• Home
  • Practice Focus
    • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
    • Head and Neck
    • Laryngology
    • Otology/Neurotology
    • Pediatric
    • Rhinology
    • Sleep Medicine
    • How I Do It
    • TRIO Best Practices
  • Business of Medicine
    • Health Policy
    • Legal Matters
    • Practice Management
    • Tech Talk
    • AI
  • Literature Reviews
    • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
    • Head and Neck
    • Laryngology
    • Otology/Neurotology
    • Pediatric
    • Rhinology
    • Sleep Medicine
  • Career
    • Medical Education
    • Professional Development
    • Resident Focus
  • ENT Perspectives
    • ENT Expressions
    • Everyday Ethics
    • From TRIO
    • The Great Debate
    • Letter From the Editor
    • Rx: Wellness
    • The Voice
    • Viewpoint
  • TRIO Resources
    • Triological Society
    • The Laryngoscope
    • Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology
    • TRIO Combined Sections Meetings
    • COSM
    • Related Otolaryngology Events
  • Search

Is There Help for the Eustachian Tube?

by Larry Lundy, MD • April 5, 2015

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
Print-Friendly Version

Do topical nasal decongestants really improve Eustachian tube function?

Background: Commonly accepted clinical practice includes using nasal decongestant spray to alleviate, or prevent, Eustachian tube dysfunction associated with airline flights. Also, spray nasal decongestants are frequently recommended for acute otitis media or serous otitis media, especially if the condition is associated with an upper respiratory tract infection.

You Might Also Like

  • Nasal Decongestants Improve Nasal Airflow, but Not Eustachian Tube Function
  • Eustachian Tube Scores Effective Diagnostic Tools for Chronic Obstructive Eustachian Tube Dysfunction
  • Can We Use the Status of One Ear to Predict Eustachian Tube Function of the Contralateral Ear?
  • Intranasal Corticosteroids Treatment Shown Ineffective for Chronic Eustachian Tube Dysfunction
Explore This Issue
April 2015

Study design: Prospective, non-randomized study.

Setting: Tertiary referral center in Germany.

Synopsis: Xylometazoline (very similar to oxymetazoline in the U.S.) was used as a nasal spray in patients with an intact tympanic membrane, with pre- and post-treatment (15 minutes) rhinomanometry and tube manometry measures. Patients with a perforated tympanic membrane were also assessed, with nasal spray delivery as well as direct application of the decongestant through the tympanic membrane perforation into the middle ear. None of the patients showed any significant improvement in opening of the Eustachian tube. The authors recognize that the 15-minute interval between applying the decongestant and measuring Eustachian tube function may not assess longer interval potential effectiveness.

Bottom line: Nasal decongestants as a single treatment modality certainly improve nasal airflow, but objective data supporting improved Eustachian tube function is lacking.

Reference: Ovari A, Buhr A, Warkentin M, Kundt G, Ehrt K, Pau HW. Can nasal decongestants improve Eustachian tube function? Otol Neurotol. 2015;36:65-69.

—Reviewed by Larry Lundy, MD

Filed Under: Literature Reviews, Otology/Neurotology Tagged With: decongestant, eustachian tube, nasalIssue: April 2015

You Might Also Like:

  • Nasal Decongestants Improve Nasal Airflow, but Not Eustachian Tube Function
  • Eustachian Tube Scores Effective Diagnostic Tools for Chronic Obstructive Eustachian Tube Dysfunction
  • Can We Use the Status of One Ear to Predict Eustachian Tube Function of the Contralateral Ear?
  • Intranasal Corticosteroids Treatment Shown Ineffective for Chronic Eustachian Tube Dysfunction

The Triological SocietyENTtoday is a publication of The Triological Society.

Polls

Would you choose a concierge physician as your PCP?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...
  • Polls Archive

Top Articles for Residents

  • Applications Open for Resident Members of ENTtoday Edit Board
  • How To Provide Helpful Feedback To Residents
  • Call for Resident Bowl Questions
  • New Standardized Otolaryngology Curriculum Launching July 1 Should Be Valuable Resource For Physicians Around The World
  • Do Training Programs Give Otolaryngology Residents the Necessary Tools to Do Productive Research?
  • Popular this Week
  • Most Popular
  • Most Recent
    • A Journey Through Pay Inequity: A Physician’s Firsthand Account

    • The Dramatic Rise in Tongue Tie and Lip Tie Treatment

    • Rating Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Severity: How Do Two Common Instruments Compare?

    • Otolaryngologists Are Still Debating the Effectiveness of Tongue Tie Treatment

    • Is Middle Ear Pressure Affected by Continuous Positive Airway Pressure Use?

    • The Dramatic Rise in Tongue Tie and Lip Tie Treatment

    • Rating Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Severity: How Do Two Common Instruments Compare?

    • Is Middle Ear Pressure Affected by Continuous Positive Airway Pressure Use?

    • Otolaryngologists Are Still Debating the Effectiveness of Tongue Tie Treatment

    • Complications for When Physicians Change a Maiden Name

    • Excitement Around Gene Therapy for Hearing Restoration
    • “Small” Acts of Kindness
    • How To: Endoscopic Total Maxillectomy Without Facial Skin Incision
    • Science Communities Must Speak Out When Policies Threaten Health and Safety
    • Observation Most Cost-Effective in Addressing AECRS in Absence of Bacterial Infection

Follow Us

  • Contact Us
  • About Us
  • Advertise
  • The Triological Society
  • The Laryngoscope
  • Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use
  • Cookies

Wiley

Copyright © 2025 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc. All rights reserved, including rights for text and data mining and training of artificial technologies or similar technologies. ISSN 1559-4939