• Home
  • Practice Focus
    • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
    • Head and Neck
    • Laryngology
    • Otology/Neurotology
    • Pediatric
    • Rhinology
    • Sleep Medicine
    • How I Do It
    • TRIO Best Practices
  • Business of Medicine
    • Health Policy
    • Legal Matters
    • Practice Management
    • Tech Talk
    • AI
  • Literature Reviews
    • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
    • Head and Neck
    • Laryngology
    • Otology/Neurotology
    • Pediatric
    • Rhinology
    • Sleep Medicine
  • Career
    • Medical Education
    • Professional Development
    • Resident Focus
  • ENT Perspectives
    • ENT Expressions
    • Everyday Ethics
    • From TRIO
    • The Great Debate
    • Letter From the Editor
    • Rx: Wellness
    • The Voice
    • Viewpoint
  • TRIO Resources
    • Triological Society
    • The Laryngoscope
    • Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology
    • TRIO Combined Sections Meetings
    • COSM
    • Related Otolaryngology Events
  • Search

In-Office Transnasal Tracheoesophageal Punctures Yield Good Results

by Thomas R. Collins • November 1, 2009

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
Print-Friendly Version

Twenty-three (59%) of the patients had had previous radiation therapy and had a salvage total laryngectomy performed. Sixteen patients (41%) had had some type of flap reconstruction performed-two involving the pectoralis major myocutaneous flap, five involving the radial forearm free flap, eight involving the anterior lateral thigh free flap, and one other that wasn’t specified. Seventeen patients (44%) had had a previous tracheoesophageal puncture.

You Might Also Like

  • Transnasal Esophagoscopy: A Viable Alternative to Conventional Procedures
  • In-Office Transnasal Esophagoscopy Appears Safe, Cost-Effective
  • Tracheoesophageal Voice Restoration Techniques Evaluated
  • Avoiding the Operating Room: The Advantages of Office-Based Laryngology and Esophagology
Explore This Issue
November 2009

Special care must be taken with patients who have had reconstruction performed, Dr. Hessel said. [For] any patient who has a free flap reconstruction, it is important that the patients being considered for TNE/TEP have some sort of imaging to confirm that the neopharynx and cervical esophagus are indeed lined up behind the trachea, she said. The extensive nature of a laryngopharyngectomy with flap may cause the anatomy to shift and the cervical esophagus may not be directly behind the tracheal stoma. At MDACC, we typically get a modified barium swallow in these patients to evaluate the anatomy before the TEP procedure.

The patients had the understandability of their speech analyzed. They were categorized as understandable all the time, understandable most of the time, usually understandable but with face-to-face contact necessary, difficult to understand, or never understandable.

In 38 of the 39 patients (97%) the puncture was performed successfully. There was some kind of technical difficulty in seven of the patients, with scar formation in four, and one instance each of nasopoharyngeal stenosis, a tight esophageal inlet, a tortuous pharyngoesophageal segment, and difficulty defining the puncture tract. But there were no complications, either major or minor, associated with the procedure.

The time until prosthesis placement was an average of 4.3 days. The type of reconstruction that had been used for pharyngeal closure had no statistical effect on outcome.

The 31 patients still using their prosthesis for speech at the time of their last clinical visit performed well. Twenty of these patients (61%) had speech that was rated as understandable all the time. Eight patients (25%) had speech rated as understandable most of the time, and three had speech rated as usually understandable or worse.

The success with voice results in secondary tracheoesophageal puncture patients in the study dovetailed with findings in other studies. A 2006 study (Cheng et al. Ear Nose Throat 2006; 85:262) reported that successful voice restoration in secondary TEP patients ranged from 56% to 94%.

Value of In-Office Procedures

Dr. Hessel said that the in-office option might be a valuable one. Transnasal tracheoesophageal fistula formation is a very viable procedure that, in the right patients, can be realistically done in any ENT office, she said. It is a billable procedure that allows the patient to forgo another anesthetic and to re-establish speech without significant problems.

Pages: 1 2 3 | Single Page

Filed Under: Head and Neck, Laryngology, Rhinology Tagged With: laryngectomy, patient satisfaction, research, speech pathology, TEPIssue: November 2009

You Might Also Like:

  • Transnasal Esophagoscopy: A Viable Alternative to Conventional Procedures
  • In-Office Transnasal Esophagoscopy Appears Safe, Cost-Effective
  • Tracheoesophageal Voice Restoration Techniques Evaluated
  • Avoiding the Operating Room: The Advantages of Office-Based Laryngology and Esophagology

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

The Triological SocietyENTtoday is a publication of The Triological Society.

Polls

Would you choose a concierge physician as your PCP?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...
  • Polls Archive

Top Articles for Residents

  • Applications Open for Resident Members of ENTtoday Edit Board
  • How To Provide Helpful Feedback To Residents
  • Call for Resident Bowl Questions
  • New Standardized Otolaryngology Curriculum Launching July 1 Should Be Valuable Resource For Physicians Around The World
  • Do Training Programs Give Otolaryngology Residents the Necessary Tools to Do Productive Research?
  • Popular this Week
  • Most Popular
  • Most Recent
    • A Journey Through Pay Inequity: A Physician’s Firsthand Account

    • The Dramatic Rise in Tongue Tie and Lip Tie Treatment

    • Otolaryngologists Are Still Debating the Effectiveness of Tongue Tie Treatment

    • Is Middle Ear Pressure Affected by Continuous Positive Airway Pressure Use?

    • Rating Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Severity: How Do Two Common Instruments Compare?

    • The Dramatic Rise in Tongue Tie and Lip Tie Treatment

    • Rating Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Severity: How Do Two Common Instruments Compare?

    • Is Middle Ear Pressure Affected by Continuous Positive Airway Pressure Use?

    • Otolaryngologists Are Still Debating the Effectiveness of Tongue Tie Treatment

    • Complications for When Physicians Change a Maiden Name

    • Excitement Around Gene Therapy for Hearing Restoration
    • “Small” Acts of Kindness
    • How To: Endoscopic Total Maxillectomy Without Facial Skin Incision
    • Science Communities Must Speak Out When Policies Threaten Health and Safety
    • Observation Most Cost-Effective in Addressing AECRS in Absence of Bacterial Infection

Follow Us

  • Contact Us
  • About Us
  • Advertise
  • The Triological Society
  • The Laryngoscope
  • Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use
  • Cookies

Wiley

Copyright © 2025 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc. All rights reserved, including rights for text and data mining and training of artificial technologies or similar technologies. ISSN 1559-4939