• Home
  • Practice Focus
    • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
    • Head and Neck
    • Laryngology
    • Otology/Neurotology
    • Pediatric
    • Rhinology
    • Sleep Medicine
    • How I Do It
    • TRIO Best Practices
  • Business of Medicine
    • Health Policy
    • Legal Matters
    • Practice Management
    • Tech Talk
    • AI
  • Literature Reviews
    • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
    • Head and Neck
    • Laryngology
    • Otology/Neurotology
    • Pediatric
    • Rhinology
    • Sleep Medicine
  • Career
    • Medical Education
    • Professional Development
    • Resident Focus
  • ENT Perspectives
    • ENT Expressions
    • Everyday Ethics
    • From TRIO
    • The Great Debate
    • Letter From the Editor
    • Rx: Wellness
    • The Voice
    • Viewpoint
  • TRIO Resources
    • Triological Society
    • The Laryngoscope
    • Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology
    • TRIO Combined Sections Meetings
    • COSM
    • Related Otolaryngology Events
  • Search

Nasal Endoscopes May Cause Thermal Injury

by Sue Pondrom • February 7, 2011

  • Tweet
  • Email
Print-Friendly Version

What are the temperature variations of nasal endoscopes, and do older scopes reach higher temperatures?

You Might Also Like

  • Large Fiberoptic Endoscopes May Be More Durable than Small Endoscopes
  • Researchers Find Evidence of Esophageal-Nasal Reflex
  • History of Endoscopic Examination of the Nasal Cavity
  • Factors to Consider in Preventing Laryngeal Injury Following Intubation
Explore This Issue
February 2011

Background: Although advances in endoscopic technology have improved illumination and light transmission, there may be greater heat production that places patients at risk for thermal injury, especially when endoscopic equipment comes into direct contact with the tissue of otolaryngology patients. Additionally, older scopes may reach higher temperatures as a result of less efficient light transmission.

Study design: Observational study.

Setting: Department of Otolaryngology, SUNY Upstate Medical University; Syracuse VA Medical Center, Syracuse, New York.

Synopsis: Temperature measurements were taken along different parts of a rigid nasal endoscope, with the highest temperatures found at the tip. Measurements were taken at various times between zero and 30 minutes. The light source was then turned off, and another reading was taken 10 minutes after turn-off. Temperature measurements were also taken from the tip of the light cord without an endoscope attached. Additional temperature time trials were performed in multiple sets to assess new endoscopes, light cords and light boxes compared with used and old equipment. The authors found that endoscope temperatures with 175W and 300W light sources demonstrated temperature maximums less than 40 degrees C, but a significant and potentially dangerous maximum of up to 62.5 degrees C was seen with the 550W light source. The light cord without the scope attached recorded a temperature higher than 130 degrees C; with the 550W light source, the temperature was nearly 200 degrees C. None of the new, used or old nasal endoscopes reached temperatures likely to cause significant thermal injury. Only the light box age statistically affected the final temperature. A limitation of the study was that it was performed in vitro and not in vivo.

Bottom line: Nasal endoscopes have the potential to reach temperatures high enough to cause thermal injury, especially with a 550W light source. The differences between the temperatures of old and new equipment are not clinically significant.

Citation: Nelson JJ, Goyal P. Temperature variations of nasal endoscopes. Laryngoscope. 2011;121(2):273-278.

—Reviewed by Sue Pondrom

Filed Under: Clinical, Literature Reviews, Rhinology Tagged With: clinical, measurements, nasal endoscopes, temperature, thermal injuryIssue: February 2011

You Might Also Like:

  • Large Fiberoptic Endoscopes May Be More Durable than Small Endoscopes
  • Researchers Find Evidence of Esophageal-Nasal Reflex
  • History of Endoscopic Examination of the Nasal Cavity
  • Factors to Consider in Preventing Laryngeal Injury Following Intubation

The Triological SocietyENTtoday is a publication of The Triological Society.

Polls

Have you invented or patented something that betters the field of otolaryngology?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...
  • Polls Archive

Top Articles for Residents

  • Applications Open for Resident Members of ENTtoday Edit Board
  • How To Provide Helpful Feedback To Residents
  • Call for Resident Bowl Questions
  • New Standardized Otolaryngology Curriculum Launching July 1 Should Be Valuable Resource For Physicians Around The World
  • Do Training Programs Give Otolaryngology Residents the Necessary Tools to Do Productive Research?
  • Popular this Week
  • Most Popular
  • Most Recent
    • The Dramatic Rise in Tongue Tie and Lip Tie Treatment

    • The Road Less Traveled—at Least by Otolaryngologists

    • The Best Site for Pediatric TT Placement: OR or Office?

    • Rating Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Severity: How Do Two Common Instruments Compare?

    • Otolaryngologists Are Still Debating the Effectiveness of Tongue Tie Treatment

    • The Dramatic Rise in Tongue Tie and Lip Tie Treatment

    • Rating Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Severity: How Do Two Common Instruments Compare?

    • Is Middle Ear Pressure Affected by Continuous Positive Airway Pressure Use?

    • Otolaryngologists Are Still Debating the Effectiveness of Tongue Tie Treatment

    • Complications for When Physicians Change a Maiden Name

    • Leaky Pipes—Time to Focus on Our Foundations
    • You Are Among Friends: The Value Of Being In A Group
    • How To: Full Endoscopic Procedures of Total Parotidectomy
    • How To: Does Intralesional Steroid Injection Effectively Mitigate Vocal Fold Scarring in a Rabbit Model?
    • What Is the Optimal Anticoagulation in HGNS Surgery in Patients with High-Risk Cardiac Comorbidities?

Follow Us

  • Contact Us
  • About Us
  • Advertise
  • The Triological Society
  • The Laryngoscope
  • Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use
  • Cookies

Wiley

Copyright © 2025 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc. All rights reserved, including rights for text and data mining and training of artificial technologies or similar technologies. ISSN 1559-4939