• Home
  • Practice Focus
    • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
    • Head and Neck
    • Laryngology
    • Otology/Neurotology
    • Pediatric
    • Rhinology
    • Sleep Medicine
    • How I Do It
    • TRIO Best Practices
  • Business of Medicine
    • Health Policy
    • Legal Matters
    • Practice Management
    • Tech Talk
    • AI
  • Literature Reviews
    • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
    • Head and Neck
    • Laryngology
    • Otology/Neurotology
    • Pediatric
    • Rhinology
    • Sleep Medicine
  • Career
    • Medical Education
    • Professional Development
    • Resident Focus
  • ENT Perspectives
    • ENT Expressions
    • Everyday Ethics
    • From TRIO
    • The Great Debate
    • Letter From the Editor
    • Rx: Wellness
    • The Voice
    • Viewpoint
  • TRIO Resources
    • Triological Society
    • The Laryngoscope
    • Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology
    • TRIO Combined Sections Meetings
    • COSM
    • Related Otolaryngology Events
  • Search

HN Cancer Patients with Negative Imaging History Derive Limited Benefit from Subsequent PET-CT

by Christine G. Gourin, MD • October 1, 2013

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
Print-Friendly Version

What is the utility of 12- and 24-month PET-CT surveillance in detecting recurrence in patients with head and neck cancer?

Background: The optimal use and timing of PET-CT in the surveillance of patients with head and neck cancer remains a point of debate without clear guidelines. A three-month post-treatment PET-CT scan has a high negative predictive value and is a favorable prognostic factor. In such patients, it is unclear whether further PET/CT surveillance is useful or cost effective.

You Might Also Like

  • PET/CT Useful for Head and Neck Cancers, with Limitations
  • Study Raises Concern over Imaging after Thyroid Cancer
  • PET-CT is Cost-Effective for N2 Disease After Chemoradiotherapy
  • Clinicians Question Usefulness of Multiple Post-Treatment PET/CT Scans for Head and Neck Cancer
Explore This Issue
October 2013

Study design: Retrospective review of patients with a negative three-month post-treatment imaging who underwent additional subsequent surveillance imaging with PET-CT.

Setting: Stanford University Medical Center, Palo Alto, Calif.

Synopsis: A total of 175 patients met study criteria, with all patients undergoing a 12-month post-treatment PET-CT and 77 patients also undergoing a 24-month post-treatment PET-CT scan. Head and neck tumors were a heterogeneous group, with the oropharynx representing the primary site in 49 percent of patients. At 12 months, PET-CT detected recurrence in 15 patients (9 percent), two of which were local, three regional and 10 distant. At 24 months, PET-CT detected recurrent disease in three patients (4 percent), all of whom had distant disease. Locoregional recurrence was identified in 13 patients (5 percent) on clinical grounds alone during the study period, in six patients during the three- to 12 month post-treatment interval and in seven patients in the 12- to 24-month interval, all of whom had previously had negative imaging. Salvage surgery was performed in 89 percent of all patients with locoregional recurrence. There was no significant difference in three-year overall survival and disease-specific survival rates between patients whose recurrence was detected by PET-CT (60 percent and 40 percent) and patients whose recurrence was detected by clinical examination (54 percent and 46 percent).

Bottom line: Head and neck cancer patients with negative three-month imaging appear to derive limited benefit from subsequent routine PET-CT surveillance. No survival advantage was demonstrated for patients with PET-CT-detected recurrence compared to those detected clinically.

Citation: Ho AS, Tsao GJ, Chen FW, et al. Impact of positron emission tomography/computed tomography surveillance at 12 and 24 months for detecting head and neck cancer recurrence. Cancer. 2013;119:1349-1356.

—Reviewed by Christine G. Gourin, MD

Filed Under: Head and Neck, Head and Neck, Literature Reviews, Practice Focus Tagged With: head and neck cancer, Imaging, PET-CT surveillanceIssue: October 2013

You Might Also Like:

  • PET/CT Useful for Head and Neck Cancers, with Limitations
  • Study Raises Concern over Imaging after Thyroid Cancer
  • PET-CT is Cost-Effective for N2 Disease After Chemoradiotherapy
  • Clinicians Question Usefulness of Multiple Post-Treatment PET/CT Scans for Head and Neck Cancer

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

The Triological SocietyENTtoday is a publication of The Triological Society.

Polls

Would you choose a concierge physician as your PCP?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...
  • Polls Archive

Top Articles for Residents

  • Applications Open for Resident Members of ENTtoday Edit Board
  • How To Provide Helpful Feedback To Residents
  • Call for Resident Bowl Questions
  • New Standardized Otolaryngology Curriculum Launching July 1 Should Be Valuable Resource For Physicians Around The World
  • Do Training Programs Give Otolaryngology Residents the Necessary Tools to Do Productive Research?
  • Popular this Week
  • Most Popular
  • Most Recent
    • A Journey Through Pay Inequity: A Physician’s Firsthand Account

    • The Dramatic Rise in Tongue Tie and Lip Tie Treatment

    • Otolaryngologists Are Still Debating the Effectiveness of Tongue Tie Treatment

    • Is Middle Ear Pressure Affected by Continuous Positive Airway Pressure Use?

    • Rating Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Severity: How Do Two Common Instruments Compare?

    • The Dramatic Rise in Tongue Tie and Lip Tie Treatment

    • Rating Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Severity: How Do Two Common Instruments Compare?

    • Is Middle Ear Pressure Affected by Continuous Positive Airway Pressure Use?

    • Otolaryngologists Are Still Debating the Effectiveness of Tongue Tie Treatment

    • Complications for When Physicians Change a Maiden Name

    • Excitement Around Gene Therapy for Hearing Restoration
    • “Small” Acts of Kindness
    • How To: Endoscopic Total Maxillectomy Without Facial Skin Incision
    • Science Communities Must Speak Out When Policies Threaten Health and Safety
    • Observation Most Cost-Effective in Addressing AECRS in Absence of Bacterial Infection

Follow Us

  • Contact Us
  • About Us
  • Advertise
  • The Triological Society
  • The Laryngoscope
  • Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use
  • Cookies

Wiley

Copyright © 2025 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc. All rights reserved, including rights for text and data mining and training of artificial technologies or similar technologies. ISSN 1559-4939