• Home
  • Practice Focus
    • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
    • Head and Neck
    • Laryngology
    • Otology/Neurotology
    • Pediatric
    • Rhinology
    • Sleep Medicine
    • How I Do It
    • TRIO Best Practices
  • Business of Medicine
    • Health Policy
    • Legal Matters
    • Practice Management
    • Tech Talk
    • AI
  • Literature Reviews
    • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
    • Head and Neck
    • Laryngology
    • Otology/Neurotology
    • Pediatric
    • Rhinology
    • Sleep Medicine
  • Career
    • Medical Education
    • Professional Development
    • Resident Focus
  • ENT Perspectives
    • ENT Expressions
    • Everyday Ethics
    • From TRIO
    • The Great Debate
    • Letter From the Editor
    • Rx: Wellness
    • The Voice
    • Viewpoint
  • TRIO Resources
    • Triological Society
    • The Laryngoscope
    • Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology
    • TRIO Combined Sections Meetings
    • COSM
    • Related Otolaryngology Events
  • Search

How Some Major Accountable Care Organizations Work

by Bryn Nelson, PhD • April 1, 2013

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
Print-Friendly Version

Medicare Shared Savings Program

Number of participants: 220, with more set to join Jan. 1, 2014.

You Might Also Like

  • Otolaryngologists Prepare for the Era of Accountable Care Organizations (ACOs)
  • Otolaryngologists Missing from Leadership Ranks of Accountable Care Organizations
  • Quality Over Quantity: Accountable care organizations link physician payments to hospital outcomes
  • AAO-HNS14: Otolaryngologists Recommend Cautious Approach in Transition to Accountable Care Organizations
Explore This Issue
April 2013

Run by: Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS).

How it works: Participants include many smaller and less experienced organizations that may need more time and resources to integrate their health care delivery. ACOs can choose between a one-sided, shared savings model with no downside risk and a two-sided model that offers more reward in exchange for assuming some financial risk.

To learn more: cms.gov/sharedsavingsprogram.

Pioneer ACO Program

Number of participants: 32

Run by: The Center for Medicare and Medicaid Innovation at CMS.

How it works: Participants are experienced in coordinating patient care, and many are already operating under ACO-like arrangements. The first two years feature several shared savings and risk models, with an option in the third year for successful groups to transition to a population-based payment model.

To learn more: innovation.cms.gov/initiatives/Pioneer-ACO-Model.

Physician Group Practice Transition Demonstration

Number of participants: 3 (of the original 10 participants, 7 have joined the Pioneer or Shared Savings models).

Run by: CMS

How it works: Now winding down, this demonstration effectively extended Medicare’s first pay-for-performance initiative for physicians, the Physician Group Practice Demonstration that ran from 2005 to 2010. Like the initial program, the transition demonstration features a shared savings payment model under which participants can earn incentive payments if they meet quality performance benchmarks.

To learn more: Visit cms.gov/Medicare and click on “Demonstration Projects.

Medicaid-Only ACOs

How many participants: 10, with more in development.

Run by: Individual states, including Massachusetts, Colorado, Minnesota, New Jersey and Oregon (Oregon runs two separate ACOs).

How they work: States are applying their own experimental approaches, but most involve risk-based managed care as the main delivery and payment system, with coordinated communication and shared budgets. More states are expected to form these organizations to more efficiently handle their Medicaid populations; others have set up private contracts or are operating ACOs through private managed care plans.

To learn more: The Kaiser Family Foundation has a good overview of Medicaid ACOs at kff.org/medicaid/upload/8319.pdf.

Private ACOs

How many participants: 184 private entities, not including 49 hybrid Medicare-private ACOs operating under the Pioneer or Shared Savings models.

Run by: A variety of entities. Although most ACOs were initially sponsored by hospital systems, those backed by physician groups are quickly gaining ground. Insurers and community-based organizations are also getting their own ACOs off the ground.

Pages: 1 2 | Single Page

Filed Under: Features Tagged With: ACO, CMS, healthcare reform, Medicare, policyIssue: April 2013

You Might Also Like:

  • Otolaryngologists Prepare for the Era of Accountable Care Organizations (ACOs)
  • Otolaryngologists Missing from Leadership Ranks of Accountable Care Organizations
  • Quality Over Quantity: Accountable care organizations link physician payments to hospital outcomes
  • AAO-HNS14: Otolaryngologists Recommend Cautious Approach in Transition to Accountable Care Organizations

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

The Triological SocietyENTtoday is a publication of The Triological Society.

Polls

Would you choose a concierge physician as your PCP?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...
  • Polls Archive

Top Articles for Residents

  • Applications Open for Resident Members of ENTtoday Edit Board
  • How To Provide Helpful Feedback To Residents
  • Call for Resident Bowl Questions
  • New Standardized Otolaryngology Curriculum Launching July 1 Should Be Valuable Resource For Physicians Around The World
  • Do Training Programs Give Otolaryngology Residents the Necessary Tools to Do Productive Research?
  • Popular this Week
  • Most Popular
  • Most Recent
    • A Journey Through Pay Inequity: A Physician’s Firsthand Account

    • The Dramatic Rise in Tongue Tie and Lip Tie Treatment

    • Otolaryngologists Are Still Debating the Effectiveness of Tongue Tie Treatment

    • Is Middle Ear Pressure Affected by Continuous Positive Airway Pressure Use?

    • Rating Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Severity: How Do Two Common Instruments Compare?

    • The Dramatic Rise in Tongue Tie and Lip Tie Treatment

    • Rating Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Severity: How Do Two Common Instruments Compare?

    • Is Middle Ear Pressure Affected by Continuous Positive Airway Pressure Use?

    • Otolaryngologists Are Still Debating the Effectiveness of Tongue Tie Treatment

    • Complications for When Physicians Change a Maiden Name

    • Excitement Around Gene Therapy for Hearing Restoration
    • “Small” Acts of Kindness
    • How To: Endoscopic Total Maxillectomy Without Facial Skin Incision
    • Science Communities Must Speak Out When Policies Threaten Health and Safety
    • Observation Most Cost-Effective in Addressing AECRS in Absence of Bacterial Infection

Follow Us

  • Contact Us
  • About Us
  • Advertise
  • The Triological Society
  • The Laryngoscope
  • Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use
  • Cookies

Wiley

Copyright © 2025 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc. All rights reserved, including rights for text and data mining and training of artificial technologies or similar technologies. ISSN 1559-4939