• Home
  • Practice Focus
    • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
    • Head and Neck
    • Laryngology
    • Otology/Neurotology
    • Pediatric
    • Rhinology
    • Sleep Medicine
    • How I Do It
    • TRIO Best Practices
  • Business of Medicine
    • Health Policy
    • Legal Matters
    • Practice Management
    • Tech Talk
    • AI
  • Literature Reviews
    • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
    • Head and Neck
    • Laryngology
    • Otology/Neurotology
    • Pediatric
    • Rhinology
    • Sleep Medicine
  • Career
    • Medical Education
    • Professional Development
    • Resident Focus
  • ENT Perspectives
    • ENT Expressions
    • Everyday Ethics
    • From TRIO
    • The Great Debate
    • Letter From the Editor
    • Rx: Wellness
    • The Voice
    • Viewpoint
  • TRIO Resources
    • Triological Society
    • The Laryngoscope
    • Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology
    • TRIO Combined Sections Meetings
    • COSM
    • Related Otolaryngology Events
  • Search

Health Reform to Insure 32 Million: Are you ready for them?

by Geri Aston • May 2, 2010

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
Print-Friendly Version

The new health system reform law is expected to reduce the number of uninsured Americans by 32 million people, and that means more paying patients for physician practices. Many doctors, however, worry that the law’s lack of Medicare payment reform and medical malpractice caps will exacerbate a looming physician shortage. This raises questions about how successful the law will be in increasing health care access.

You Might Also Like

  • A Myth of Modern Medicine: ‘There are 40 million Americans with No Access to Health Care’
  • Health Care as a Commodity: Competition should be focus of health reform, lecturer says
  • Health Reform Perks: Employer tax credits could benefit your practice
  • A Blessing and a Curse: Health care reform comes at a steep price
Explore This Issue
May 2010

The Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act, signed into law on March 23, takes a gradual approach to expanding health insurance access. This tactic aims to avoid disrupting the insurance system, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Secretary Kathleen Sebelius said in an April speech. The reforms will “fit together like puzzle pieces, each one leading logically to the next,” she said.

President Obama signing the health reform bill

President Obama signing the health reform bill

The first changes that could result in more insured patients are the development of state-based high-risk insurance pools for people who don’t have coverage due to preexisting conditions, health insurance tax credits to encourage small businesses to purchase coverage, and a number of insurance market reforms designed to protect and expand coverage. These provisions begin this year.

But the biggest reforms start in 2014. That’s when the mandate for individuals to buy insurance, income-related tax credits to help individuals and families afford coverage, and penalties for businesses that don’t provide insurance kick in. At the same time, state-based health insurance exchanges, which aim to provide affordable coverage options, are supposed get off the ground.

A mandatory expansion of Medicaid eligibility, which will allow very low-income childless adults to enroll, also is slated for 2014. The law will reduce the number of non-elderly uninsured Americans by 32 million by 2019, according to the Congressional Budget Office (CBO). Of that figure, about 16 million would get their coverage through Medicaid and the Children’s Health Insurance Program.

“Having 32 million more people insured is good for America,” said Michael M.E. Johns, MD, an otolaryngologist and chancellor of Emory University in Atlanta. “Those (physicians) who accept Medicaid and those who are seeing uninsured patients should see some benefit.”

The American Medical Association estimates that physicians provided $24 billion in charity care in 2008, much of it to uninsured patients. The law is not expected to eliminate the problem of the uninsured, however. The CBO estimates that 23 million non-elderly adults—about one-third of them illegal immigrants—will remain without coverage.

A Timeline of Health Insurance Provisions

MARCH 2010: Small business tax credit of up to 35 percent of premiums begins, starting with tax year 2010.

APRIL 2010: States can expand Medicaid to childless adults up to 133 percent of the federal poverty level (FPL).

JUNE 2010: Temporary state high-risk pools for uninsured people with preexisting conditions are to begin.

  • Temporary reinsurance program for early retirees is to begin.

SEPTEMBER 2010: Health plans can’t impose lifetime limits or unreasonable annual limits on dollar value of coverage.

  • Insurers can’t rescind coverage, except for enrollee fraud.
  • Insurers must cover dependents up to age 26.

2013: The federal government creates Consumer Operated and Oriented Plan program to foster creation of non-profit, member-run health insurers.

2014:

  • States must expand Medicaid to all non-Medicare eligible individuals with incomes up to 133 percent of the FPL.
  • Insurers can’t impose preexisting condition exclusions.
  • Premium rates can only vary depending on family size, rating area, age and tobacco use.
  • Guaranteed availability and renewability of individual and group coverage begins.
  • Individual health insurance mandate begins.
  • Sliding-scale subsidies that cap health insurance premiums and cost-sharing at a percentage of household income become available for individuals below 400 percent of the FPL.
  • •Guaranteed availability and renewability of individual and group coverage begins.
  • Sliding-scale subsidies that cap health insurance premiums and cost-sharing at a percentage of household income become available for individuals below 400 percent of the FPL.

2015: State-based insurance exchanges must be self-sustaining.

2017: States must pay a share of the new mandatory Medicaid expansion.

2018: Excise tax on employer-sponsored “Cadillac” health plans kicks in.

Sources: Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act, Kaiser Family Foundation, National Governors Association

What the Bill Doesn’t Address

While the act includes many laudable changes, the provisions it lacks raise much concern, says Gavin Setzen, MD, chair of the American Academy of Otolaryngology—Head and Neck Surgery Board of Governors. A major disappointment for physicians is lawmakers’ failure to pass Medicare payment reform as part of the law. Although, in April, Congress again delayed the 21 percent Medicare physician payment cut, this time until June 1, it has not replaced what physicians consider a flawed reimbursement formula.

The financial pressure physicians would face if the Medicare cut occurs would worsen a projected physician shortage, Dr. Setzen said. The Association of American Medical Colleges predicts the U.S. will have between 124,000 and 159,000 too few physicians by 2025.

A recent survey of more than 14,000 surgeons and anesthesiologists by the American College of Surgeons found that 37 percent will change their Medicare status to nonparticipating if the cut goes through, and 29 percent will opt out of the program for two years and privately contract with Medicare patients. Of the 31 percent of respondents who plan to continue Medicare participation, three-fourths plan on making some change in their practice in the next 12 months. Sixty-nine percent plan to limit the number of Medicare patient appointments.

The law’s medical malpractice reform provision also is a missed opportunity, Dr. Setzen said. Physicians have stressed that a cap on noneconomic damages is another important part of health system reform, but the act includes no such limit. The measure authorizes funding for five-year state demonstration programs to develop, implement and evaluate alternatives to the current system. “I don’t see how that is going to do anything meaningful in a reasonable timeframe,” Dr. Setzen said.

Dr. Setzen and others expressed concern about the law’s Medicaid eligibility expansion. Many doctors accept Medicaid patients because they believe they have an obligation to those patients, he said. The payment rates are so low, however, and the administrative burden is so high that providing care to Medicaid patients is essentially equivalent to charity care, he said.

The law increases primary care physicians’ Medicaid payment rates to the Medicare level, but that provision doesn’t apply to specialists, such as otolaryngologists, Drs. Setzen and Johns noted. The low reimbursement level for specialists raises questions about how many of them would be able to afford taking on newly covered Medicaid patients, Dr. Setzen said.

The combination of the Medicare payment cut threat, low Medicaid reimbursement rates and physicians’ medical malpractice issues could limit the health system reform law’s success, Dr. Setzen said. “When you take an already burdened system and there is such a strain with respect to workforce and you introduce 32 million people, access by necessity is going to be limited,” he said.

The act establishes a National Health Care Workforce Commission that will evaluate whether the demand for health care workers is being met and recommend solutions. “That’s something we’re very interested in—how the commission will be structured, what it will do,” Dr. Johns said.

Fear and uncertainty exist in the medical community about the new law’s implications, Dr. Setzen said. “A lot of people are waiting to see how this unfolds.”

It is unclear how the individual mandate and the penalties for businesses that don’t provide coverage will pan out, Dr. Setzen said, pointing out that some individuals and employers could opt to pay the fines rather than buy insurance. “Because the penalties are low and incremental, I think a lot of patients will pay the penalty in the first and second years and still show up in the ER,” he added.

Given the budget crises in the states, physicians also worry whether the state health insurance exchanges are financially sustainable. If the states can’t afford to operate the exchanges, they could become a federal responsibility, Dr. Setzen said. “Is the government the best entity to run the health care system? I’m not convinced of that,” he said. It’s also unclear whether some states will want to create exchanges, Dr. Johns noted. If they don’t, the federal government can step in and develop them. “How that will work and whether that will work remains to be seen,” he said.

The law’s true impact won’t be known until the regulations are written, Dr. Johns said. “There are going to be thousands of pages of regulations. That will be the interesting part of it.”

Pages: 1 2 3 4 | Multi-Page

Filed Under: Departments, Health Policy Tagged With: affordable care act, healthcare reform, insurance, Medicare, policy, reimbursement, taxIssue: May 2010

You Might Also Like:

  • A Myth of Modern Medicine: ‘There are 40 million Americans with No Access to Health Care’
  • Health Care as a Commodity: Competition should be focus of health reform, lecturer says
  • Health Reform Perks: Employer tax credits could benefit your practice
  • A Blessing and a Curse: Health care reform comes at a steep price

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

The Triological SocietyENTtoday is a publication of The Triological Society.

Polls

Would you choose a concierge physician as your PCP?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...
  • Polls Archive

Top Articles for Residents

  • Applications Open for Resident Members of ENTtoday Edit Board
  • How To Provide Helpful Feedback To Residents
  • Call for Resident Bowl Questions
  • New Standardized Otolaryngology Curriculum Launching July 1 Should Be Valuable Resource For Physicians Around The World
  • Do Training Programs Give Otolaryngology Residents the Necessary Tools to Do Productive Research?
  • Popular this Week
  • Most Popular
  • Most Recent
    • A Journey Through Pay Inequity: A Physician’s Firsthand Account

    • The Dramatic Rise in Tongue Tie and Lip Tie Treatment

    • Otolaryngologists Are Still Debating the Effectiveness of Tongue Tie Treatment

    • Rating Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Severity: How Do Two Common Instruments Compare?

    • Is Middle Ear Pressure Affected by Continuous Positive Airway Pressure Use?

    • The Dramatic Rise in Tongue Tie and Lip Tie Treatment

    • Rating Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Severity: How Do Two Common Instruments Compare?

    • Is Middle Ear Pressure Affected by Continuous Positive Airway Pressure Use?

    • Otolaryngologists Are Still Debating the Effectiveness of Tongue Tie Treatment

    • Complications for When Physicians Change a Maiden Name

    • Excitement Around Gene Therapy for Hearing Restoration
    • “Small” Acts of Kindness
    • How To: Endoscopic Total Maxillectomy Without Facial Skin Incision
    • Science Communities Must Speak Out When Policies Threaten Health and Safety
    • Observation Most Cost-Effective in Addressing AECRS in Absence of Bacterial Infection

Follow Us

  • Contact Us
  • About Us
  • Advertise
  • The Triological Society
  • The Laryngoscope
  • Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use
  • Cookies

Wiley

Copyright © 2025 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc. All rights reserved, including rights for text and data mining and training of artificial technologies or similar technologies. ISSN 1559-4939