• Home
  • Practice Focus
    • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
    • Head and Neck
    • Laryngology
    • Otology/Neurotology
    • Pediatric
    • Rhinology
    • Sleep Medicine
    • How I Do It
    • TRIO Best Practices
  • Business of Medicine
    • Health Policy
    • Legal Matters
    • Practice Management
    • Tech Talk
    • AI
  • Literature Reviews
    • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
    • Head and Neck
    • Laryngology
    • Otology/Neurotology
    • Pediatric
    • Rhinology
    • Sleep Medicine
  • Career
    • Medical Education
    • Professional Development
    • Resident Focus
  • ENT Perspectives
    • ENT Expressions
    • Everyday Ethics
    • From TRIO
    • The Great Debate
    • Letter From the Editor
    • Rx: Wellness
    • The Voice
    • Viewpoint
  • TRIO Resources
    • Triological Society
    • The Laryngoscope
    • Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology
    • TRIO Combined Sections Meetings
    • COSM
    • Related Otolaryngology Events
  • Search

Image-Guided CI Clinically Feasible

by Amy Eckner • August 1, 2014

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
Print-Friendly Version

How effective is minimally invasive image-guided surgery for cochlear implantation (CI) in a clinical setting?

Background: Surgical CI typically involves a mastoidectomy with a facial recess approach, after which the cochlea is entered either through the round window or a separate cochleostomy. To date, the vast majority of these surgeries are performed manually, without computer-guided systems. Capitalizing on image-guidance technology, this minimally invasive approach can provide the advantages of traditional CI and suprameatal approaches without the disadvantages.

You Might Also Like

  • The State of the Art of Image-Guided Surgery
  • How Image-Guided Surgery Can Benefit Otolaryngology
  • No Evidence of CI Damage During Monopolar Cautery
  • Ultrasound-Guided Needle Dye Injection by Surgeon Localizes Tumor
Explore This Issue
August 2014

Study design: Prospective cohort study.

Setting: Vanderbilt University, Nashville, Tenn.

Synopsis: Nine patients consented to the minimally invasive image-guided approach. Once a patient was prepped, three titanium self-tapping anchors were screwed into the skull. The segmented anatomy and drill trajectory from a pre-operative computerized tomography (CT) scan were mapped to the intra-operative CT scan. A specially designed drill press was set to a preplanned distance based on patient anatomy. A stab incision was made where the drill hit the skin, and bone was exposed. Drilling was done with twist drill bits at 50,000 rpm. After lateral drilling, a second intra-operative CT scan confirmed that drilling was on course. A smaller-bore bit was then used for drilling through the facial recess. After securing the internal receiver, the electrode array was passed through the subperiosteal path, into the drilled tunnel, and into the cochlea under direct visualization provided by the tympanomeatal flap. Difficulties encountered included the inability to place the implant, CI electrode damage, tip fold-over, and facial nerve paresis. The most likely injury, despite copious irrigation with saline, was heat injury. Currently, the complication rate and intervention time are greater for image-guided than for traditional CI surgery.

Bottom line: Minimally invasive image-guided CI is clinically achievable, although further clinical study is needed to address technological difficulties encountered during drilling and insertion and to assess potential benefits, including decreased intervention time and decreased tissue dissection.

Citation: Labadie RF, Balachandran R, Noble JH, et al. Minimally invasive image-guided cochlear implantation surgery: first report of clinical implementation. Laryngoscope. 2014:124:1915-1922.

Filed Under: Literature Reviews, Otology/Neurotology, Otology/Neurotology, Practice Focus Tagged With: cochlear implantIssue: August 2014

You Might Also Like:

  • The State of the Art of Image-Guided Surgery
  • How Image-Guided Surgery Can Benefit Otolaryngology
  • No Evidence of CI Damage During Monopolar Cautery
  • Ultrasound-Guided Needle Dye Injection by Surgeon Localizes Tumor

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

The Triological SocietyENTtoday is a publication of The Triological Society.

Polls

Would you choose a concierge physician as your PCP?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...
  • Polls Archive

Top Articles for Residents

  • Applications Open for Resident Members of ENTtoday Edit Board
  • How To Provide Helpful Feedback To Residents
  • Call for Resident Bowl Questions
  • New Standardized Otolaryngology Curriculum Launching July 1 Should Be Valuable Resource For Physicians Around The World
  • Do Training Programs Give Otolaryngology Residents the Necessary Tools to Do Productive Research?
  • Popular this Week
  • Most Popular
  • Most Recent
    • A Journey Through Pay Inequity: A Physician’s Firsthand Account

    • The Dramatic Rise in Tongue Tie and Lip Tie Treatment

    • Otolaryngologists Are Still Debating the Effectiveness of Tongue Tie Treatment

    • Is Middle Ear Pressure Affected by Continuous Positive Airway Pressure Use?

    • Rating Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Severity: How Do Two Common Instruments Compare?

    • The Dramatic Rise in Tongue Tie and Lip Tie Treatment

    • Rating Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Severity: How Do Two Common Instruments Compare?

    • Is Middle Ear Pressure Affected by Continuous Positive Airway Pressure Use?

    • Otolaryngologists Are Still Debating the Effectiveness of Tongue Tie Treatment

    • Complications for When Physicians Change a Maiden Name

    • Excitement Around Gene Therapy for Hearing Restoration
    • “Small” Acts of Kindness
    • How To: Endoscopic Total Maxillectomy Without Facial Skin Incision
    • Science Communities Must Speak Out When Policies Threaten Health and Safety
    • Observation Most Cost-Effective in Addressing AECRS in Absence of Bacterial Infection

Follow Us

  • Contact Us
  • About Us
  • Advertise
  • The Triological Society
  • The Laryngoscope
  • Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use
  • Cookies

Wiley

Copyright © 2025 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc. All rights reserved, including rights for text and data mining and training of artificial technologies or similar technologies. ISSN 1559-4939