• Home
  • Practice Focus
    • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
    • Head and Neck
    • Laryngology
    • Otology/Neurotology
    • Pediatric
    • Rhinology
    • Sleep Medicine
    • How I Do It
    • TRIO Best Practices
  • Business of Medicine
    • Health Policy
    • Legal Matters
    • Practice Management
    • Tech Talk
    • AI
  • Literature Reviews
    • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
    • Head and Neck
    • Laryngology
    • Otology/Neurotology
    • Pediatric
    • Rhinology
    • Sleep Medicine
  • Career
    • Medical Education
    • Professional Development
    • Resident Focus
  • ENT Perspectives
    • ENT Expressions
    • Everyday Ethics
    • From TRIO
    • The Great Debate
    • Letter From the Editor
    • Rx: Wellness
    • The Voice
    • Viewpoint
  • TRIO Resources
    • Triological Society
    • The Laryngoscope
    • Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology
    • TRIO Combined Sections Meetings
    • COSM
    • Related Otolaryngology Events
  • Search

No Evidence of CI Damage During Monopolar Cautery

by George T. Hashisaki, MD • December 1, 2013

  • Tweet
  • Email
Print-Friendly Version

Does monopolar cautery use adversely affect an existing cochlear implant?

Background: Since the inception of cochlear implantation, monopolar cautery use has been contraindicated in patients with a cochlear implant in place. Risk of injury to the patient through abnormal spread of electrical current or risk of electrical damage to the cochlear implant device are the principal reasons. In the U.S., the three manufacturers of FDA-approved cochlear implant devices recommend against the concurrent use of monopolar electrocautery in patients with a cochlear implant.

You Might Also Like

  • No Adverse Events from Monopolar Electrosurgery Use in Patients with Cochlear Implants
  • Image-Guided CI Clinically Feasible
  • Innovation in Cochlear Impant Surgery
  • Ability to Heal from Hearing Damage Linked to Ear’s Circadian Rhythms
Explore This Issue
December 2013

Study design: Sixteen cochlear implant devices from the three manufacturers of FDA-approved cochlear implant devices were implanted into two unembalmed fresh cadavers. Monopolar electrocautery was applied at a location on the tongue and separately on the abdomen. The cochlear implant devices were monitored for changes in electrode impedance and internal electrical integrity before, during and after cautery. A thermocouple was used to measure perilymph temperature adjacent to the electrode array within the cochlea. Each cochlear implant device was returned to the manufacturer and underwent the respective evaluation protocol for an explanted cochlear implant device.

Synopsis: At settings of 10 W and 50 W, monopolar electrocautery was performed for periods of one, five, 10 and 30 minutes at locations on the tongue and the abdominal skin and subcutaneous soft tissue. No temperature change was measured within the cochlea for four different cochlear implant devices. No changes in cochlear implant electrode impedance or device integrity were measured. Comprehensive device analysis by the manufacturers did not detect any evidence of damage.

Bottom line: The study did not find evidence of thermal change within the cochlea or damage to the cochlear implant devices during the period of monopolar electrocautery use. The explanted cochlear implants did not show evidence of damage. Because this was a cadaver study, the authors were not able to assess whether there was other evidence of altered spread of electrical current due to the presence of the cochlear implant and whether living tissue would respond differently than fresh, unembalmed cadaver tissue.

Citation: Jeyakumar A, Wilson M, Sorrel JE, et al. Monopolar cautery and adverse effect on cochlear implants. JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2013;139:694-697.

—Reviewed by George T. Hashisaki, MD

Filed Under: Literature Reviews, Otology/Neurotology, Otology/Neurotology, Practice Focus Tagged With: cochlear implant, monopolar cauteryIssue: December 2013

You Might Also Like:

  • No Adverse Events from Monopolar Electrosurgery Use in Patients with Cochlear Implants
  • Image-Guided CI Clinically Feasible
  • Innovation in Cochlear Impant Surgery
  • Ability to Heal from Hearing Damage Linked to Ear’s Circadian Rhythms

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

The Triological SocietyENTtoday is a publication of The Triological Society.

Polls

Have you invented or patented something that betters the field of otolaryngology?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...
  • Polls Archive

Top Articles for Residents

  • Applications Open for Resident Members of ENTtoday Edit Board
  • How To Provide Helpful Feedback To Residents
  • Call for Resident Bowl Questions
  • New Standardized Otolaryngology Curriculum Launching July 1 Should Be Valuable Resource For Physicians Around The World
  • Do Training Programs Give Otolaryngology Residents the Necessary Tools to Do Productive Research?
  • Popular this Week
  • Most Popular
  • Most Recent
    • The Dramatic Rise in Tongue Tie and Lip Tie Treatment

    • Otolaryngologists Are Still Debating the Effectiveness of Tongue Tie Treatment

    • The Best Site for Pediatric TT Placement: OR or Office?

    • Rating Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Severity: How Do Two Common Instruments Compare?

    • Keeping Watch for Skin Cancers on the Head and Neck

    • The Dramatic Rise in Tongue Tie and Lip Tie Treatment

    • Rating Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Severity: How Do Two Common Instruments Compare?

    • Is Middle Ear Pressure Affected by Continuous Positive Airway Pressure Use?

    • Otolaryngologists Are Still Debating the Effectiveness of Tongue Tie Treatment

    • Complications for When Physicians Change a Maiden Name

    • Leaky Pipes—Time to Focus on Our Foundations
    • You Are Among Friends: The Value Of Being In A Group
    • How To: Full Endoscopic Procedures of Total Parotidectomy
    • How To: Does Intralesional Steroid Injection Effectively Mitigate Vocal Fold Scarring in a Rabbit Model?
    • What Is the Optimal Anticoagulation in HGNS Surgery in Patients with High-Risk Cardiac Comorbidities?

Follow Us

  • Contact Us
  • About Us
  • Advertise
  • The Triological Society
  • The Laryngoscope
  • Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use
  • Cookies

Wiley

Copyright © 2025 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc. All rights reserved, including rights for text and data mining and training of artificial technologies or similar technologies. ISSN 1559-4939