• Home
  • Practice Focus
    • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
    • Head and Neck
    • Laryngology
    • Otology/Neurotology
    • Pediatric
    • Rhinology
    • Sleep Medicine
    • How I Do It
    • TRIO Best Practices
  • Business of Medicine
    • Health Policy
    • Legal Matters
    • Practice Management
    • Tech Talk
    • AI
  • Literature Reviews
    • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
    • Head and Neck
    • Laryngology
    • Otology/Neurotology
    • Pediatric
    • Rhinology
    • Sleep Medicine
  • Career
    • Medical Education
    • Professional Development
    • Resident Focus
  • ENT Perspectives
    • ENT Expressions
    • Everyday Ethics
    • From TRIO
    • The Great Debate
    • Letter From the Editor
    • Rx: Wellness
    • The Voice
    • Viewpoint
  • TRIO Resources
    • Triological Society
    • The Laryngoscope
    • Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology
    • TRIO Combined Sections Meetings
    • COSM
    • Related Otolaryngology Events
  • Search

Experts Debate Surgical Approaches To Sinus Disease

by Thomas R. Collins • August 1, 2009

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
Print-Friendly Version

FESS results showed improvements over the years, Dr. Marple said. A 1990 study of 165 patients showed that patients reported subjective improvement after 10 months, but that endoscopic disease continued. In 1992, 97% of 120 patients reported subjective improvement in a symptom-based questionnaire, but, again, the disease persisted. In 1998, at a follow-up of eight years, 98% of 120 patients showed overall improvement, but revision surgery was needed in 18% of the patients.

You Might Also Like

  • Surgical Approaches to Sinus Disease: The Debate Continues
  • Does Balloon Catheter Sinuplasty Have a Role in the Surgical Management of Pediatric Sinus Disease?
  • Frontal Sinus Drillout Viable for Frontal Sinus Disease
  • Dupilumab, Functional Endoscopic Sinus Surgery Equally Effective in Reducing Chronic Rhinosinusitis with Nasal Polyps Symptoms
Explore This Issue
August 2009
Figure. When medical management of chronic rhinosinusitis has failed, surgery may be a viable option for patients to obtain relief.

click for large version
Figure. When medical management of chronic rhinosinusitis has failed, surgery may be a viable option for patients to obtain relief.

A 2004 randomized controlled trial-the only such study on the topic, Dr. Marple noted-measured success rates of endoscopic sinus surgery compared to continued medical treatment in 90 patients who failed initial treatment of chronic rhinosinusitis. The results were roughly equivalent for the two groups.

The outcome was a little bit numbing when you look at it from the standpoint of a surgeon, Dr. Marple said. When you look at the outcome at six months and you look at outcome at 12 months, there’s really no statistically significant difference.

One major advantage of FESS is that it can be tailored to the individual, Dr. Marple noted. But there is evidence that FESS can fail at holding down inflammation in CRS.

In chronic rhinosinusitis, the overwhelming data suggest that patients feel better after sinus surgery, Dr. Marple said. Persistence of some inflammation is present-and that raises the question: Are we really accomplishing what we set out to accomplish at the very beginning by simply opening and ventilating sinuses?

In a retrospective review of 188 patients, with follow-up at 12 to 168 months, recurrence occurred in 60% of the patients and revision surgery was required in 27% of the patients.

Studies have also found that ESS can provide beneficial systemic changes in patients with more severe disease, such as CRS with polyps, with studies showing beneficial effects on asthma and that surgery can limit cytokine expression.

Another Surgical Option: Sphenoidectomy

Jean Michel Klossek, MD, PhD, of the University Hospital Poitiers in France, said that a sphenoidectomy involving a total removal of the ethmoidal mucosa is a viable option for patients with chronic rhinosinusitis with polyps. He said that his center has performed the procedure on 35 to 50 such patients each year since 1985.

It’s only for chronic rhinosinusitis with polyps, which is very important, Dr. Klossek said. It’s not for chronic rhinonsinusitis without polyps.

Pages: 1 2 3 | Single Page

Filed Under: Everyday Ethics, Head and Neck, Rhinology Tagged With: head and neck surgery, rhinology, sinus diseaseIssue: August 2009

You Might Also Like:

  • Surgical Approaches to Sinus Disease: The Debate Continues
  • Does Balloon Catheter Sinuplasty Have a Role in the Surgical Management of Pediatric Sinus Disease?
  • Frontal Sinus Drillout Viable for Frontal Sinus Disease
  • Dupilumab, Functional Endoscopic Sinus Surgery Equally Effective in Reducing Chronic Rhinosinusitis with Nasal Polyps Symptoms

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

The Triological SocietyENTtoday is a publication of The Triological Society.

Polls

Would you choose a concierge physician as your PCP?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...
  • Polls Archive

Top Articles for Residents

  • Applications Open for Resident Members of ENTtoday Edit Board
  • How To Provide Helpful Feedback To Residents
  • Call for Resident Bowl Questions
  • New Standardized Otolaryngology Curriculum Launching July 1 Should Be Valuable Resource For Physicians Around The World
  • Do Training Programs Give Otolaryngology Residents the Necessary Tools to Do Productive Research?
  • Popular this Week
  • Most Popular
  • Most Recent
    • A Journey Through Pay Inequity: A Physician’s Firsthand Account

    • The Dramatic Rise in Tongue Tie and Lip Tie Treatment

    • Otolaryngologists Are Still Debating the Effectiveness of Tongue Tie Treatment

    • Is Middle Ear Pressure Affected by Continuous Positive Airway Pressure Use?

    • Rating Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Severity: How Do Two Common Instruments Compare?

    • The Dramatic Rise in Tongue Tie and Lip Tie Treatment

    • Rating Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Severity: How Do Two Common Instruments Compare?

    • Is Middle Ear Pressure Affected by Continuous Positive Airway Pressure Use?

    • Otolaryngologists Are Still Debating the Effectiveness of Tongue Tie Treatment

    • Complications for When Physicians Change a Maiden Name

    • Excitement Around Gene Therapy for Hearing Restoration
    • “Small” Acts of Kindness
    • How To: Endoscopic Total Maxillectomy Without Facial Skin Incision
    • Science Communities Must Speak Out When Policies Threaten Health and Safety
    • Observation Most Cost-Effective in Addressing AECRS in Absence of Bacterial Infection

Follow Us

  • Contact Us
  • About Us
  • Advertise
  • The Triological Society
  • The Laryngoscope
  • Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use
  • Cookies

Wiley

Copyright © 2025 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc. All rights reserved, including rights for text and data mining and training of artificial technologies or similar technologies. ISSN 1559-4939