• Home
  • Practice Focus
    • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
    • Head and Neck
    • Laryngology
    • Otology/Neurotology
    • Pediatric
    • Rhinology
    • Sleep Medicine
    • How I Do It
    • TRIO Best Practices
  • Business of Medicine
    • Health Policy
    • Legal Matters
    • Practice Management
    • Tech Talk
    • AI
  • Literature Reviews
    • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
    • Head and Neck
    • Laryngology
    • Otology/Neurotology
    • Pediatric
    • Rhinology
    • Sleep Medicine
  • Career
    • Medical Education
    • Professional Development
    • Resident Focus
  • ENT Perspectives
    • ENT Expressions
    • Everyday Ethics
    • From TRIO
    • The Great Debate
    • Letter From the Editor
    • Rx: Wellness
    • The Voice
    • Viewpoint
  • TRIO Resources
    • Triological Society
    • The Laryngoscope
    • Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology
    • TRIO Combined Sections Meetings
    • COSM
    • Related Otolaryngology Events
  • Search

Avoiding the Operating Room: The Advantages of Office-Based Laryngology and Esophagology

by John Austin • August 1, 2006

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
Print-Friendly Version

CHICAGO-Obviously, there are times when a trip to the operating room is the only option, but more and more physicians are finding that more and more screening, diagnostic, and minimally invasive procedures are best performed in the office setting. Reduced risks, better recovery times, and favorable reimbursement are just a few of the issues that often make many laryngology and esophagology procedures attractive candidates for an office-based approach, according to Albert Merati, MD, Chief of Laryngology, Associate Professor of Otolaryngology and Communication Sciences and Director of the Center for Communication and Swallowing Disorders at the Medical College of Wisconsin in Milwaukee.

You Might Also Like

  • Office-Based FNA Thyroid Nodule Biopsies a Viable Option
  • In-Office Laryngeal Procedures in Awake Patients a Viable, and Often Preferable, Option
  • Adding Office-Based Laryngeal Procedures to Your Practice Can Benefit Patients
  • Novel Method Overcomes Nasal Discomfort in Office-Based Laser Surgery
Explore This Issue
August 2006
Figure. Otolaryngologists-head and neck surgeons are finding many uses for office based laryngology and esophagology techniques. Here, a physician takes a brush biopsy using an endoscope.

click for large version
Figure. Otolaryngologists-head and neck surgeons are finding many uses for office based laryngology and esophagology techniques. Here, a physician takes a brush biopsy using an endoscope.

Dr. Merati served as moderator for a special panel discussion hosted by the American Broncho-Esophageal Association here at the Combined Otolaryngology Spring Meetings (COSM). The panelists discussed some of the key issues related to office-based techniques, including utility of the procedure, equipment needed, indications and contraindications, and the economic implications of various techniques.

Transnasal Flexible Laryngoscopy and Biopsy

Transnasal flexible laryngoscopy (TFL) is commonly used in the office setting to evaluate patients with vocal cord paralysis or vocal fold tumors, but it is also very effective for obtaining tissue for biopsy, said Jonathan Aviv, MD, Professor of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery and Medical Director of the Voice and Swallowing Center at Columbia University Medical Center in New York City.

The indications for unsedated transnasal flexible laryngoscopy and biopsy are really very broad. We use this as a substitute for intraoperative direct laryngoscopy and biopsy under general anesthesia, Dr. Aviv said. This is not a substitute for laryngeal phonomicrosurgery, be very clear on this. This is for those white lesions and red lesions that you see in the office, that you see at the tongue base and you see in the larynx. We usually follow these things, but why follow them when you can get a definitive tissue diagnosis right away?

Dr. Aviv said his goal is to perform the procedure without the need for any injections, using only a topical anesthesia, typically 2% plain xylocaine, dropped directly on the vocal folds.

Then the instrument we use is a either a disposable brush or disposable biopsy forcep with suction attached, and a flexible laryngoscope that has a working channel, he said. The advantage of the brush is you can biopsy a broad lesion. The disadvantage is you can’t get through the basement membrane and you can’t detect invasion, which you can do with a cup forcep.

Advantages for Patient and Physician

The ability to perform the procedure without the need for general anesthesia, however, is the overriding advantage of office-based laryngoscopy, Dr. Aviv said.

Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 | Single Page

Filed Under: Departments, Laryngology, Medical Education, Practice Focus, Practice Management Tagged With: COSM, injections, laser, office-based, outcomes, patient satisfaction, surgery, techniques, treatment, vocal cordIssue: August 2006

You Might Also Like:

  • Office-Based FNA Thyroid Nodule Biopsies a Viable Option
  • In-Office Laryngeal Procedures in Awake Patients a Viable, and Often Preferable, Option
  • Adding Office-Based Laryngeal Procedures to Your Practice Can Benefit Patients
  • Novel Method Overcomes Nasal Discomfort in Office-Based Laser Surgery

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

The Triological SocietyENTtoday is a publication of The Triological Society.

Polls

Have you invented or patented something that betters the field of otolaryngology?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...
  • Polls Archive

Top Articles for Residents

  • Applications Open for Resident Members of ENTtoday Edit Board
  • How To Provide Helpful Feedback To Residents
  • Call for Resident Bowl Questions
  • New Standardized Otolaryngology Curriculum Launching July 1 Should Be Valuable Resource For Physicians Around The World
  • Do Training Programs Give Otolaryngology Residents the Necessary Tools to Do Productive Research?
  • Popular this Week
  • Most Popular
  • Most Recent
    • The Dramatic Rise in Tongue Tie and Lip Tie Treatment

    • Otolaryngologists as Entrepreneurs: Transforming Patient Care And Practice

    • Otolaryngologists Are Still Debating the Effectiveness of Tongue Tie Treatment

    • Continued Discussion And Engagement Are Essential To How Otolaryngologists Are Championing DEI Initiatives In Medicine

    • Rating Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Severity: How Do Two Common Instruments Compare?

    • The Dramatic Rise in Tongue Tie and Lip Tie Treatment

    • Rating Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Severity: How Do Two Common Instruments Compare?

    • Is Middle Ear Pressure Affected by Continuous Positive Airway Pressure Use?

    • Otolaryngologists Are Still Debating the Effectiveness of Tongue Tie Treatment

    • Complications for When Physicians Change a Maiden Name

    • Leaky Pipes—Time to Focus on Our Foundations
    • You Are Among Friends: The Value Of Being In A Group
    • How To: Full Endoscopic Procedures of Total Parotidectomy
    • How To: Does Intralesional Steroid Injection Effectively Mitigate Vocal Fold Scarring in a Rabbit Model?
    • What Is the Optimal Anticoagulation in HGNS Surgery in Patients with High-Risk Cardiac Comorbidities?

Follow Us

  • Contact Us
  • About Us
  • Advertise
  • The Triological Society
  • The Laryngoscope
  • Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use
  • Cookies

Wiley

Copyright © 2025 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc. All rights reserved, including rights for text and data mining and training of artificial technologies or similar technologies. ISSN 1559-4939