• Home
  • Practice Focus
    • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
    • Head and Neck
    • Laryngology
    • Otology/Neurotology
    • Pediatric
    • Rhinology
    • Sleep Medicine
    • How I Do It
    • TRIO Best Practices
  • Business of Medicine
    • Health Policy
    • Legal Matters
    • Practice Management
    • Tech Talk
    • AI
  • Literature Reviews
    • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
    • Head and Neck
    • Laryngology
    • Otology/Neurotology
    • Pediatric
    • Rhinology
    • Sleep Medicine
  • Career
    • Medical Education
    • Professional Development
    • Resident Focus
  • ENT Perspectives
    • ENT Expressions
    • Everyday Ethics
    • From TRIO
    • The Great Debate
    • Letter From the Editor
    • Rx: Wellness
    • The Voice
    • Viewpoint
  • TRIO Resources
    • Triological Society
    • The Laryngoscope
    • Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology
    • TRIO Combined Sections Meetings
    • COSM
    • Related Otolaryngology Events
  • Search

How Common Is Iatrogenic Facial Nerve Injury?

by David Bronstein • May 8, 2014

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
Print-Friendly Version

Pinpointing the incidence of iatrogenic facial nerve injury is not a straightforward affair, according to Jack M. Kartush, MD, emeritus professor at the Michigan Ear Institute at Wayne State University in Detroit. That difficulty stems, in part, from the fact that surgeons are not inclined to publish on their rare iatrogenic complications, he noted, pointing out that a commonly cited 1988 American Journal of Otology paper by Arnold Schuring, MD, past chairman of the American Academy of Otolaryngology’s Professional Liability Committee, quoted an incidence of 1% but cited no references.

You Might Also Like

  • Oral/Maxillofacial Surgery Most Common Class to Result in Facial Nerve Injury
  • Is Facial Nerve Integrity Monitoring of Value in Chronic Ear Surgery?
  • Otologists Report Greater Widespread Use of Intra-Operative Facial Nerve Monitoring
  • Kartush Facial Nerve Monitoring Protocol
Explore This Issue
May 2014

Other articles estimate a higher incidence of injury, especially with revision surgery; however, “these studies were done at a time when facial nerve monitoring was rarely used for mastoid surgery,” Dr. Kartush said. Consequently, most otologists today estimate that the risk in experienced hands is closer to 0.1%. “How much of this perceived reduction relates to monitoring, versus other factors such as fellowship training, cannot be discerned,” he said.

But even at a “low” risk of one in 1,000 cases, when an iatrogenic facial palsy occurs, it is a devastating complication for both the patient and the surgeon, Dr. Kartush said. “Hence, the need for routine widespread facial nerve monitoring, albeit with practice guidelines in place to ensure competency and expertise.”


David Bronstein is a freelance medical writer based in New Jersey.

Filed Under: Departments, Online Exclusives, Otology/Neurotology, Practice Focus, Special Reports Tagged With: neurotologyIssue: May 2014

You Might Also Like:

  • Oral/Maxillofacial Surgery Most Common Class to Result in Facial Nerve Injury
  • Is Facial Nerve Integrity Monitoring of Value in Chronic Ear Surgery?
  • Otologists Report Greater Widespread Use of Intra-Operative Facial Nerve Monitoring
  • Kartush Facial Nerve Monitoring Protocol

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

The Triological SocietyENTtoday is a publication of The Triological Society.

Polls

Have you invented or patented something that betters the field of otolaryngology?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...
  • Polls Archive

Top Articles for Residents

  • Applications Open for Resident Members of ENTtoday Edit Board
  • How To Provide Helpful Feedback To Residents
  • Call for Resident Bowl Questions
  • New Standardized Otolaryngology Curriculum Launching July 1 Should Be Valuable Resource For Physicians Around The World
  • Do Training Programs Give Otolaryngology Residents the Necessary Tools to Do Productive Research?
  • Popular this Week
  • Most Popular
  • Most Recent
    • The Dramatic Rise in Tongue Tie and Lip Tie Treatment

    • Otolaryngologists as Entrepreneurs: Transforming Patient Care And Practice

    • Otolaryngologists Are Still Debating the Effectiveness of Tongue Tie Treatment

    • Continued Discussion And Engagement Are Essential To How Otolaryngologists Are Championing DEI Initiatives In Medicine

    • Rating Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Severity: How Do Two Common Instruments Compare?

    • The Dramatic Rise in Tongue Tie and Lip Tie Treatment

    • Rating Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Severity: How Do Two Common Instruments Compare?

    • Is Middle Ear Pressure Affected by Continuous Positive Airway Pressure Use?

    • Otolaryngologists Are Still Debating the Effectiveness of Tongue Tie Treatment

    • Complications for When Physicians Change a Maiden Name

    • Leaky Pipes—Time to Focus on Our Foundations
    • You Are Among Friends: The Value Of Being In A Group
    • How To: Full Endoscopic Procedures of Total Parotidectomy
    • How To: Does Intralesional Steroid Injection Effectively Mitigate Vocal Fold Scarring in a Rabbit Model?
    • What Is the Optimal Anticoagulation in HGNS Surgery in Patients with High-Risk Cardiac Comorbidities?

Follow Us

  • Contact Us
  • About Us
  • Advertise
  • The Triological Society
  • The Laryngoscope
  • Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use
  • Cookies

Wiley

Copyright © 2025 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc. All rights reserved, including rights for text and data mining and training of artificial technologies or similar technologies. ISSN 1559-4939