicine
    • How I Do It
    • TRIO Best Practices
  • Business of Medicine
    • Health Policy
    • Legal Matters
    • Practice Management
    • Tech Talk
    • AI
  • Literature Reviews
    • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
    • Head and Neck
    • Laryngology
    • Otology/Neurotology
    • Pediatric
    • Rhinology
    • Sleep Medicine
  • Career
    • Medical Education
    • Professional Development
    • Resident Focus
  • ENT Perspectives
    • ENT Expressions
    • Everyday Ethics
    • From TRIO
    • The Great Debate
    • Letter From the Editor
    • Rx: Wellness
    • The Voice
    • Viewpoint
  • TRIO Resources
    • Triological Society
    • The Laryngoscope
    • Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology
    • TRIO Combined Sections Meetings
    • COSM
    • Related Otolaryngology Events
  • Search

Endoscopic Approach Reduces the Need for ‘Second-Look’ Mastoid Surgery

by Paula Moyer • May 1, 2007

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
Print-Friendly Version

The impact of the endoscope has been one of evolution, not revolution, according to Dr. Haberkamp. So far, the endoscope has not changed mastoid surgery the way it has changed sinus surgery, he said.

You Might Also Like

  • Intraoperative Endoscope Use Reduces Cholesteatoma Recurrence, Cost
  • Mastoid Obliteration Could Be Effective in Cholesteatoma Surgery, but More Data Are Needed
  • Reboot Approach Significantly Reduces Post-Op Nasal Polyp Recurrence
  • How To: Transcanal Endoscopic Ear Surgery for Epitympanic Cholesteatoma with Obliteration Using Bioglass
Explore This Issue
May 2007

He agreed with Dr. Sajjadi, though, that the endoscopic approach’s key advantages are greater visualization and the reduced need for more invasive repeat surgeries. It allows us to peer around the corner and see areas we couldn’t before and remove disease, he said. We’re able to avoid more radical surgeries in some cases.

Tight Space, Less Three-Dimensional Visualization

A key disadvantage that differentiates endoscopic mastoid surgery from endoscopic sinus surgery is the small size of the middle ear in relation to that of a sinus cavity. When you’re trying to work in the middle ear, it’s difficult to work with the endoscope and the instrument scooping out disease, Dr. Haberkamp said. The instrument and endoscope take up 25 percent to 30 percent of the space. Also, when you’re looking at the space with the endoscope, you lose the three-dimensional depth of field you have with the microscope, so you can’t always tell the difference between deep and shallow areas of the sinus tympani.

Surgeons should therefore be particularly cautious, he said, noting that he had observed fractures of the ossicles and stapes in training labs, even though he could not recall seeing such fractures in actual surgeries. It takes practice, he stressed. Even though fractures are rare, we should remember the potential for their occurrence and use caution.

He again agreed with Dr. Sajjadi that surgeons should be prepared to invest additional operating time during the learning phase. It takes an extra 20 minutes initially to add the endoscope to traditional techniques, he noted. It is still cost-effective, because you get better visualization and remove more disease.

Unlike repeat mastoid surgeries, endoscopic second-look procedures can be done in the office with a local anesthetic in selected patients, he added.

Dr. Haberkamp noted that the endoscopes used in mastoid procedures are much smaller than conventional sinuscopes: they come in sizes of 1.7 mm, 2.7 mm, and 3.5 mm in diameter. One limitation, though, is that the endoscopes at 70° do not come in the smaller size.

No Separate ICD-9 Code

Both experts pointed out that there is no separate International Classification of Disease-9 (ICD-9) code for endoscopic mastoid surgery. Therefore, the accounting department will need to use the same code as when billing for a standard mastoid procedure. If you bill additionally for the endoscopic, insurance companies vary in how easy it is to get paid, Dr. Haberkamp said.

Pages: 1 2 3 4 | Single Page

Filed Under: Articles, Clinical, Features Issue: May 2007

You Might Also Like:

  • Intraoperative Endoscope Use Reduces Cholesteatoma Recurrence, Cost
  • Mastoid Obliteration Could Be Effective in Cholesteatoma Surgery, but More Data Are Needed
  • Reboot Approach Significantly Reduces Post-Op Nasal Polyp Recurrence
  • How To: Transcanal Endoscopic Ear Surgery for Epitympanic Cholesteatoma with Obliteration Using Bioglass

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

The Triological SocietyENTtoday is a publication of The Triological Society.

Polls

Do you use AI-powered scribes for documentation?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...
  • Polls Archive

Top Articles for Residents

  • Applications Open for Resident Members of ENTtoday Edit Board
  • How To Provide Helpful Feedback To Residents
  • Call for Resident Bowl Questions
  • New Standardized Otolaryngology Curriculum Launching July 1 Should Be Valuable Resource For Physicians Around The World
  • Do Training Programs Give Otolaryngology Residents the Necessary Tools to Do Productive Research?
  • Popular this Week
  • Most Popular
  • Most Recent
    • How to: Positioning for Middle Cranial Fossa Repair of Superior Semicircular Canal Dehiscence

    • The Dramatic Rise in Tongue Tie and Lip Tie Treatment

    • Rating Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Severity: How Do Two Common Instruments Compare?

    • Otolaryngologists Are Still Debating the Effectiveness of Tongue Tie Treatment

    • Endoscopic Ear Surgery: Advancements and Adoption Challenges 

    • The Dramatic Rise in Tongue Tie and Lip Tie Treatment

    • Rating Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Severity: How Do Two Common Instruments Compare?

    • Is Middle Ear Pressure Affected by Continuous Positive Airway Pressure Use?

    • Otolaryngologists Are Still Debating the Effectiveness of Tongue Tie Treatment

    • Complications for When Physicians Change a Maiden Name

    • The Importance of Time Away
    • Endoscopic Ear Surgery: Advancements and Adoption Challenges 
    • Reflections from a Past President of the Triological Society
    • ENT Surgeons Explore the Benefits and Challenges of AI-Powered Scribes: Revolutionizing Documentation in Healthcare
    • How To: Open Expansion Laryngoplasty for Combined Glottic and Subglottic Stenosis

Follow Us

  • Contact Us
  • About Us
  • Advertise
  • The Triological Society
  • The Laryngoscope
  • Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use
  • Cookies

Wiley

Copyright © 2025 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc. All rights reserved, including rights for text and data mining and training of artificial technologies or similar technologies. ISSN 1559-4939