• Home
  • Practice Focus
    • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
    • Head and Neck
    • Laryngology
    • Otology/Neurotology
    • Pediatric
    • Rhinology
    • Sleep Medicine
    • How I Do It
    • TRIO Best Practices
  • Business of Medicine
    • Health Policy
    • Legal Matters
    • Practice Management
    • Tech Talk
    • AI
  • Literature Reviews
    • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
    • Head and Neck
    • Laryngology
    • Otology/Neurotology
    • Pediatric
    • Rhinology
    • Sleep Medicine
  • Career
    • Medical Education
    • Professional Development
    • Resident Focus
  • ENT Perspectives
    • ENT Expressions
    • Everyday Ethics
    • From TRIO
    • The Great Debate
    • Letter From the Editor
    • Rx: Wellness
    • The Voice
    • Viewpoint
  • TRIO Resources
    • Triological Society
    • The Laryngoscope
    • Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology
    • TRIO Combined Sections Meetings
    • COSM
    • Related Otolaryngology Events
  • Search

HPV Status an Independent Prognostic Factor for Oropharyngeal Cancer Survival

by Erich M. Sturgis, MD, MPH • August 9, 2010

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
Print-Friendly Version

What is the independent effect of human papillomavirus (HPV) on oropharyngeal cancer survival?

You Might Also Like

  • HPV-Positive Oropharnygeal Cancer Has Better Prognosis than Tobacco-Induced Cancer
  • Tests Emerging as Standards for Diagnosing HPV-Positive Oropharyngeal Cancer
  • New Staging System Proposed for HPV-Related Oropharyngeal Cancer
  • In OPSCC, Tumor Location and T Stage More Significant than HPV Status
Explore This Issue
August 2010

Background: HPV has been associated with oropharyngeal cancer risk and appears to underlie the rising incidence of this disease in the U.S. and Europe. HPV-positive oropharyngeal cancers may be associated with a better prognosis than HPV-negative oropharyngeal cancers.

Study design: Retrospective analysis of HPV tumor status and survival of oropharyngeal cancer patients within a phase III randomized trial for stage III/IV squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck, including 360 patients receiving accelerated fractionation (concomitant boost) radiotherapy with concurrent cisplatin (experimental arm) and 361 patients receiving standard fractionation radiotherapy with concurrent cisplatin (control arm)

Setting: Within the multi-institutional cooperative Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) randomized phase III clinical trial (RTOG 0129)

Synopsis: This study presents the retrospective analysis of HPV tumor status and survival of 323 oropharyngeal cancer patients within RTOG 0129. There was no difference in survival associated with treatment arm. However, there was a significantly lower risk (after multivariate adjustment) for death (58 percent lower) or relapse (51 percent lower) for patients with HPV-positive oropharyngeal cancer as compared with patients with HPV-negative oropharyngeal cancer, and a similar protective effect was seen for tumors overexpressing p16 (another marker of HPV). Smoking status (smoker vs. nonsmoker with cutoff set at <10 pack-years) was the second most important prognostic factor after HPV. N-stage was the third critical prognosticator for patients with HPV-positive cancers, while T-stage was the third critical prognosticator for HPV-negative cancers.

This study is limited by the retrospective analysis of HPV status (unavailable for 25 percent of patients) within a prospective trial with two different treatment arms, potential misclassifications of HPV or smoking status, and possible inability to generalize the findings to patients not treated with radiotherapy. The HPV-tested and unavailable groups, however, were similar with respect to baseline characteristics and survival, major misclassifications are unlikely given the expected demographic and stage characteristics of the HPV-positive group, and virtually all stage III/IV surgically treated oropharyngeal patients will also receive radiation. The sophisticated three-way categorization of risk for death from oropharyngeal cancer may lead to the incorporation of HPV status and possibly smoking status into the staging system and will likely result in treatment modifications.

Bottom line: HPV status is a strong independent prognostic factor for survival among patients with oropharyngeal cancer, and the effect of HPV status on survival appears further modified by smoking history.

Reference: Ang KK, Harris J, Wheeler R, et al. Human papillomavirus and survival of patients with oropharyngeal cancer. New Engl J Med. 2010;363(1):24-35.

Pages: 1 2 | Single Page

Filed Under: Laryngology, Literature Reviews Tagged With: clinical, HPV, human papillomavirus, oropharyngeal cancerIssue: August 2010

You Might Also Like:

  • HPV-Positive Oropharnygeal Cancer Has Better Prognosis than Tobacco-Induced Cancer
  • Tests Emerging as Standards for Diagnosing HPV-Positive Oropharyngeal Cancer
  • New Staging System Proposed for HPV-Related Oropharyngeal Cancer
  • In OPSCC, Tumor Location and T Stage More Significant than HPV Status

The Triological SocietyENTtoday is a publication of The Triological Society.

Polls

Would you choose a concierge physician as your PCP?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...
  • Polls Archive

Top Articles for Residents

  • Applications Open for Resident Members of ENTtoday Edit Board
  • How To Provide Helpful Feedback To Residents
  • Call for Resident Bowl Questions
  • New Standardized Otolaryngology Curriculum Launching July 1 Should Be Valuable Resource For Physicians Around The World
  • Do Training Programs Give Otolaryngology Residents the Necessary Tools to Do Productive Research?
  • Popular this Week
  • Most Popular
  • Most Recent
    • A Journey Through Pay Inequity: A Physician’s Firsthand Account

    • The Dramatic Rise in Tongue Tie and Lip Tie Treatment

    • Otolaryngologists Are Still Debating the Effectiveness of Tongue Tie Treatment

    • Is Middle Ear Pressure Affected by Continuous Positive Airway Pressure Use?

    • Rating Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Severity: How Do Two Common Instruments Compare?

    • The Dramatic Rise in Tongue Tie and Lip Tie Treatment

    • Rating Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Severity: How Do Two Common Instruments Compare?

    • Is Middle Ear Pressure Affected by Continuous Positive Airway Pressure Use?

    • Otolaryngologists Are Still Debating the Effectiveness of Tongue Tie Treatment

    • Complications for When Physicians Change a Maiden Name

    • Excitement Around Gene Therapy for Hearing Restoration
    • “Small” Acts of Kindness
    • How To: Endoscopic Total Maxillectomy Without Facial Skin Incision
    • Science Communities Must Speak Out When Policies Threaten Health and Safety
    • Observation Most Cost-Effective in Addressing AECRS in Absence of Bacterial Infection

Follow Us

  • Contact Us
  • About Us
  • Advertise
  • The Triological Society
  • The Laryngoscope
  • Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use
  • Cookies

Wiley

Copyright © 2025 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc. All rights reserved, including rights for text and data mining and training of artificial technologies or similar technologies. ISSN 1559-4939