• Home
  • Practice Focus
    • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
    • Head and Neck
    • Laryngology
    • Otology/Neurotology
    • Pediatric
    • Rhinology
    • Sleep Medicine
    • How I Do It
    • TRIO Best Practices
  • Business of Medicine
    • Health Policy
    • Legal Matters
    • Practice Management
    • Tech Talk
    • AI
  • Literature Reviews
    • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
    • Head and Neck
    • Laryngology
    • Otology/Neurotology
    • Pediatric
    • Rhinology
    • Sleep Medicine
  • Career
    • Medical Education
    • Professional Development
    • Resident Focus
  • ENT Perspectives
    • ENT Expressions
    • Everyday Ethics
    • From TRIO
    • The Great Debate
    • Letter From the Editor
    • Rx: Wellness
    • The Voice
    • Viewpoint
  • TRIO Resources
    • Triological Society
    • The Laryngoscope
    • Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology
    • TRIO Combined Sections Meetings
    • COSM
    • Related Otolaryngology Events
  • Search

How To: ‘Parachute’ Technique for Reconstruction of Small Skull Base Defects of the Ventral Skull Base

by Valentin Favier, MD; Johnny Youssef, MD; Romain Kania, MD, PhD; Benjamin Vérillaud, MD, PhD; and Philippe Herman, MD, PhD • December 14, 2020

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
Print-Friendly Version

This “parachute” placement can be used with both autologous free grafts and synthetic materials.

You Might Also Like

  • Can Posterior Septal Nasal Floor Mucosal Flap During Skull Base Reconstruction Repair Cerebrospinal Fluid Leaks?
  • Ethmoidal Arteries with Pedicled Septal Floor Rotational Flaps Are Ideal for Endoscopic Skull Base Reconstruction
  • Novel Bioabsorbable Plate Associated with Lower Leak Risk in Patients Receiving Endoscopic Skull Base Repair
  • How To: Hidden Port Approach to Endoscopic Pericranial Scalp Flap for Anterior Skull Base Reconstruction
Explore This Issue
December 2020

The parachute technique allows the use of both fascia lata and synthetic materials. We present here a skull base reconstruction of a 1.5-cm defect of the planum sphenoidale.

Final view of the two-layer reconstruction using the “parachute” technique.

Final view of the two-layer reconstruction using the “parachute” technique.

A Biodesign duraplasty graft (Cook Biotech, West Lafayette, Ind.) in a size that was approximatively 30% larger was designed. A nonabsorbable polypropylene suture (3/0) is passed through the graft near the center in a U shape. The two strands must be long enough to easily exit the nose. Then, the graft is placed in the subdural space using classic microsurgical instruments (angled endonasal blunt hook and seeker, spoon curettes, blunt angled elevators). A slight tension on the strands allows centering the graft on the defect, and then it is applied against the dura without any pucker—hence the name “parachute technique.” It should be noted that the role of the suture is not to anchor the graft but to center it on the defect. The graft is then covered with fibrin glue to seal the reconstruction and the suture is removed, with back pressure being maintained on the graft with a blunt instrument to avoid displacement. Fibrin glue sealing should be used sparingly between the two reconstruction layers to avoid dead space during resorption.

Then, a second graft designed like the first graft is placed in the extradural space, as a “sandwich” to maintain the dura between two graft layers. At the end of the procedure, fibrin glue sealant is applied. With this parachute closure technique, it is possible to associate a multilayer reconstruction using a mucosal graft or mucosal flaps to cover the graft and surrounding bone. We did not use any nasal packing or postoperative antibiotics.

Patients must follow common postoperative advice such as avoiding straining and Valsalva-like maneuvers. Acetazolamide was prescribed only in case of suspicion of intracranial hypertension. We did not use any lumbar drain.

Results

Sixteen patients were included in the study from 2005 to the present. All patients were operated on by the same surgeon. 

Iatrogenic CSF leaks were addressed by other centers and then closed during another surgical procedure. The mean postoperative follow-up was 24 months (range = 1–101 months). We did not notice any leak recurrence.

View skull base reconstruction of a 1.5-cm defect of the planum sphenoidale using the “parachute” technique. Watch Now

Pages: 1 2 3 | Single Page

Filed Under: How I Do It Tagged With: clinical careIssue: December 2020

You Might Also Like:

  • Can Posterior Septal Nasal Floor Mucosal Flap During Skull Base Reconstruction Repair Cerebrospinal Fluid Leaks?
  • Ethmoidal Arteries with Pedicled Septal Floor Rotational Flaps Are Ideal for Endoscopic Skull Base Reconstruction
  • Novel Bioabsorbable Plate Associated with Lower Leak Risk in Patients Receiving Endoscopic Skull Base Repair
  • How To: Hidden Port Approach to Endoscopic Pericranial Scalp Flap for Anterior Skull Base Reconstruction

The Triological SocietyENTtoday is a publication of The Triological Society.

Polls

Would you choose a concierge physician as your PCP?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...
  • Polls Archive

Top Articles for Residents

  • Applications Open for Resident Members of ENTtoday Edit Board
  • How To Provide Helpful Feedback To Residents
  • Call for Resident Bowl Questions
  • New Standardized Otolaryngology Curriculum Launching July 1 Should Be Valuable Resource For Physicians Around The World
  • Do Training Programs Give Otolaryngology Residents the Necessary Tools to Do Productive Research?
  • Popular this Week
  • Most Popular
  • Most Recent
    • A Journey Through Pay Inequity: A Physician’s Firsthand Account

    • The Dramatic Rise in Tongue Tie and Lip Tie Treatment

    • Otolaryngologists Are Still Debating the Effectiveness of Tongue Tie Treatment

    • Is Middle Ear Pressure Affected by Continuous Positive Airway Pressure Use?

    • Rating Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Severity: How Do Two Common Instruments Compare?

    • The Dramatic Rise in Tongue Tie and Lip Tie Treatment

    • Rating Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Severity: How Do Two Common Instruments Compare?

    • Is Middle Ear Pressure Affected by Continuous Positive Airway Pressure Use?

    • Otolaryngologists Are Still Debating the Effectiveness of Tongue Tie Treatment

    • Complications for When Physicians Change a Maiden Name

    • Excitement Around Gene Therapy for Hearing Restoration
    • “Small” Acts of Kindness
    • How To: Endoscopic Total Maxillectomy Without Facial Skin Incision
    • Science Communities Must Speak Out When Policies Threaten Health and Safety
    • Observation Most Cost-Effective in Addressing AECRS in Absence of Bacterial Infection

Follow Us

  • Contact Us
  • About Us
  • Advertise
  • The Triological Society
  • The Laryngoscope
  • Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use
  • Cookies

Wiley

Copyright © 2025 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc. All rights reserved, including rights for text and data mining and training of artificial technologies or similar technologies. ISSN 1559-4939