• Home
  • Practice Focus
    • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
    • Head and Neck
    • Laryngology
    • Otology/Neurotology
    • Pediatric
    • Rhinology
    • Sleep Medicine
    • How I Do It
    • TRIO Best Practices
  • Business of Medicine
    • Health Policy
    • Legal Matters
    • Practice Management
    • Technology
    • AI
  • Literature Reviews
    • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
    • Head and Neck
    • Laryngology
    • Otology/Neurotology
    • Pediatric
    • Rhinology
    • Sleep Medicine
  • Career
    • Medical Education
    • Professional Development
    • Resident Focus
  • ENT Perspectives
    • ENT Expressions
    • Everyday Ethics
    • From TRIO
    • The Great Debate
    • Letter From the Editor
    • Rx: Wellness
    • The Voice
    • Viewpoint
    • SUO Corner
  • TRIO Resources
    • Triological Society
    • The Laryngoscope
    • Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology
    • TRIO Combined Sections Meetings
    • COSM
    • Related Otolaryngology Events
  • Search

Oral/Maxillofacial Surgery Most Common Class to Result in Facial Nerve Injury

by Amy Eckner • January 1, 2014

  • Tweet
  • Email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
Print-Friendly Version

What types of iatrogenic facial nerve injuries (IFNIs) are most likely to occur in which circumstances?

Background: Some of the myriad causes of facial paralysis are potentially preventable, and IFNI is an attractive target for scrutiny. Reported rates of IFNI vary not only by procedure involved but also among studies addressing the same operation.

You Might Also Like

  • How Common Is Iatrogenic Facial Nerve Injury?
  • Is Facial Nerve Integrity Monitoring of Value in Chronic Ear Surgery?
  • Nimodipine May Improve Vocal Fold or Facial Motion After Injury
  • Does the Use of Steroids Perioperatively in Parotid Surgery Affect Facial Nerve Outcomes?
Explore This Issue
January 2014

Study design: Retrospective chart review of all patients seen between 2002 and 2012.

Setting: Massachusetts Eye and Ear Infirmary, Boston.

Synopsis: A total of 1,810 patient records were reviewed; 102 patients were identified as having experienced IFNI. The majority of these patients had sustained segmental facial nerve injuries. The most common injury site was the facial nerve’s main trunk, followed by the upper division and the marginal mandibular branch; injuries were more common on the right side, and there were more than twice as many female patients with IFNI. The most common surgical procedure classes to result in IFNI were: 1) oral/maxillofacial surgery (40% of IFNI; included temporomandibular joint (TMJ) replacement operations and mandible fracture repair); 2) benign head and neck lesion resection (25% of IFNI; included parotidectomy and total hemifacial weakness); 3) otologic surgery (17% of IFNI; included mastoid surgery as a whole, specifically tympanomastoidectomy, cochlear implantation, mastoid obliteration, endolymphatic sac shunting, labyrinthectomy and glomus tumor resection), and 4) cosmetic surgery (11% of IFNI; included rhytidectomy). Limitations included the study’s retrospective nature and possible non-representation of patients with IFNI not referred to a facial nerve specialist, incomplete intraoperative data, and a possible selection bias.

Bottom line: Iatrogenic facial nerve injury occurs most commonly in TMJ replacement, mastoidectomy, and parotidectomy; surgeons must be intimately familiar with the facial nerve’s normal course and any anatomical variations to avoid injury.

Citation: Hohman MH, Bhama PK, Hadlock TA. Epidemiology of iatrogenic facial nerve injury: a decade of experience. Laryngoscope. 2014;124:260-265.

Filed Under: Facial Plastic/Reconstructive, Facial Plastic/Reconstructive, Literature Reviews, Practice Focus Issue: January 2014

You Might Also Like:

  • How Common Is Iatrogenic Facial Nerve Injury?
  • Is Facial Nerve Integrity Monitoring of Value in Chronic Ear Surgery?
  • Nimodipine May Improve Vocal Fold or Facial Motion After Injury
  • Does the Use of Steroids Perioperatively in Parotid Surgery Affect Facial Nerve Outcomes?

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

The Triological SocietyENTtoday is a publication of The Triological Society.

Polls

Have you ever participated in a professional group's advocacy or Hill Day event?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...
  • Polls Archive

Top Articles for Residents

  • Is the SLOR in Otolaryngology Residency Applications Contributing to Rural Disparities?
  • Applications Open for Resident Members of the ENTtoday Editorial Board: Deadline Extended
  • A Resident’s View of AI in Otolaryngology
  • Call for Resident Bowl Questions
  • Resident Pearls: Pediatric Otolaryngologists Share Tips for Safer, Smarter Tonsillectomies
  • Popular this Week
  • Most Popular
  • Most Recent
    • Taking Otolaryngology Call in the ED and Hospital: Duty or Burden?
    • Empty Nose Syndrome: Physiological, Psychological, or Perhaps a Little of Both?
    • The Dramatic Rise in Tongue Tie and Lip Tie Treatment
    • Some Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Resists PPI Treatment
    • Innovations in Otolaryngology: Two Paths to Progress
    • The Dramatic Rise in Tongue Tie and Lip Tie Treatment
    • Rating Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Severity: How Do Two Common Instruments Compare?
    • Is Middle Ear Pressure Affected by Continuous Positive Airway Pressure Use?
    • Otolaryngologists Are Still Debating the Effectiveness of Tongue Tie Treatment
    • Complications for When Physicians Change a Maiden Name
    • Society Debuts TRIO Leadership Academy
    • Innovations in Otolaryngology: Two Paths to Progress
    • How to Have Effective Presurgical Discussions
    • Advocacy: Finding Our Voice
    • A Royal Family Heritage: The Habsburg Jaw

Follow Us

  • Contact Us
  • About Us
  • Advertise
  • The Triological Society
  • The Laryngoscope
  • Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use
  • Cookies

Wiley

Copyright © 2026 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc. All rights reserved, including rights for text and data mining and training of artificial technologies or similar technologies. ISSN 1559-4939