• Home
  • Practice Focus
    • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
    • Head and Neck
    • Laryngology
    • Otology/Neurotology
    • Pediatric
    • Rhinology
    • Sleep Medicine
    • How I Do It
    • TRIO Best Practices
  • Business of Medicine
    • Health Policy
    • Legal Matters
    • Practice Management
    • Tech Talk
    • AI
  • Literature Reviews
    • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
    • Head and Neck
    • Laryngology
    • Otology/Neurotology
    • Pediatric
    • Rhinology
    • Sleep Medicine
  • Career
    • Medical Education
    • Professional Development
    • Resident Focus
  • ENT Perspectives
    • ENT Expressions
    • Everyday Ethics
    • From TRIO
    • The Great Debate
    • Letter From the Editor
    • Rx: Wellness
    • The Voice
    • Viewpoint
  • TRIO Resources
    • Triological Society
    • The Laryngoscope
    • Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology
    • TRIO Combined Sections Meetings
    • COSM
    • Related Otolaryngology Events
  • Search

FDA Approves First Sublingual Allergy Immunotherapy Agents

by Cheryl Alkon • June 1, 2014

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
Print-Friendly Version

You Might Also Like

  • Sublingual Immunotherapy a Potential Treatment for Allergic Rhinitis
  • Immunotherapy Benefits for Treating Allergic Rhinitis
  • Abbreviated Vaccine Treatment May Be an Effective Alternative to Three to Five Years of Allergy Shots
  • Sublingual Immunotherapy (SLIT) Quality of Life Outcomes
Explore This Issue
June 2014

In April, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved three sublingual oral immunotherapy (SLIT) agents, the first to be approved in the United States.

Oralair, from GREER Laboratories, which is indicated for grass pollen-induced allergic rhinitis with or without conjunctivitis confirmed by positive skin test or in vitro testing for grass pollen-specific immunoglobulin E antibodies for any of five grass species (Sweet Vernal, Orchard, Perennial Rye, Timothy, and Kentucky Blue grasses), received FDA approval on April 1 of this year. Two weeks later, the FDA approved Merck’s Grastek, which treats those allergic to Timothy grass. And, just three days later, the FDA gave the go-ahead to Merck’s Ragwitek, a treatment for ragweed allergies.

These three medications are the first FDA-approved allergy treatments to be administered sublingually to help desensitize a patient to a particular allergen or group of allergens. In the U.S., an estimated 7.5 million people are allergic to Timothy and other grass pollens, while approximately 4.5 million people are allergic to short ragweed pollen.

How They Work

“This is a revolutionary change in the way the patient undergoes desensitization to allergens by providing immunotherapy, yet the effects of providing it appear to be essentially the same as injection therapy,” said Bradley Marple, MD, professor and vice chairman of the department of otolaryngology-head and neck surgery and an associate dean for graduate medical education at the University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center in Dallas. Dr. Marple is also a member of ENTtoday’s editorial advisory board.

Historically, allergy treatment has been a three-tiered process, said Dr. Marple. The first tier involves avoiding the allergen altogether, though some, like pollen, can be hard to hide from as the spring season unfolds. The second tier involves the use of nasal steroids, nasal irrigation, and antihistamines. If allergy symptoms persist, immunotherapy is recommended. “This translates into patients needing to be somewhat tethered to a physician’s office, and it’s kind of a hardship for patients who live removed from the office and who have busy schedules,” said Dr. Marple.

There’s also the fear factor. “Many patients do not pursue immunotherapy because some patients don’t like needles and are scared of shots,” said Nathan Sautter, MD, an assistant professor of otolaryngology at Oregon Health and Science University in Portland.

But with oral immunotherapy, the antigens are absorbed through the mucosa and then migrate through the lymphatic system and into the lymph nodes, where they works with the immune system to help desensitize the body to an allergen, said Dr. Marple. The patient only needs to be observed for potential anaphylaxis after the first pill is taken; if there’s no reaction, the patient can self-administer at home for the remainder of the treatment. The regimen typically starts 12 to 16 weeks before the grass/ragweed season begins and may continue for up to three years.

While this form of immunotherapy is new to the United States, it has been used safely in Europe for about two decades, said Dr. Sautter. Some physicians in the U.S. have also used allergy serums sublingually through off-label prescription. “The advantage of having FDA approval for these tablets means the patient receives the same dose of the medication every time in a form that is more effectively absorbed under the tongue,” he said.

The risk of anaphylaxis and throat swelling is decreased with oral immunotherapy compared with injections, which is why patients can move out of the physician’s office after the first treatment; however, all patients on oral immunotherapy are advised to have a readily accessible dose of an auto-injectable epinephrine in case a problem occurs away from the physician’s office.

Who Benefits

“For people who have more persistent seasonal allergic rhinitis but who haven’t tried injection therapy, these medications are likely to become a new form of treating allergies without shots,” said Dr. Marple. Oralair is approved for patients as young as five years old, and Grastek is approved for those aged 10 and older. “It’s ideal for pediatric patients, because children are really not big fans of having an injection every one to two weeks,” said Dr. Marple.

But not all patients benefit from oral immunotherapy, said Dr. Sautter. “What I’ve seen estimated is up to an average of 30% reduction in allergic symptoms in every patient,” he said. “Some people will derive more benefits and some will derive less. In some patients, allergy symptoms will go away completely.”

Oral immunotherapy is not recommended for patients with severe, unstable, or uncontrolled asthma, those who may have certain underlying medical conditions that are not compatible with severe allergic reactions, those who may be allergic to the ingredients in the medication itself, or those who are on beta blockers, which can interact poorly with oral immunotherapy.

What Otolaryngologists Need to Know

Physicians who treat patients with grass or ragweed allergies should know that there’s an alternative to allergy shots, said Linda Cox, MD, the immediate past president of the American Academy of Allergy, Asthma and Immunology. “As far as we know, serious side effects are rare, and from a positive standpoint, patients have a new way to treat seasonal allergy.”

The cost to patients for allergy treatments varies with the number of allergies being treated as well as the frequency with which the shots are given, but Dr. Sautter said that a good estimate for one month of allergy shots is approximately $75. Citing a Merck press release, Dr. Sautter added that the cost of one Grastek or Ragwitek pill is $8, or $240 for a one-month supply.

“A good estimate is that sublingual tablets are about three times more expensive than shots,” said Dr. Sautter. “In this case, you are paying for the ‘convenience factor’ as well as the fact that it is a new drug, and I would expect cost to decrease over time as more sublingual tablets enter the market.”


Cheryl Alkon is a freelance medical writer based in Massachusetts.

What’s Next in Allergy Treatment

What’s Next in Allergy Treatment

Other promising allergy treatments are being developed, said Dr. Cox. Circassia, based in the U.K., is developing an effective injectable treatment for cat allergy, while Pollinex Quattro, developed by Allergy Therapeutics, also based in the U.K. and known as Grass MATA MPL in the U.S., is a four-injection method to treat grass allergy in as few as three weeks, she said.

But with new oral immunotherapy treatment now available in the U.S., there’s a new “proof of concept,” said Dr. Marple. If you can desensitize patients to a number of grasses using oral immunotherapy, he said, you can do it for any antigen. “I’d be surprised if other antigen companies aren’t lining up in the pipeline for development.”—CA

Pages: 1 2 3 | Multi-Page

Filed Under: Allergy, Features, Practice Focus Tagged With: allergy, SLITIssue: June 2014

You Might Also Like:

  • Sublingual Immunotherapy a Potential Treatment for Allergic Rhinitis
  • Immunotherapy Benefits for Treating Allergic Rhinitis
  • Abbreviated Vaccine Treatment May Be an Effective Alternative to Three to Five Years of Allergy Shots
  • Sublingual Immunotherapy (SLIT) Quality of Life Outcomes

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

The Triological SocietyENTtoday is a publication of The Triological Society.

Polls

Would you choose a concierge physician as your PCP?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...
  • Polls Archive

Top Articles for Residents

  • Applications Open for Resident Members of ENTtoday Edit Board
  • How To Provide Helpful Feedback To Residents
  • Call for Resident Bowl Questions
  • New Standardized Otolaryngology Curriculum Launching July 1 Should Be Valuable Resource For Physicians Around The World
  • Do Training Programs Give Otolaryngology Residents the Necessary Tools to Do Productive Research?
  • Popular this Week
  • Most Popular
  • Most Recent
    • A Journey Through Pay Inequity: A Physician’s Firsthand Account

    • The Dramatic Rise in Tongue Tie and Lip Tie Treatment

    • Otolaryngologists Are Still Debating the Effectiveness of Tongue Tie Treatment

    • Is Middle Ear Pressure Affected by Continuous Positive Airway Pressure Use?

    • Rating Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Severity: How Do Two Common Instruments Compare?

    • The Dramatic Rise in Tongue Tie and Lip Tie Treatment

    • Rating Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Severity: How Do Two Common Instruments Compare?

    • Is Middle Ear Pressure Affected by Continuous Positive Airway Pressure Use?

    • Otolaryngologists Are Still Debating the Effectiveness of Tongue Tie Treatment

    • Complications for When Physicians Change a Maiden Name

    • Excitement Around Gene Therapy for Hearing Restoration
    • “Small” Acts of Kindness
    • How To: Endoscopic Total Maxillectomy Without Facial Skin Incision
    • Science Communities Must Speak Out When Policies Threaten Health and Safety
    • Observation Most Cost-Effective in Addressing AECRS in Absence of Bacterial Infection

Follow Us

  • Contact Us
  • About Us
  • Advertise
  • The Triological Society
  • The Laryngoscope
  • Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use
  • Cookies

Wiley

Copyright © 2025 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc. All rights reserved, including rights for text and data mining and training of artificial technologies or similar technologies. ISSN 1559-4939