• Home
  • Practice Focus
    • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
    • Head and Neck
    • Laryngology
    • Otology/Neurotology
    • Pediatric
    • Rhinology
    • Sleep Medicine
    • How I Do It
    • TRIO Best Practices
  • Business of Medicine
    • Health Policy
    • Legal Matters
    • Practice Management
    • Tech Talk
    • AI
  • Literature Reviews
    • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
    • Head and Neck
    • Laryngology
    • Otology/Neurotology
    • Pediatric
    • Rhinology
    • Sleep Medicine
  • Career
    • Medical Education
    • Professional Development
    • Resident Focus
  • ENT Perspectives
    • ENT Expressions
    • Everyday Ethics
    • From TRIO
    • The Great Debate
    • Letter From the Editor
    • Rx: Wellness
    • The Voice
    • Viewpoint
  • TRIO Resources
    • Triological Society
    • The Laryngoscope
    • Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology
    • TRIO Combined Sections Meetings
    • COSM
    • Related Otolaryngology Events
  • Search

New Quality Indicator: MOC promotes better care, ABOto director says

by Thomas R. Collins • October 8, 2010

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
Print-Friendly Version

“I think you can see the more educated patients may wonder about a doctor that doesn’t participate in MOC,” he said.

You Might Also Like

  • How Will You Score? ABOto to launch MOC quality component
  • From the ABOto: MOC 2012 Update
  • New Oral Cavity Cancer Quality Measures Included in Maintenance of Certification (MOC) for Otolaryngologists
  • ABOto Strategic Planning Committee Focuses on Long-Term Goals
Explore This Issue
October 2010

Hospital privileges may eventually require MOC, he added. “I don’t know of any that currently require MOC but I think this is something coming down the line,” he said.

Also, state licensing boards are requiring doctors to do “something similar to MOC” to meet state licensing requirements, he said.

Mark Wax, MD, professor of otolaryngology-head and neck surgery at Oregon Health and Science University, who was part of the same session, said that doctors who are not grandfathered still need to take MOC seriously, even though that may not have been his view at first.

Letters info

Send us your letters to enttoday@wiley.com or by mail to John Wiley & Sons, attention: ENT Today, 111 River Street, Mail Stop 8-01, Hoboken, NJ 07030.

“I thought, ‘Great, I won’t ever have to do this, it won’t affect me,’” Dr. Wax said. “I think we’re all wrong in that. I think the states are going to mandate that we’re going to have to do something to keep our license through them.”

To underline his point on the importance of MOC, Dr. Miller showed a curve of physician quality as it exists today, with a thin tail on the left for “bad” doctors and a thin tail on the right for “excellent” doctors, and the crest of the curve at the “good” line in the middle.

“The purpose of MOC is to shift the curve to the right,” he said. “Most otolaryngologists practice good medicine on most patients most of the time. Why not all of the patients all of the time?”

Maintenance of Certification: Its Four Parts

Maintenance of Certification: Its Four Parts

Part I: Professional Standing

  • Must have certificate from the American Board of Otolaryngology
  • Must have an unrestricted medical license
  • Must maintain privileges at hospital/ambulatory surgery center

Part II: Continuing Education and Self-Assessment

  • Part of a lifelong learning program
  • 25 CME units per year
  • Completion of self-assessment program that is clinically oriented, is specialty-specific and is aided by online modules
  • It is a non-punitive assessment

Part III: Cognitive Examination

  • Secure, closed-book exam administered at testing centers around the country
  • Totally clinical, no basic science
  • 80 questions: 12 on fundamentals, and the other 68 on a selected practice area
  • Focuses on specific practice, with clinical fundamentals and one specialty module
  • Cannot be used to imply subcertification, except for neurotology and sleep medicine

Part IV: Performance in Practice (Still being developed)

  • Possibly the most important part of MOC but the most difficult to develop
  • Based on a quality improvement approach
  • Will look at doctor-patient interaction and outcomes
  • Has to be meaningful but minimally intrusive
  • Has resulted in reduced malpractice rates
  • ’Enhanced’ Part IV being developed that will meet Physician Quality Reporting Initiative requirement

Pages: 1 2 3 | Single Page

Filed Under: Career Development, Departments, Health Policy Tagged With: healthcare reform, licensing, maintenance of certification, policy, Quality, quality improvement, recertificationIssue: October 2010

You Might Also Like:

  • How Will You Score? ABOto to launch MOC quality component
  • From the ABOto: MOC 2012 Update
  • New Oral Cavity Cancer Quality Measures Included in Maintenance of Certification (MOC) for Otolaryngologists
  • ABOto Strategic Planning Committee Focuses on Long-Term Goals

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

The Triological SocietyENTtoday is a publication of The Triological Society.

Polls

Do you use AI-powered scribes for documentation?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...
  • Polls Archive

Top Articles for Residents

  • Applications Open for Resident Members of ENTtoday Edit Board
  • How To Provide Helpful Feedback To Residents
  • Call for Resident Bowl Questions
  • New Standardized Otolaryngology Curriculum Launching July 1 Should Be Valuable Resource For Physicians Around The World
  • Do Training Programs Give Otolaryngology Residents the Necessary Tools to Do Productive Research?
  • Popular this Week
  • Most Popular
  • Most Recent
    • How to: Positioning for Middle Cranial Fossa Repair of Superior Semicircular Canal Dehiscence

    • The Dramatic Rise in Tongue Tie and Lip Tie Treatment

    • Rating Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Severity: How Do Two Common Instruments Compare?

    • Otolaryngologists Are Still Debating the Effectiveness of Tongue Tie Treatment

    • Endoscopic Ear Surgery: Advancements and Adoption Challenges 

    • The Dramatic Rise in Tongue Tie and Lip Tie Treatment

    • Rating Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Severity: How Do Two Common Instruments Compare?

    • Is Middle Ear Pressure Affected by Continuous Positive Airway Pressure Use?

    • Otolaryngologists Are Still Debating the Effectiveness of Tongue Tie Treatment

    • Complications for When Physicians Change a Maiden Name

    • The Importance of Time Away
    • Endoscopic Ear Surgery: Advancements and Adoption Challenges 
    • Reflections from a Past President of the Triological Society
    • ENT Surgeons Explore the Benefits and Challenges of AI-Powered Scribes: Revolutionizing Documentation in Healthcare
    • How To: Open Expansion Laryngoplasty for Combined Glottic and Subglottic Stenosis

Follow Us

  • Contact Us
  • About Us
  • Advertise
  • The Triological Society
  • The Laryngoscope
  • Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use
  • Cookies

Wiley

Copyright © 2025 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc. All rights reserved, including rights for text and data mining and training of artificial technologies or similar technologies. ISSN 1559-4939