• Home
  • Practice Focus
    • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
    • Head and Neck
    • Laryngology
    • Otology/Neurotology
    • Pediatric
    • Rhinology
    • Sleep Medicine
    • How I Do It
    • TRIO Best Practices
  • Business of Medicine
    • Health Policy
    • Legal Matters
    • Practice Management
    • Tech Talk
    • AI
  • Literature Reviews
    • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
    • Head and Neck
    • Laryngology
    • Otology/Neurotology
    • Pediatric
    • Rhinology
    • Sleep Medicine
  • Career
    • Medical Education
    • Professional Development
    • Resident Focus
  • ENT Perspectives
    • ENT Expressions
    • Everyday Ethics
    • From TRIO
    • The Great Debate
    • Letter From the Editor
    • Rx: Wellness
    • The Voice
    • Viewpoint
  • TRIO Resources
    • Triological Society
    • The Laryngoscope
    • Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology
    • TRIO Combined Sections Meetings
    • COSM
    • Related Otolaryngology Events
  • Search

KTP and CO2 Laser Fiber Stapedotomy Compared

by Sue Pondrom • March 1, 2010

  • Tweet
  • Email
Print-Friendly Version

What is the safety and efficacy of the OmniGuide handheld fiber for CO2 laser stapedotomy as compared to the handheld potassium titanyl phosphate (KTP) laser in patients undergoing stapedotomy for otosclerosis?

Background: While both argon and KTP lasers can potentially have thermal effects on deep inner ear structures, CO2 lasers have been considered safer. However, the CO2 delivery system has been associated with damage resulting from missing the target. The new OmniGuide handheld CO2 laser may replace the micromanipulator system.

You Might Also Like

  • Laser vs. Manual Penetration of Stapes Footplate
  • Novel Method Overcomes Nasal Discomfort in Office-Based Laser Surgery
  • In-Office KTP or PDL Treatment of VF Leukoplakia Effective for Disease Control
  • Carbon Dioxide Laser Scores Well on Patient Tolerance in the Office
Explore This Issue
March 2010

Study Design: Prospective, nonrandomized clinical study

Setting: Jean Causse Ear Clinic, Colombiers, France

Synopsis: Surgery for otosclerosis with stapes fixation was performed in 214 patients between January 2008 and January 2009. Patients were divided into two equal groups: KTP laser fiber and flexible CO2 laser fiber, with all procedures performed by the same surgeon. In the KTP laser group, the postoperative air-bone gap (ABG) was 4.3 dB compared to three dB in the CO2 group. Of the patients in the KTP group, 92 percent (76 cases) had a postoperative ABG of 10 dB or less, compared to 97 percent (89 cases) in the CO2 group. The postoperative ABG at 4 kHz was 4.9 dB in the KTP and 2.2 dB in the CO2 group. The authors suggest that further study should look at outcomes such as tinnitus or dizziness and quality of life. Additionally, future studies might look at six and eight kHz frequencies, and a larger, randomized trial was recommended, including longer follow-up to show possible sensorineural hearing loss.

Bottom Line: The clinical safety and efficacy of both KTP and CO2 laser for primary stapedotomy was reaffirmed, with the use of the new handheld CO2 laser shown to be associated with slightly better hearing results, especially when assessed at the four kHz frequency.

Citation: Vincent R, Grolman W, Oates J, et al. A nonrandomized comparison of potassium titanyl phosphate and CO2 laser fiber stapedotomy for primary otosclerosis with the otology-neurotology database. Laryngoscope. 2010;120(3):571-576.

Filed Under: Literature Reviews, Otology/Neurotology, Otology/Neurotology, Practice Focus Tagged With: otosclerosis, stapedotomyIssue: March 2010

You Might Also Like:

  • Laser vs. Manual Penetration of Stapes Footplate
  • Novel Method Overcomes Nasal Discomfort in Office-Based Laser Surgery
  • In-Office KTP or PDL Treatment of VF Leukoplakia Effective for Disease Control
  • Carbon Dioxide Laser Scores Well on Patient Tolerance in the Office

The Triological SocietyENTtoday is a publication of The Triological Society.

Polls

Have you invented or patented something that betters the field of otolaryngology?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...
  • Polls Archive

Top Articles for Residents

  • Applications Open for Resident Members of ENTtoday Edit Board
  • How To Provide Helpful Feedback To Residents
  • Call for Resident Bowl Questions
  • New Standardized Otolaryngology Curriculum Launching July 1 Should Be Valuable Resource For Physicians Around The World
  • Do Training Programs Give Otolaryngology Residents the Necessary Tools to Do Productive Research?
  • Popular this Week
  • Most Popular
  • Most Recent
    • The Dramatic Rise in Tongue Tie and Lip Tie Treatment

    • The Road Less Traveled—at Least by Otolaryngologists

    • The Best Site for Pediatric TT Placement: OR or Office?

    • Rating Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Severity: How Do Two Common Instruments Compare?

    • Otolaryngologists Are Still Debating the Effectiveness of Tongue Tie Treatment

    • The Dramatic Rise in Tongue Tie and Lip Tie Treatment

    • Rating Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Severity: How Do Two Common Instruments Compare?

    • Is Middle Ear Pressure Affected by Continuous Positive Airway Pressure Use?

    • Otolaryngologists Are Still Debating the Effectiveness of Tongue Tie Treatment

    • Complications for When Physicians Change a Maiden Name

    • Leaky Pipes—Time to Focus on Our Foundations
    • You Are Among Friends: The Value Of Being In A Group
    • How To: Full Endoscopic Procedures of Total Parotidectomy
    • How To: Does Intralesional Steroid Injection Effectively Mitigate Vocal Fold Scarring in a Rabbit Model?
    • What Is the Optimal Anticoagulation in HGNS Surgery in Patients with High-Risk Cardiac Comorbidities?

Follow Us

  • Contact Us
  • About Us
  • Advertise
  • The Triological Society
  • The Laryngoscope
  • Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use
  • Cookies

Wiley

Copyright © 2025 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc. All rights reserved, including rights for text and data mining and training of artificial technologies or similar technologies. ISSN 1559-4939