• Home
  • Practice Focus
    • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
    • Head and Neck
    • Laryngology
    • Otology/Neurotology
    • Pediatric
    • Rhinology
    • Sleep Medicine
    • How I Do It
    • TRIO Best Practices
  • Business of Medicine
    • Health Policy
    • Legal Matters
    • Practice Management
    • Tech Talk
    • AI
  • Literature Reviews
    • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
    • Head and Neck
    • Laryngology
    • Otology/Neurotology
    • Pediatric
    • Rhinology
    • Sleep Medicine
  • Career
    • Medical Education
    • Professional Development
    • Resident Focus
  • ENT Perspectives
    • ENT Expressions
    • Everyday Ethics
    • From TRIO
    • The Great Debate
    • Letter From the Editor
    • Rx: Wellness
    • The Voice
    • Viewpoint
  • TRIO Resources
    • Triological Society
    • The Laryngoscope
    • Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology
    • TRIO Combined Sections Meetings
    • COSM
    • Related Otolaryngology Events
  • Search

New study findings suggest that cochlear implantees have a dampened emotional experience with music

by Thomas R. Collins • April 11, 2024

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
Print-Friendly Version

People with bilateral cochlear implantation have diminished perception of musical attributes, which limits their emotional response when listening, according to new findings presented at the Triological Society Combined Sections Meeting. The findings add a new dimension to the understanding of how cochlear implants detract from the quality of a person’s experience relating to music, the researchers said.

You Might Also Like

  • Best Timing for Second Implant in Pediatric Bilateral Cochlear Implantation
  • Inconsistency in Findings that Intraoperative Electrocochleography Improves Hearing Preservation in Cochlear Implantation
  • New Cochlear Implant Improves Hearing in Subset of Patients
  • Choosing the Better- Or Worse-Hearing Ear for Cochlear Implantation
Explore This Issue
April 2024

“It’s been well documented that music perception and enjoyment are diminished in these individuals,” said Isaac Alter, AB, a second-year medical student at Columbia University in New York City who presented the findings. “Studies have shown that while rhythm is preserved, the detection of pitch, harmony, and timbre are all impaired after implantation. And some studies show that over 50% of implantees report decreased enjoyment after implantation.”

The emotional aspect, however, hasn’t been explored extensively, he noted. “Emotional responses to music may be dampened after implantation, and this hasn’t been previously studied in adult bilateral cochlear implant users.”

I think we would all be hard pressed to think about our enjoyment of music in the absence of an emotional response or with a diminished emotional response. —Isaac Alter, AB

The study included 25 bilateral cochlear implant users and 18 controls with normal hearing who were pulled from the Columbia University system and through community outreach. Researchers collected demographic and hearing history; those with cochlear implants had had hearing loss for an average of 39 years and had had cochlear implants for 13 years. Because of the prevalence of hearing loss later in life, researchers couldn’t put together an age-matched control group, and the average age of the cochlear implant group was 64 years, compared to 36 years for the control group.

The participants performed a listening task in which they rated the “valence” and “arousal” in music from a variety of genres. Valence is the emotional continuum from happy to sad, and arousal is the continuum from excited to calm—factors that feed into a listener’s emotional experience.

Researchers recorded the maximum and minimum valence and arousal that could be appreciated by each participant and used that to determine the range of valence and arousal. They found a significant difference in the arousal that could be appreciated (P = 0.0086)—those with implants had a lower ceiling in the arousal that they appreciated—but not in the valence. This also meant a significant differ-ence in the range of arousal that could be appreciated between the groups (P = 0.0025).

Then, using normative values that had been established by prior researchers using the same musical clips, researchers assessed how accurately the two cohorts perceived the valence and the arousal. They found no difference in the ability to correctly identify arousal, but cochlear implant users had a significantly higher error rate when it came to identifying the valence in the music clips (P < 0.001), Alter said.

“There were significant differences for the four stimuli at the extremes of valence and arousal—the highest and lowest valence and arousal all had significant differences between cohorts,” he said.

The researchers hypothesized that the reduction in the range of arousal appreciation for music could result from a lowered appreciation of dynamics or volume range when listening to music with a cochlear implant, Alter said, adding that the difference in valence detection could stem from an inability to distinguish subtle pitch changes, such as a half-step change that could be the difference between a major, or “happy-sounding,” key, and a minor, or “sad-sounding,” key.

“We found that arousal range and valence detection are substantially diminished among bilateral cochlear implant users,” Alter said. “I just want to drive home the clinical relevance of that. It’s sort of easy to get lost in the weeds of these terms. But I think we would all be hard pressed to think about our enjoyment of music in the absence of an emotional response or with a diminished emotional response.” 

Thomas R. Collins is a freelance medical writer based in Florida.

Filed Under: Otology/Neurotology, Practice Focus Tagged With: cochlear implantsIssue: April 2024

You Might Also Like:

  • Best Timing for Second Implant in Pediatric Bilateral Cochlear Implantation
  • Inconsistency in Findings that Intraoperative Electrocochleography Improves Hearing Preservation in Cochlear Implantation
  • New Cochlear Implant Improves Hearing in Subset of Patients
  • Choosing the Better- Or Worse-Hearing Ear for Cochlear Implantation

The Triological SocietyENTtoday is a publication of The Triological Society.

Polls

Would you choose a concierge physician as your PCP?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...
  • Polls Archive

Top Articles for Residents

  • Applications Open for Resident Members of ENTtoday Edit Board
  • How To Provide Helpful Feedback To Residents
  • Call for Resident Bowl Questions
  • New Standardized Otolaryngology Curriculum Launching July 1 Should Be Valuable Resource For Physicians Around The World
  • Do Training Programs Give Otolaryngology Residents the Necessary Tools to Do Productive Research?
  • Popular this Week
  • Most Popular
  • Most Recent
    • A Journey Through Pay Inequity: A Physician’s Firsthand Account

    • The Dramatic Rise in Tongue Tie and Lip Tie Treatment

    • Otolaryngologists Are Still Debating the Effectiveness of Tongue Tie Treatment

    • Is Middle Ear Pressure Affected by Continuous Positive Airway Pressure Use?

    • Rating Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Severity: How Do Two Common Instruments Compare?

    • The Dramatic Rise in Tongue Tie and Lip Tie Treatment

    • Rating Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Severity: How Do Two Common Instruments Compare?

    • Is Middle Ear Pressure Affected by Continuous Positive Airway Pressure Use?

    • Otolaryngologists Are Still Debating the Effectiveness of Tongue Tie Treatment

    • Complications for When Physicians Change a Maiden Name

    • Excitement Around Gene Therapy for Hearing Restoration
    • “Small” Acts of Kindness
    • How To: Endoscopic Total Maxillectomy Without Facial Skin Incision
    • Science Communities Must Speak Out When Policies Threaten Health and Safety
    • Observation Most Cost-Effective in Addressing AECRS in Absence of Bacterial Infection

Follow Us

  • Contact Us
  • About Us
  • Advertise
  • The Triological Society
  • The Laryngoscope
  • Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use
  • Cookies

Wiley

Copyright © 2025 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc. All rights reserved, including rights for text and data mining and training of artificial technologies or similar technologies. ISSN 1559-4939