• Home
  • Practice Focus
    • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
    • Head and Neck
    • Laryngology
    • Otology/Neurotology
    • Pediatric
    • Rhinology
    • Sleep Medicine
    • How I Do It
    • TRIO Best Practices
  • Business of Medicine
    • Health Policy
    • Legal Matters
    • Practice Management
    • Tech Talk
    • AI
  • Literature Reviews
    • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
    • Head and Neck
    • Laryngology
    • Otology/Neurotology
    • Pediatric
    • Rhinology
    • Sleep Medicine
  • Career
    • Medical Education
    • Professional Development
    • Resident Focus
  • ENT Perspectives
    • ENT Expressions
    • Everyday Ethics
    • From TRIO
    • The Great Debate
    • Letter From the Editor
    • Rx: Wellness
    • The Voice
    • Viewpoint
  • TRIO Resources
    • Triological Society
    • The Laryngoscope
    • Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology
    • TRIO Combined Sections Meetings
    • COSM
    • Related Otolaryngology Events
  • Search

New Quality Indicator: MOC promotes better care, ABOto director says

by Thomas R. Collins • October 8, 2010

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
Print-Friendly Version

BOSTON—With greater scrutiny of doctors and easier access to information about doctors’ education, the American Board of Otolaryngology’s Maintenance of Certification (MOC) program is more important than ever, said Robert Miller, MD, executive director of the American Board of Otolaryngology (ABOto).

You Might Also Like

  • How Will You Score? ABOto to launch MOC quality component
  • From the ABOto: MOC 2012 Update
  • New Oral Cavity Cancer Quality Measures Included in Maintenance of Certification (MOC) for Otolaryngologists
  • ABOto Strategic Planning Committee Focuses on Long-Term Goals
Explore This Issue
October 2010

“Health care quality is a major issue,” Dr. Miller, who’s also physician editor of ENT Today, said in a presentation at the 2010 Annual Meeting of the American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, held here Sept. 26-29. “I think more and more doctors are recognizing this. And the important point is, if we don’t do something to address physician quality, somebody else will. And I don’t think any of us would like that.”

Dr. Miller says MOC will improve quality of care.

Dr. Miller says MOC will improve quality of care

The MOC program, started 10 years ago, is overseen by the American Board of Medical Specialties (ABMS) and is a process for life-long learning and improving the quality of a doctor’s practice. It includes four parts: professional standing, continuing education and self-assessment, a cognitive exam, and performance in practice.

The performance in practice assessment, involving a review of a doctor in his working environment, is still being developed. But when it is complete, it will be the most important part of MOC, Dr. Miller said.

“Frankly, if we could develop a really accurate, well-done, easily done Part IV, probably Parts I, II, and III go away,” he said. “But we’re far from that. It’s clearly the most difficult to develop.”

MOC should not be confused with recertification, he stressed. “Some people get maintenance of certification and recertification confused,” Dr. Miller said. “Recertification is basically retaking of an exam every so often, usually every 10 years. Maintenance of certification does include such an exam, but it includes a lot of other activities that make it a more continuous process.”

The essence of MOC is to improve the care of patients, which is the ABOto’s mission, he said.

“The fiduciary responsibility of the board is to the public,” he said. “We don’t act in a vacuum of what effect this is going to have on our diplomates. But when push comes to shove, the board has a very easy decision-making process because we’re always concerned about what’s good for the patient.”

Diplomates certified in 2002 and later are exempt from MOC requirements, but Dr. Miller encouraged everyone to participate regardless.

Other Benefits

Aside from promoting quality care, there are other, practical reasons to do so, he said. Patients going to the ABOto website or calling the ABOto are told about doctors’ certification and whether they’ve participated in MOC. ABMS requires release of that information, he said.

Pages: 1 2 3 | Single Page

Filed Under: Career Development, Departments, Health Policy Tagged With: healthcare reform, licensing, maintenance of certification, policy, Quality, quality improvement, recertificationIssue: October 2010

You Might Also Like:

  • How Will You Score? ABOto to launch MOC quality component
  • From the ABOto: MOC 2012 Update
  • New Oral Cavity Cancer Quality Measures Included in Maintenance of Certification (MOC) for Otolaryngologists
  • ABOto Strategic Planning Committee Focuses on Long-Term Goals

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

The Triological SocietyENTtoday is a publication of The Triological Society.

Polls

Would you choose a concierge physician as your PCP?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...
  • Polls Archive

Top Articles for Residents

  • Applications Open for Resident Members of ENTtoday Edit Board
  • How To Provide Helpful Feedback To Residents
  • Call for Resident Bowl Questions
  • New Standardized Otolaryngology Curriculum Launching July 1 Should Be Valuable Resource For Physicians Around The World
  • Do Training Programs Give Otolaryngology Residents the Necessary Tools to Do Productive Research?
  • Popular this Week
  • Most Popular
  • Most Recent
    • A Journey Through Pay Inequity: A Physician’s Firsthand Account

    • The Dramatic Rise in Tongue Tie and Lip Tie Treatment

    • Otolaryngologists Are Still Debating the Effectiveness of Tongue Tie Treatment

    • Is Middle Ear Pressure Affected by Continuous Positive Airway Pressure Use?

    • Rating Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Severity: How Do Two Common Instruments Compare?

    • The Dramatic Rise in Tongue Tie and Lip Tie Treatment

    • Rating Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Severity: How Do Two Common Instruments Compare?

    • Is Middle Ear Pressure Affected by Continuous Positive Airway Pressure Use?

    • Otolaryngologists Are Still Debating the Effectiveness of Tongue Tie Treatment

    • Complications for When Physicians Change a Maiden Name

    • Excitement Around Gene Therapy for Hearing Restoration
    • “Small” Acts of Kindness
    • How To: Endoscopic Total Maxillectomy Without Facial Skin Incision
    • Science Communities Must Speak Out When Policies Threaten Health and Safety
    • Observation Most Cost-Effective in Addressing AECRS in Absence of Bacterial Infection

Follow Us

  • Contact Us
  • About Us
  • Advertise
  • The Triological Society
  • The Laryngoscope
  • Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use
  • Cookies

Wiley

Copyright © 2025 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc. All rights reserved, including rights for text and data mining and training of artificial technologies or similar technologies. ISSN 1559-4939