• Home
  • Practice Focus
    • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
    • Head and Neck
    • Laryngology
    • Otology/Neurotology
    • Pediatric
    • Rhinology
    • Sleep Medicine
    • How I Do It
    • TRIO Best Practices
  • Business of Medicine
    • Health Policy
    • Legal Matters
    • Practice Management
    • Tech Talk
    • AI
  • Literature Reviews
    • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
    • Head and Neck
    • Laryngology
    • Otology/Neurotology
    • Pediatric
    • Rhinology
    • Sleep Medicine
  • Career
    • Medical Education
    • Professional Development
    • Resident Focus
  • ENT Perspectives
    • ENT Expressions
    • Everyday Ethics
    • From TRIO
    • The Great Debate
    • Letter From the Editor
    • Rx: Wellness
    • The Voice
    • Viewpoint
  • TRIO Resources
    • Triological Society
    • The Laryngoscope
    • Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology
    • TRIO Combined Sections Meetings
    • COSM
    • Related Otolaryngology Events
  • Search

How To: Tension-Free Anterior Rerouting of the Facial Nerve in Management of Jugular Foramen Paragangliomas

by Dedi Kong, MD, Yibo Zhang, MD, PhD, Feitian Li, MD, PhD, Wei Li, MD, PhD, and Chunfu Dai, MD, PhD • July 20, 2021

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
Print-Friendly Version
Figure 1. Schematic illustration of the infratemporal fossa type A approach (IFTA-A) with tension-free anterior rerouting of the FN. A) This intraoperative photograph shows the surgical field around jugular foramen after removing the jugular foramen paragangliomas with the modified surgical procedures. B) This illustration demonstrates anatomic structures around the jugular foramen following tension-free anterior rerouting of the facial nerve. Co = cochlea; FN = facial nerve; ICA = internal carotid artery; Sc = semicircular canal: * = jugular bulb, while the tumor was removed, and inferior petrous sinus was packed with Surgicel.

Figure 1. Schematic illustration of the infratemporal fossa type A approach (IFTA-A) with tension-free anterior rerouting of the FN. A) This intraoperative photograph shows the surgical field around jugular foramen after removing the jugular foramen paragangliomas with the modified surgical procedures. B) This illustration demonstrates anatomic structures around the jugular foramen following tension-free anterior rerouting of the facial nerve. Co = cochlea; FN = facial nerve; ICA = internal carotid artery; Sc = semicircular canal: * = jugular bulb, while the tumor was removed, and inferior petrous sinus was packed with Surgicel.

You Might Also Like

  • Does the Use of Steroids Perioperatively in Parotid Surgery Affect Facial Nerve Outcomes?
  • Optimal Management of Vascular Pedicle Is an Important Concern in Facial Free Flap Reconstruction
  • Multi-institutional Review Offers Basis for Management of Failed Free Flaps to Head and Neck
  • Nuclear Medical Imaging Is Recommended in the Diagnosis and Management of Head and Neck Paragangliomas
Explore This Issue
July 2021

© Kong D, et al. Laryngoscope. DOI: 10.1002/lary.29658

The study included 15 women and five men, with a mean age of 49.58 years (range: 24–69 years). Eight (40%) and 12 (60%) patients were diagnosed with Fisch class C2 and C3 tumors, respectively.

GTR was achieved in 19 patients (95%). One patient did not obtain GTR due to extensive intraoperative bleeding and tumor infiltration of the internal carotid artery. Eighteen patients (90%) had an estimated blood loss of 100 to 450 mL (mean: 265 mL). The blood loss in the other two patients was 1,000 mL and 1,200 mL. Overall, the average blood loss was 360 mL, and the mean surgical time was 3.97 hours (range: 2.92–4.75 hours).

The preoperative FN function was HB grade I in all patients. FN function was HB grade I–II in 18 patients (90%) at the last postoperative follow-up. These patients had a positive response to an electrical stimulation of 0.5 mA after tumor removal, while an FN monitor was applied intraoperatively. The remaining two patients showed HB grade III FN function.

Five patients (25%) displayed dysfunction of the preoperative lower cranial nerves (CNs). One patient (5%) experienced newly developed lower CN IX deficit postoperatively. Cerebrospinal fluid leakage occurred in one patient (5%) intraoperatively; this leakage was successfully repaired with a muscle plug and abdominal fat packing. One patient (5%) experienced brain infarction on postoperative day three; this patient recovered completely. There was no other complication associated with surgery. One patient with GTR was recurrent four years postoperatively. The duration of follow-up ranged from 15 to 94 months (mean: 43.35 months).

Pages: 1 2 | Single Page

Filed Under: Head and Neck, How I Do It Tagged With: clinical outcomes, facial nerve, surgeryIssue: July 2021

You Might Also Like:

  • Does the Use of Steroids Perioperatively in Parotid Surgery Affect Facial Nerve Outcomes?
  • Optimal Management of Vascular Pedicle Is an Important Concern in Facial Free Flap Reconstruction
  • Multi-institutional Review Offers Basis for Management of Failed Free Flaps to Head and Neck
  • Nuclear Medical Imaging Is Recommended in the Diagnosis and Management of Head and Neck Paragangliomas

The Triological SocietyENTtoday is a publication of The Triological Society.

Polls

Would you choose a concierge physician as your PCP?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...
  • Polls Archive

Top Articles for Residents

  • Applications Open for Resident Members of ENTtoday Edit Board
  • How To Provide Helpful Feedback To Residents
  • Call for Resident Bowl Questions
  • New Standardized Otolaryngology Curriculum Launching July 1 Should Be Valuable Resource For Physicians Around The World
  • Do Training Programs Give Otolaryngology Residents the Necessary Tools to Do Productive Research?
  • Popular this Week
  • Most Popular
  • Most Recent
    • A Journey Through Pay Inequity: A Physician’s Firsthand Account

    • The Dramatic Rise in Tongue Tie and Lip Tie Treatment

    • Otolaryngologists Are Still Debating the Effectiveness of Tongue Tie Treatment

    • Is Middle Ear Pressure Affected by Continuous Positive Airway Pressure Use?

    • Rating Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Severity: How Do Two Common Instruments Compare?

    • The Dramatic Rise in Tongue Tie and Lip Tie Treatment

    • Rating Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Severity: How Do Two Common Instruments Compare?

    • Is Middle Ear Pressure Affected by Continuous Positive Airway Pressure Use?

    • Otolaryngologists Are Still Debating the Effectiveness of Tongue Tie Treatment

    • Complications for When Physicians Change a Maiden Name

    • Excitement Around Gene Therapy for Hearing Restoration
    • “Small” Acts of Kindness
    • How To: Endoscopic Total Maxillectomy Without Facial Skin Incision
    • Science Communities Must Speak Out When Policies Threaten Health and Safety
    • Observation Most Cost-Effective in Addressing AECRS in Absence of Bacterial Infection

Follow Us

  • Contact Us
  • About Us
  • Advertise
  • The Triological Society
  • The Laryngoscope
  • Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use
  • Cookies

Wiley

Copyright © 2025 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc. All rights reserved, including rights for text and data mining and training of artificial technologies or similar technologies. ISSN 1559-4939