• Home
  • Practice Focus
    • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
    • Head and Neck
    • Laryngology
    • Otology/Neurotology
    • Pediatric
    • Rhinology
    • Sleep Medicine
    • How I Do It
    • TRIO Best Practices
  • Business of Medicine
    • Health Policy
    • Legal Matters
    • Practice Management
    • Tech Talk
    • AI
  • Literature Reviews
    • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
    • Head and Neck
    • Laryngology
    • Otology/Neurotology
    • Pediatric
    • Rhinology
    • Sleep Medicine
  • Career
    • Medical Education
    • Professional Development
    • Resident Focus
  • ENT Perspectives
    • ENT Expressions
    • Everyday Ethics
    • From TRIO
    • The Great Debate
    • Letter From the Editor
    • Rx: Wellness
    • The Voice
    • Viewpoint
  • TRIO Resources
    • Triological Society
    • The Laryngoscope
    • Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology
    • TRIO Combined Sections Meetings
    • COSM
    • Related Otolaryngology Events
  • Search

ESS Effective and Reduces Healthcare Costs

by James A. Stankiewicz, MD • July 1, 2014

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
Print-Friendly Version

Is sinus surgery successful in providing relief and reducing cost?

You Might Also Like

  • ESS Provides Better QOL for CRS Patients with Comorbid Migraine
  • Increasing RTP Levels Reduces Bleeding, Improves Surgical Field-of-View in ESS
  • Steroid-Releasing Implant after ESS Is Safe and Effective
  • Confirming CRS with CT Scan Prior to Treatment Is Cost Effective
Explore This Issue
July 2014

Background: Patients with chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS) have continuing and often worsening symptoms, causing increased healthcare utilization. We are increasingly looking at cost analysis as we justify the most effective treatments for our patients. This study compares the cost of CRS with endoscopic sinus surgery (ESS) treatment and post-surgery costs. Using a large data base of 9,105 patients, pre-operative and post-operative records were retrospectively reviewed using database analysis.

Study design: Retrospective administrative data analysis.

Setting: Head and Neck Institute Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio.

Synopsis: Records of patients who received endoscopic sinus surgery and who had at least 104 weeks of pre- and post-operative medical therapy were included. Patient care visits were reviewed pre- and post-operatively. The records showed that medical costs leading up to the surgery increased only to fall significantly post-operatively. Few complications in surgery patients were noted, with hemorrhage the most common. Healthcare was constant up to six months pre-operatively. At 26 weeks pre-operatively, a continuous increase in healthcare utilization occurred up to three weeks pre-operatively. At that point another significant increase in healthcare utilization occurred related to a decision for surgery and pre-operative management. Post-operatively, cost declined rapidly, reaching baseline at 13 weeks.

Bottom line: CRS-related healthcare needs were eight-fold greater than baseline. Patients with operable CRS are truly ill as seen by healthcare utilization. The marked drop in healthcare use post-operatively serves as verification of the decision for surgery, an important lessening of healthcare use, and enhanced overall quality of life to the patients. This occurred despite 6.2% of patients requiring revision surgeries.

Citation: Berringer MS, Holy CE. Endoscopic sinus surgery provides effective relief as observed by health care use pre- and postoperatively. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2014;150:893-900.

 

Filed Under: Literature Reviews, Practice Focus, Rhinology, Rhinology Tagged With: chronic rhinosinusitis, endoscopic sinus surgery, ESSIssue: July 2014

You Might Also Like:

  • ESS Provides Better QOL for CRS Patients with Comorbid Migraine
  • Increasing RTP Levels Reduces Bleeding, Improves Surgical Field-of-View in ESS
  • Steroid-Releasing Implant after ESS Is Safe and Effective
  • Confirming CRS with CT Scan Prior to Treatment Is Cost Effective

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

The Triological SocietyENTtoday is a publication of The Triological Society.

Polls

Would you choose a concierge physician as your PCP?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...
  • Polls Archive

Top Articles for Residents

  • Applications Open for Resident Members of ENTtoday Edit Board
  • How To Provide Helpful Feedback To Residents
  • Call for Resident Bowl Questions
  • New Standardized Otolaryngology Curriculum Launching July 1 Should Be Valuable Resource For Physicians Around The World
  • Do Training Programs Give Otolaryngology Residents the Necessary Tools to Do Productive Research?
  • Popular this Week
  • Most Popular
  • Most Recent
    • A Journey Through Pay Inequity: A Physician’s Firsthand Account

    • The Dramatic Rise in Tongue Tie and Lip Tie Treatment

    • Otolaryngologists Are Still Debating the Effectiveness of Tongue Tie Treatment

    • Is Middle Ear Pressure Affected by Continuous Positive Airway Pressure Use?

    • Rating Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Severity: How Do Two Common Instruments Compare?

    • The Dramatic Rise in Tongue Tie and Lip Tie Treatment

    • Rating Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Severity: How Do Two Common Instruments Compare?

    • Is Middle Ear Pressure Affected by Continuous Positive Airway Pressure Use?

    • Otolaryngologists Are Still Debating the Effectiveness of Tongue Tie Treatment

    • Complications for When Physicians Change a Maiden Name

    • Excitement Around Gene Therapy for Hearing Restoration
    • “Small” Acts of Kindness
    • How To: Endoscopic Total Maxillectomy Without Facial Skin Incision
    • Science Communities Must Speak Out When Policies Threaten Health and Safety
    • Observation Most Cost-Effective in Addressing AECRS in Absence of Bacterial Infection

Follow Us

  • Contact Us
  • About Us
  • Advertise
  • The Triological Society
  • The Laryngoscope
  • Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use
  • Cookies

Wiley

Copyright © 2025 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc. All rights reserved, including rights for text and data mining and training of artificial technologies or similar technologies. ISSN 1559-4939