• Home
  • Practice Focus
    • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
    • Head and Neck
    • Laryngology
    • Otology/Neurotology
    • Pediatric
    • Rhinology
    • Sleep Medicine
    • How I Do It
    • TRIO Best Practices
  • Business of Medicine
    • Health Policy
    • Legal Matters
    • Practice Management
    • Tech Talk
    • AI
  • Literature Reviews
    • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
    • Head and Neck
    • Laryngology
    • Otology/Neurotology
    • Pediatric
    • Rhinology
    • Sleep Medicine
  • Career
    • Medical Education
    • Professional Development
    • Resident Focus
  • ENT Perspectives
    • ENT Expressions
    • Everyday Ethics
    • From TRIO
    • The Great Debate
    • Letter From the Editor
    • Rx: Wellness
    • The Voice
    • Viewpoint
  • TRIO Resources
    • Triological Society
    • The Laryngoscope
    • Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology
    • TRIO Combined Sections Meetings
    • COSM
    • Related Otolaryngology Events
  • Search

Literature Review: A Roundup of Important Recent Studies

September 1, 2013

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
Print-Friendly Version

Study design: Fresh cadaveric specimen dissection.

You Might Also Like

  • Literature Review: A Roundup of Important Recent Studies
  • Literature Review: A Roundup of Important Recent Studies
  • Literature Review: A Roundup of Important Recent Studies
  • Literature Review: A Roundup of Important Recent Studies
Explore This Issue
September 2013

Setting: Robotic Skills Laboratory, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus.

Synopsis: A fresh cadaveric specimen was dissected at the center’s Robotic Skills Laboratory. The laboratory environment was designed to be similar to that of a standard operating room. To facilitate the transnasal-transoral approach, researchers performed a posterior septectomy, enabling the transnasal introduction of an 8-mm 0° robotic camera. A transoral corridor provided access to the hard palate. For the transpalatal approach, a U-shaped mucosal incision was performed 5 mm medial to the maxillary dentition of the hard palate. Adjunctive transcervical ports allowed robotic instrument introduction directed cranially toward the clivus. A 1.5-cm incision allowed the manual introduction of the ports. Various combinations of camera corridors and EndoWrist instrument were reviewed. The transoral camera (30°) and instruments provided good control of the posterior and lateral nasopharynx; however, they did not provide adequate access over the roof of the nasopharynx or posterior choana. The transnasal camera (0°) and trans-

oral instruments provided excellent visualization, but instrumentation was cumbersome. Neither EEA nor TORS solved the problem of drilling the skull base.

Bottom line: In combined use, EEA and TORS provide excellent exposure of the posterior skull base, nasopharynx and infratemporal fossa.

Citation: Ozer E, Durmus K, Carrau RL, et al. Applications of transoral, transcervical, transnasal, and transpalatal corridors for robotic surgery of the skull base. Laryngoscope. 2013;123:2176-2179.

—Reviewed by Amy Eckner

Cartilaginous Tissue Regeneration with Bioengineered Trachea

Is a bioengineered trachea effective in the rapid regeneration of the trachea in pediatric patients?

Background: Many times, surgical treatment including tracheal or laryngotracheal reconstruction is required for tracheal or subglottic stenosis management to avoid suffocation or dyspnea. For tracheal reconstruction, Teramachi and Nakamura and colleagues developed a tracheal prosthesis with polypropylene mesh and rings as a frame and collagen sponge as a scaffold. Because the frame does not expand, however, only adult cases have benefited.

Study design: Prospective controlled trial in an animal model.

Setting: Fukushima Medical University, Fukushima City, Japan.

Synopsis: A bioengineered trachea composed of autologous chondrocytes was developed, and its effect on cartilaginous regeneration was evaluated by surgical implantation into tracheal defects in 12-week-old male Japanese white rabbits. A tracheal prosthesis without chondrocytes was implanted in a control group. At two weeks after implantation, cartilaginous tissue formation was not clearly observed in the bioengineered group with H&E staining, but Alcian blue staining revealed regenerated cartilaginous tissue at the defect; in the control group, no cartilaginous tissue was observed in the tracheal prosthesis or at the edge of the tracheal cartilage. At eight weeks, regenerated cartilaginous tissue was observed in the bioengineered trachea, and the tracheal cartilage defect had been repaired into a ring-shaped form as a whole; in the control group, no regenerated cartilaginous tissue was observed in the tracheal prosthesis. At 14 weeks, more regenerated cartilaginous tissue was apparent in the bioengineered trachea, and the defect repair was maintained in the ring-shaped form as a whole.

Pages: 1 2 3 4 | Single Page

Filed Under: Uncategorized Tagged With: dizziness, literature review, skull base surgery, T&A, tissue regenerationIssue: September 2013

You Might Also Like:

  • Literature Review: A Roundup of Important Recent Studies
  • Literature Review: A Roundup of Important Recent Studies
  • Literature Review: A Roundup of Important Recent Studies
  • Literature Review: A Roundup of Important Recent Studies

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

The Triological SocietyENTtoday is a publication of The Triological Society.

Polls

Have you invented or patented something that betters the field of otolaryngology?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...
  • Polls Archive

Top Articles for Residents

  • Applications Open for Resident Members of ENTtoday Edit Board
  • How To Provide Helpful Feedback To Residents
  • Call for Resident Bowl Questions
  • New Standardized Otolaryngology Curriculum Launching July 1 Should Be Valuable Resource For Physicians Around The World
  • Do Training Programs Give Otolaryngology Residents the Necessary Tools to Do Productive Research?
  • Popular this Week
  • Most Popular
  • Most Recent
    • Otolaryngologists as Entrepreneurs: Transforming Patient Care And Practice

    • The Dramatic Rise in Tongue Tie and Lip Tie Treatment

    • Physician Handwriting: A Potentially Powerful Healing Tool

    • Rating Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Severity: How Do Two Common Instruments Compare?

    • Continued Discussion And Engagement Are Essential To How Otolaryngologists Are Championing DEI Initiatives In Medicine

    • The Dramatic Rise in Tongue Tie and Lip Tie Treatment

    • Rating Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Severity: How Do Two Common Instruments Compare?

    • Is Middle Ear Pressure Affected by Continuous Positive Airway Pressure Use?

    • Otolaryngologists Are Still Debating the Effectiveness of Tongue Tie Treatment

    • Complications for When Physicians Change a Maiden Name

    • Physician Handwriting: A Potentially Powerful Healing Tool
    • Leaky Pipes—Time to Focus on Our Foundations
    • You Are Among Friends: The Value Of Being In A Group
    • How To: Full Endoscopic Procedures of Total Parotidectomy
    • How To: Does Intralesional Steroid Injection Effectively Mitigate Vocal Fold Scarring in a Rabbit Model?

Follow Us

  • Contact Us
  • About Us
  • Advertise
  • The Triological Society
  • The Laryngoscope
  • Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use
  • Cookies

Wiley

Copyright © 2025 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc. All rights reserved, including rights for text and data mining and training of artificial technologies or similar technologies. ISSN 1559-4939