• Home
  • Practice Focus
    • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
    • Head and Neck
    • Laryngology
    • Otology/Neurotology
    • Pediatric
    • Rhinology
    • Sleep Medicine
    • How I Do It
    • TRIO Best Practices
  • Business of Medicine
    • Health Policy
    • Legal Matters
    • Practice Management
    • Technology
    • AI
    • History of Otolaryngology
  • Literature Reviews
    • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
    • Head and Neck
    • Laryngology
    • Otology/Neurotology
    • Pediatric
    • Rhinology
    • Sleep Medicine
  • Career
    • Medical Education
    • Professional Development
    • Resident Focus
  • ENT Perspectives
    • ENT Expressions
    • Everyday Ethics
    • From TRIO
    • The Great Debate
    • Letter From the Editor
    • Rx: Wellness
    • The Voice
    • Viewpoint
    • SUO Corner
  • TRIO Resources
    • Triological Society
    • The Laryngoscope
    • Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology
    • TRIO Combined Sections Meetings
    • COSM
    • Related Otolaryngology Events
  • Search

Evaluating Abnormal MRI in Asymmetric Sensorineural Hearing Loss

by Larry Lundy, MD • October 14, 2016

  • Tweet
  • Email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
Print-Friendly Version

Are there specific audiometric and clinical factors that can predict a positive MRI in the evaluation of asymmetric sensorineural hearing loss?

Bottom Line
Patients with an unexplained, asymmetric sensorineural hearing loss that includes a 15 dB or greater difference at 3 kHz, unilateral tinnitus, or dizziness/vertigo are significantly more likely to have an abnormal MRI scan than patients who do not meet these criteria.

You Might Also Like

  • Abnormal MRI in Asymmetric Sensorineural Hearing Loss
  • MRI, CT Imaging Beneficial for Pediatric Sensorineural Hearing Loss
  • MRI, CT Beneficial for Pediatric Sensorineural Hearing Loss
  • What Defines Asymmetric Sensorineural Hearing Loss?
Explore This Issue
October 2016

Background: Asymmetric sensorineural hearing loss occurs in about 35% to 50% of the population, depending on how strictly “asymmetric” is defined. Prior studies indicate only 2% to 8% of patients with an asymmetric sensorineural hearing loss have a vestibular schwannoma.

Study design: Retrospective chart review of 451 patients with asymmetric sensorineural hearing loss who had an MRI scan over a seven-year period.

Setting: Tertiary referral center.

Synopsis: In this study, 89.4% of all patients with an asymmetric sensorineural hearing loss had normal or unrelated MRI scans. Overall, 21 (4.7%) had a vestibular schwannoma, and 27 (6%) had other pathology that could account for their asymmetric sensorineural hearing loss, including labyrinthitis, infarct, and vascular abnormality. A multivariate analysis of audiometric criteria revealed only the 15 dB difference at 3 kHz to be significant. Patients with any asymmetric sensorineural hearing loss and unilateral tinnitus or dizziness/vertigo are significantly more likely to have an abnormal MRI finding.

Reference: Ahsan SF, Standring R, Osborn DA, Peterson E, Seidman M, Jain R. Clinical predictors of abnormal magnetic resonance imaging findings in patients with asymmetric sensorineural hearing loss. JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2016;141:451–456.

Filed Under: Uncategorized Tagged With: abnormal MRI, asymmetric sensorineural hearing loss, diagnosis, hearing loss, MRI, positive MRIIssue: October 2016

You Might Also Like:

  • Abnormal MRI in Asymmetric Sensorineural Hearing Loss
  • MRI, CT Imaging Beneficial for Pediatric Sensorineural Hearing Loss
  • MRI, CT Beneficial for Pediatric Sensorineural Hearing Loss
  • What Defines Asymmetric Sensorineural Hearing Loss?

The Triological SocietyENTtoday is a publication of The Triological Society.

Polls

Have you participated in any leadership training to further your career?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...
  • Polls Archive

Top Articles for Residents

  • Is the SLOR in Otolaryngology Residency Applications Contributing to Rural Disparities?
  • Applications Open for Resident Members of the ENTtoday Editorial Board: Deadline Extended
  • A Resident’s View of AI in Otolaryngology
  • Call for Resident Bowl Questions
  • Resident Pearls: Pediatric Otolaryngologists Share Tips for Safer, Smarter Tonsillectomies
  • Popular this Week
  • Most Popular
  • Most Recent
    • History of the Cochlear Implant
    • The Dramatic Rise in Tongue Tie and Lip Tie Treatment
    • Signaling in Otolaryngology Resident Matching
    • Otolaryngology Hospitalists: A Relatively New Role
    • A Resident’s View of AI in Otolaryngology
    • The Dramatic Rise in Tongue Tie and Lip Tie Treatment
    • Rating Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Severity: How Do Two Common Instruments Compare?
    • Is Middle Ear Pressure Affected by Continuous Positive Airway Pressure Use?
    • Otolaryngologists Are Still Debating the Effectiveness of Tongue Tie Treatment
    • Complications for When Physicians Change a Maiden Name
    • Otolaryngology Hospitalists: A Relatively New Role
    • Feeling the Squeeze
    • Patient and Procedural Predictors of Early Recovery Quality after Endoscopic Endonasal Surgery
    • What’s New Versus Tried and True in Pulsatile Tinnitus
    • The Impact of Chronic Particulate Matter Exposure on Quality-of-Life Outcomes after ESS

Follow Us

  • Contact Us
  • About Us
  • Advertise
  • The Triological Society
  • The Laryngoscope
  • Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use
  • Cookies

Wiley

Copyright © 2026 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc. All rights reserved, including rights for text and data mining and training of artificial technologies or similar technologies. ISSN 1559-4939