• Home
  • Practice Focus
    • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
    • Head and Neck
    • Laryngology
    • Otology/Neurotology
    • Pediatric
    • Rhinology
    • Sleep Medicine
    • How I Do It
    • TRIO Best Practices
  • Business of Medicine
    • Health Policy
    • Legal Matters
    • Practice Management
    • Tech Talk
    • AI
  • Literature Reviews
    • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
    • Head and Neck
    • Laryngology
    • Otology/Neurotology
    • Pediatric
    • Rhinology
    • Sleep Medicine
  • Career
    • Medical Education
    • Professional Development
    • Resident Focus
  • ENT Perspectives
    • ENT Expressions
    • Everyday Ethics
    • From TRIO
    • The Great Debate
    • Letter From the Editor
    • Rx: Wellness
    • The Voice
    • Viewpoint
  • TRIO Resources
    • Triological Society
    • The Laryngoscope
    • Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology
    • TRIO Combined Sections Meetings
    • COSM
    • Related Otolaryngology Events
  • Search

New Treatment for Head and Neck Cancer Means Longer-Lasting Toxicity

by Margot J. Fromer • August 1, 2008

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
Print-Friendly Version

MASCC’s 2005 guidelines for limiting the effect of oral mucositis are the most recent. They include:

You Might Also Like

  • Targeted Therapy a Potential Treatment for Head and Neck Cancer
  • Targeted Therapies + Chemo Show Activity in Recurrent/Metastatic Head And Neck Cancer
  • Chemoradiation vs. Surgery: Which is Better for Head and Neck Cancer?
  • Acupuncture May Improve Pain and Xerostomia After Head and Neck Cancer Surgery
Explore This Issue
August 2008
  • Midline radiation blocks and three-dimensional RT to reduce mucosal injury.
  • Use of benzydamine to prevent radiation-induced mucositis with moderate-dose RT.
  • Oral cryotherapy for 30 minutes for patients receiving bolus 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) and bolus edatrexate.
  • Cryotherapy for patients receiving high-dose melphalan.

Mucositis Treatment

The only agent approved for prevention of oral mucositis is palifermin (Kepivance), a modified recombinant keratinocyte growth factor. It has a number of biologic activities that appear to protect the mucosal epithelium: inhibition of epithelial cell apoptosis and DNA damage; upregulation of detoxifying enzymes; downregulation of proinflammatory cytokines; and enhanced migration, proliferation, and differentiation of epithelial cells.

When given intravenously (40 mcg/kg) for three days prior to chemotherapy and three days following, it reduces the incidence, severity, and duration of oral mucositis and decreases febrile neutropenia and the need for opioid analgesia and tube feeding.

A report by Patrick Stiff, MD, in 2006 in the Journal of Clinical Oncology confirmed that palifermin has clinical benefit when used with stem cell transplant. Two hundred twelve patients received palifermin or placebo before and after total body irradiation (12 Gy), etoposide 60 mg/kg, and cyclophosphamide 100 mg/kg.

Patient self-assessment and physicians’ observations were similar. Those who received palifermin had significant improvements in ability to swallow, drink, and eat, and they needed fewer narcotics.

Another 2006 JCO report by Lee S. Rosen, MD, compared placebo and palifermin for three days before each of two cycles of 5-FU/leucovorin in patients with colorectal cancer. The incidence of grade 2 or higher mucositis was lower in palifermin patients than in the placebo group: 29% vs 61% in the first cycle, and 11% vs 47% in the second cycle. The drug was well tolerated and resulted in a statistically significant and clinically meaningful reduction in mucositis.

The only other effective treatment is low-level laser therapy, which can delay the rate of mucositis by as much as 60%, as well as progression of mild toxicity to a more severe form in patients who have undergone stem cell transplant. It significantly reduces pain.

Cetuximab

Perhaps the best news for head and neck cancer patients in recent years is addition of cetuximab to surgery, chemotherapy, and radiation. The FDA approved it as a radiation sensitizing agent and for treatment of recurrent metastatic disease.

Cetuximab in combination with RT has demonstrated enhanced tumor control without increased significant toxicity. Because of this success, researchers are evaluating its use as part of multimodality treatment in locally advanced disease.

Pages: 1 2 3 | Single Page

Filed Under: Departments, Head and Neck, Medical Education, Practice Focus Tagged With: cancer, head and neck, medication, patient safety, radiation, treatmentIssue: August 2008

You Might Also Like:

  • Targeted Therapy a Potential Treatment for Head and Neck Cancer
  • Targeted Therapies + Chemo Show Activity in Recurrent/Metastatic Head And Neck Cancer
  • Chemoradiation vs. Surgery: Which is Better for Head and Neck Cancer?
  • Acupuncture May Improve Pain and Xerostomia After Head and Neck Cancer Surgery

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

The Triological SocietyENTtoday is a publication of The Triological Society.

Polls

Would you choose a concierge physician as your PCP?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...
  • Polls Archive

Top Articles for Residents

  • Applications Open for Resident Members of ENTtoday Edit Board
  • How To Provide Helpful Feedback To Residents
  • Call for Resident Bowl Questions
  • New Standardized Otolaryngology Curriculum Launching July 1 Should Be Valuable Resource For Physicians Around The World
  • Do Training Programs Give Otolaryngology Residents the Necessary Tools to Do Productive Research?
  • Popular this Week
  • Most Popular
  • Most Recent
    • A Journey Through Pay Inequity: A Physician’s Firsthand Account

    • The Dramatic Rise in Tongue Tie and Lip Tie Treatment

    • Otolaryngologists Are Still Debating the Effectiveness of Tongue Tie Treatment

    • Is Middle Ear Pressure Affected by Continuous Positive Airway Pressure Use?

    • Rating Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Severity: How Do Two Common Instruments Compare?

    • The Dramatic Rise in Tongue Tie and Lip Tie Treatment

    • Rating Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Severity: How Do Two Common Instruments Compare?

    • Is Middle Ear Pressure Affected by Continuous Positive Airway Pressure Use?

    • Otolaryngologists Are Still Debating the Effectiveness of Tongue Tie Treatment

    • Complications for When Physicians Change a Maiden Name

    • Excitement Around Gene Therapy for Hearing Restoration
    • “Small” Acts of Kindness
    • How To: Endoscopic Total Maxillectomy Without Facial Skin Incision
    • Science Communities Must Speak Out When Policies Threaten Health and Safety
    • Observation Most Cost-Effective in Addressing AECRS in Absence of Bacterial Infection

Follow Us

  • Contact Us
  • About Us
  • Advertise
  • The Triological Society
  • The Laryngoscope
  • Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use
  • Cookies

Wiley

Copyright © 2025 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc. All rights reserved, including rights for text and data mining and training of artificial technologies or similar technologies. ISSN 1559-4939