• Home
  • Practice Focus
    • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
    • Head and Neck
    • Laryngology
    • Otology/Neurotology
    • Pediatric
    • Rhinology
    • Sleep Medicine
    • How I Do It
    • TRIO Best Practices
  • Business of Medicine
    • Health Policy
    • Legal Matters
    • Practice Management
    • Technology
    • AI
  • Literature Reviews
    • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
    • Head and Neck
    • Laryngology
    • Otology/Neurotology
    • Pediatric
    • Rhinology
    • Sleep Medicine
  • Career
    • Medical Education
    • Professional Development
    • Resident Focus
  • ENT Perspectives
    • ENT Expressions
    • Everyday Ethics
    • From TRIO
    • The Great Debate
    • Letter From the Editor
    • Rx: Wellness
    • The Voice
    • Viewpoint
    • SUO Corner
  • TRIO Resources
    • Triological Society
    • The Laryngoscope
    • Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology
    • TRIO Combined Sections Meetings
    • COSM
    • Related Otolaryngology Events
  • Home
  • Practice Focus
    • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
    • Head and Neck
    • Laryngology
    • Otology/Neurotology
    • Pediatric
    • Rhinology
    • Sleep Medicine
    • How I Do It
    • TRIO Best Practices
  • Business of Medicine
    • Health Policy
    • Legal Matters
    • Practice Management
    • Technology
    • AI
  • Literature Reviews
    • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
    • Head and Neck
    • Laryngology
    • Otology/Neurotology
    • Pediatric
    • Rhinology
    • Sleep Medicine
  • Career
    • Medical Education
    • Professional Development
    • Resident Focus
  • ENT Perspectives
    • ENT Expressions
    • Everyday Ethics
    • From TRIO
    • The Great Debate
    • Letter From the Editor
    • Rx: Wellness
    • The Voice
    • Viewpoint
    • SUO Corner
  • TRIO Resources
    • Triological Society
    • The Laryngoscope
    • Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology
    • TRIO Combined Sections Meetings
    • COSM
    • Related Otolaryngology Events
  • Search

CMT Does Not Improve CRS after Adequate Medical Therapy Fails

by John M. DelGaudio, MD • April 1, 2014

  • Tweet
  • Email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
Print-Friendly Version

Does continued medical therapy (CMT) benefit patients with medically refractory chronic rhinosinusitis (RCRS) prior to endoscopic sinus surgery (ESS)?

Background: Patients with RCRS have shown improvement in symptom scores and quality of life (QoL) scores after ESS. Studies differ on whether patients who fail adequate medical therapy have continued beneficial effects from CMT.

You Might Also Like

  • Medical Therapy vs. Surgery for CRS
  • Medical Management for CRS Improves QOL
  • ESS Provides Better QOL for CRS Patients with Comorbid Migraine
  • Sleep Dysfunction a Strong Indicator of ESS Election for CRS
Explore This Issue
April 2014

Study design: Prospective observational study.

Setting: University of Calgary, Alberta, Canada.

Synopsis: The study included 31 adult patients with a diagnosis of CRS (by American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery Rhinosinusitis Task Force guidelines) who failed medical therapy, defined as a three-month minimum course of topical intranasal steroids, had at least seven days of systemic steroids, were given a +/- two-week course of broad spectrum antibiotics, and subsequently elected to undergo ESS. Due to the long wait time for elective surgeries in the Canadian healthcare system, there was a mean of 7.1 months of CMT between the point at which medical therapy was deemed to have failed and ESS was performed. CMT consisted of antihistamines, leukotriene receptor antagonists, and prolonged macrolide therapy, along with saline irrigations (+/- steroids), steroid sprays, and systemic antibiotics and steroids as needed. At the end of the period of CMT, just prior to ESS, this patient group experienced a statistically significant decline in disease-specific QoL (as measured by the SNOT-22) and Lund-Kennedy scores, p = 0.006 and p = 0.002, respectively. There was also an increase of 3.6 lost work days and an increase in use of high-volume steroid irrigations, while the use of topical steroid sprays was reduced, specifically to provide stronger topical therapy. A shortcoming of the study was that this period of CMT was not standardized.

Bottom line: Although there is still debate on what constitutes maximal medical therapy prior to proceeding to ESS, this study indicates that QoL measures and endoscopic scores do not improve with continued medical therapy for RCRS after failure of adequate medical therapy.

Citation: Smith KA, Rudmik L. Impact of continued medical therapy in patients with refractory chronic sinusitis. Int Forum Allergy Rhinol. 2014;4:34-38.

Filed Under: Literature Reviews, Practice Focus, Rhinology, Rhinology Tagged With: chronic rhinosinusitis, endoscopic sinus surgery, ESSIssue: April 2014

You Might Also Like:

  • Medical Therapy vs. Surgery for CRS
  • Medical Management for CRS Improves QOL
  • ESS Provides Better QOL for CRS Patients with Comorbid Migraine
  • Sleep Dysfunction a Strong Indicator of ESS Election for CRS

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

The Triological SocietyENTtoday is a publication of The Triological Society.

Polls

More and more medical trainees are taking dedicated, prolonged gap years. Did you?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...
  • Polls Archive

Top Articles for Residents

  • Is the SLOR in Otolaryngology Residency Applications Contributing to Rural Disparities?
  • Applications Open for Resident Members of the ENTtoday Editorial Board
  • A Resident’s View of AI in Otolaryngology
  • Call for Resident Bowl Questions
  • Resident Pearls: Pediatric Otolaryngologists Share Tips for Safer, Smarter Tonsillectomies
  • Popular this Week
  • Most Popular
  • Most Recent
    • Office Laryngoscopy Is Not Aerosol Generating When Evaluated by Optical Particle Sizer
    • Some Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Resists PPI Treatment
    • Top 10 LARY and LIO Articles of 2024
    • Empty Nose Syndrome: Physiological, Psychological, or Perhaps a Little of Both?
    • Rating Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Severity: How Do Two Common Instruments Compare?
    • The Dramatic Rise in Tongue Tie and Lip Tie Treatment
    • Rating Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Severity: How Do Two Common Instruments Compare?
    • Is Middle Ear Pressure Affected by Continuous Positive Airway Pressure Use?
    • Otolaryngologists Are Still Debating the Effectiveness of Tongue Tie Treatment
    • Keeping Watch for Skin Cancers on the Head and Neck
    • Short-Term Efficacy of Biologics in Recalcitrant AFRS: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    • The Devaluation of Otolaryngology: An Evaluation of CMS’s Involvement in Physician Reimbursement
    • Embolized Middle Meningeal Artery as a Surgical Landmark in Infratemporal Fossa
    • Lord of the (Magnetic) Rings: Rigid Bronchoscopy for Aspirated Magnetic Foreign Bodies in Tertiary Bronchi
    • What Otolaryngologists Can Learn from Athletes

Follow Us

  • Contact Us
  • About Us
  • Advertise
  • The Triological Society
  • The Laryngoscope
  • Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use
  • Cookies

Wiley

Copyright © 2026 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc. All rights reserved, including rights for text and data mining and training of artificial technologies or similar technologies. ISSN 1559-4939