• Home
  • Practice Focus
    • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
    • Head and Neck
    • Laryngology
    • Otology/Neurotology
    • Pediatric
    • Rhinology
    • Sleep Medicine
    • How I Do It
    • TRIO Best Practices
  • Business of Medicine
    • Health Policy
    • Legal Matters
    • Practice Management
    • Technology
    • AI
  • Literature Reviews
    • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
    • Head and Neck
    • Laryngology
    • Otology/Neurotology
    • Pediatric
    • Rhinology
    • Sleep Medicine
  • Career
    • Medical Education
    • Professional Development
    • Resident Focus
  • ENT Perspectives
    • ENT Expressions
    • Everyday Ethics
    • From TRIO
    • The Great Debate
    • Letter From the Editor
    • Rx: Wellness
    • The Voice
    • Viewpoint
    • SUO Corner
  • TRIO Resources
    • Triological Society
    • The Laryngoscope
    • Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology
    • TRIO Combined Sections Meetings
    • COSM
    • Related Otolaryngology Events
  • Home
  • Practice Focus
    • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
    • Head and Neck
    • Laryngology
    • Otology/Neurotology
    • Pediatric
    • Rhinology
    • Sleep Medicine
    • How I Do It
    • TRIO Best Practices
  • Business of Medicine
    • Health Policy
    • Legal Matters
    • Practice Management
    • Technology
    • AI
  • Literature Reviews
    • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
    • Head and Neck
    • Laryngology
    • Otology/Neurotology
    • Pediatric
    • Rhinology
    • Sleep Medicine
  • Career
    • Medical Education
    • Professional Development
    • Resident Focus
  • ENT Perspectives
    • ENT Expressions
    • Everyday Ethics
    • From TRIO
    • The Great Debate
    • Letter From the Editor
    • Rx: Wellness
    • The Voice
    • Viewpoint
    • SUO Corner
  • TRIO Resources
    • Triological Society
    • The Laryngoscope
    • Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology
    • TRIO Combined Sections Meetings
    • COSM
    • Related Otolaryngology Events
  • Search

Mucosal Flap Preservation May Not Be Required for Successful Outcomes with eDCR

by Literature Review • January 7, 2020

  • Tweet
  • Email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
Print-Friendly Version

What are the long-term outcomes after powered endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy (eDCR) without preservation of mucosal flaps for the acquired naso-lacrimal duct obstruction management?

BOTTOM LINE: Outcomes of powered eDCR without the preservation of mucosal flaps compare favorably to previously reported results in the literature. These long-term results suggest that mucosal flap preservation is not required to achieve successful outcomes with eDCR.

You Might Also Like

  • Using Mucosal Preservation Techniques in Endonasal Dacryocystorhinostomy Improves Long-Term Success
  • Upper Lateral Cartilage Mucosal Flap Enables the Successful Closure of Larger Septal Perforations
  • Can Posterior Septal Nasal Floor Mucosal Flap During Skull Base Reconstruction Repair Cerebrospinal Fluid Leaks?
  • Is Post-­Operative Stenting Necessary in Endoscopic Dacryocystorhinostomy?
Explore This Issue
January 2020

BACKGROUND: DCR is generally well tolerated and successful in relieving epiphora for those with nasolacrimal duct obstruction (NLDO). The use of powered instrumentation combined with mucosal flap preservation has been shown to be highly successful. Several groups report performing this procedure without preservation of mucosal flaps, allowing the mucosa to heal by second intention, with good initial clinical outcomes.

STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective review of 80 patients (69 primary, 11 revision), totaling 103 procedures (87 primary, 16 revision), with epiphora secondary to acquired nasolacrimal duct obstruction who underwent eDCR without mucosal flap preservation from May 2003 to
April 2013.

SETTING: Department of Otolaryngology, the University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, Colorado.

SYNOPSIS: The majority (71) of patients suffered from primary idiopathic acquired NLDO. Five patients had prior surgery for paranasal sinus neoplasm, and four patients had prior radioactive iodine treatment as presumed etiologies for epiphora. At the most recent follow-up, 92 of 103 procedures had complete epiphora resolution, and 10 of 103 procedures achieved mild intermittent epiphora. Analysis by group revealed complete epiphora resolution in 93.1% of primary procedures and 68.8% of revision procedures. A left-sided DCR was performed in 30 patients, a right-sided DCR in 25 patients, and bilateral DCR in 24 patients; silicone lacrimal stents were used in all cases and left in place for an average of three months.

There were no major complications in this series. Minor complications included stent-related complaints in approximately 20% of patients. In the primary eDCR group, there were six revision procedures performed on five sides in five patients to ultimately achieve complete epiphora resolution. Limitations included the review’s retrospective nature, lack of a direct comparison group, and symptoms that are patient reported.

CITATION: Kingdom TT, Barham HP, Durairaj VD. Long-term outcomes after endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy without mucosal flap preservation. Laryngoscope. 2020;130:12-17. doi: 10.1002/lary.27989.

Filed Under: Literature Reviews, Rhinology Tagged With: clinical outcomes, eDCRIssue: January 2020

You Might Also Like:

  • Using Mucosal Preservation Techniques in Endonasal Dacryocystorhinostomy Improves Long-Term Success
  • Upper Lateral Cartilage Mucosal Flap Enables the Successful Closure of Larger Septal Perforations
  • Can Posterior Septal Nasal Floor Mucosal Flap During Skull Base Reconstruction Repair Cerebrospinal Fluid Leaks?
  • Is Post-­Operative Stenting Necessary in Endoscopic Dacryocystorhinostomy?

The Triological SocietyENTtoday is a publication of The Triological Society.

Polls

More and more medical trainees are taking dedicated, prolonged gap years. Did you?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...
  • Polls Archive

Top Articles for Residents

  • Is the SLOR in Otolaryngology Residency Applications Contributing to Rural Disparities?
  • Applications Open for Resident Members of the ENTtoday Editorial Board
  • A Resident’s View of AI in Otolaryngology
  • Call for Resident Bowl Questions
  • Resident Pearls: Pediatric Otolaryngologists Share Tips for Safer, Smarter Tonsillectomies
  • Popular this Week
  • Most Popular
  • Most Recent
    • Office Laryngoscopy Is Not Aerosol Generating When Evaluated by Optical Particle Sizer
    • Some Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Resists PPI Treatment
    • Top 10 LARY and LIO Articles of 2024
    • Empty Nose Syndrome: Physiological, Psychological, or Perhaps a Little of Both?
    • Rating Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Severity: How Do Two Common Instruments Compare?
    • The Dramatic Rise in Tongue Tie and Lip Tie Treatment
    • Rating Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Severity: How Do Two Common Instruments Compare?
    • Is Middle Ear Pressure Affected by Continuous Positive Airway Pressure Use?
    • Otolaryngologists Are Still Debating the Effectiveness of Tongue Tie Treatment
    • Keeping Watch for Skin Cancers on the Head and Neck
    • Short-Term Efficacy of Biologics in Recalcitrant AFRS: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    • The Devaluation of Otolaryngology: An Evaluation of CMS’s Involvement in Physician Reimbursement
    • Embolized Middle Meningeal Artery as a Surgical Landmark in Infratemporal Fossa
    • Lord of the (Magnetic) Rings: Rigid Bronchoscopy for Aspirated Magnetic Foreign Bodies in Tertiary Bronchi
    • What Otolaryngologists Can Learn from Athletes

Follow Us

  • Contact Us
  • About Us
  • Advertise
  • The Triological Society
  • The Laryngoscope
  • Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use
  • Cookies

Wiley

Copyright © 2026 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc. All rights reserved, including rights for text and data mining and training of artificial technologies or similar technologies. ISSN 1559-4939