• Home
  • Practice Focus
    • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
    • Head and Neck
    • Laryngology
    • Otology/Neurotology
    • Pediatric
    • Rhinology
    • Sleep Medicine
    • How I Do It
    • TRIO Best Practices
  • Business of Medicine
    • Health Policy
    • Legal Matters
    • Practice Management
    • Tech Talk
    • AI
  • Literature Reviews
    • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
    • Head and Neck
    • Laryngology
    • Otology/Neurotology
    • Pediatric
    • Rhinology
    • Sleep Medicine
  • Career
    • Medical Education
    • Professional Development
    • Resident Focus
  • ENT Perspectives
    • ENT Expressions
    • Everyday Ethics
    • From TRIO
    • The Great Debate
    • Letter From the Editor
    • Rx: Wellness
    • The Voice
    • Viewpoint
  • TRIO Resources
    • Triological Society
    • The Laryngoscope
    • Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology
    • TRIO Combined Sections Meetings
    • COSM
    • Related Otolaryngology Events
  • Search

NIH Support for Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery Research Grows, Diversifies: Part 1 of 2

by Maureen Hannley, PhD • September 1, 2007

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
Print-Friendly Version

Maureen Hannley, PhD, is currently Chief of the Research Division of the Department of Otolaryngology and Communication Sciences at Medical College of Wisconsin and Research Consultant for the Triological Society. She formerly served as the Chief Research Officer of the American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery Foundation and has held positions at the National Institutes of Health, Stanford University Medical School, and Arizona State University.

You Might Also Like

  • Institutional Support and Funding Opportunities for Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery Research: Part 2 of 2
  • Female Otolaryngologists Pursuing Research Careers Need More Support, Researchers Conclude
  • Study Findings Move Research Closer to Personalized Head and Neck Cancer Treatments
  • Triological Society and American College of Surgeons Grants Support Otolaryngology Careers
Explore This Issue
September 2007

Part 2 of this article will discuss institutional support of research in otolaryngology-head and neck surgery and funding opportunities for researchers.

An important success story has been quietly taking place at the National Institutes of Health over the last decade, which bodes well for patient care, for science, and for the specialty. The number of funded projects with an otolaryngologist as the principal investigator has more than doubled between 1998 (74) and 2007 (152), as shown in Figure 1. The single largest increase has been in the number of research project grants (R mechanisms), followed by career development grants (K mechanisms); other types of funding have remained relatively stable.

Figure 1. Growth of NIH Support for Otolaryngologists

click for large version
Figure 1. Growth of NIH Support for Otolaryngologists

Even as the number of R01s (research project grants) awarded to all physicians at NIH declined by 22% between 1998 and 2004, the number of R01s awarded to otolaryngologists in that same time period increased almost threefold. Furthermore, the growth of K grants is significant because it represents growing numbers of young investigators in the pipeline preparing themselves for careers as independent surgeon-scientists. At the institutional level, funding has increased from $36,818,272 to 37 departments in FY 1998 to $98,944,654 to 42 departments in FY 2005 (IMPAC database, www.nih.gov ); these figures include funding to all principal investigators with academic appointments in departments of otolaryngology, not limited to physicians. Funding is actually higher than that represented by these figures, as they reflect only academic departments of otolaryngology, not divisions, and do not include private institutions with active research programs such as Memorial Sloan-Kettering, House Ear Institute, Boys Town National Research Hospital, or Massachusetts Eye and Ear Infirmary; if the list were comprehensive, it would probably exceed $125 million.

Project Focus

The greatest numbers of projects (see Figure 2) are those investigating auditory structures, function, diseases, disorders, or treatments (34.9%). Of these, approximately 65% are using basic (bench) techniques to investigate otitis media, cholesteatoma, tinnitus, syndromic and nonsyndromic hearing impairment, and autoimmune, age-related, and viral-mediated inner ear disorders. The remaining 35% are clinical research projects, including long-term follow-up of cochlear implant patients, optimization strategies for implants, and several clinical trials. Research focused on vestibular or laryngeal functions make up another 18% of the grants.

Pages: 1 2 3 | Single Page

Filed Under: Everyday Ethics, Head and Neck, Health Policy, Medical Education Issue: September 2007

You Might Also Like:

  • Institutional Support and Funding Opportunities for Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery Research: Part 2 of 2
  • Female Otolaryngologists Pursuing Research Careers Need More Support, Researchers Conclude
  • Study Findings Move Research Closer to Personalized Head and Neck Cancer Treatments
  • Triological Society and American College of Surgeons Grants Support Otolaryngology Careers

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

The Triological SocietyENTtoday is a publication of The Triological Society.

Polls

Would you choose a concierge physician as your PCP?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...
  • Polls Archive

Top Articles for Residents

  • Applications Open for Resident Members of ENTtoday Edit Board
  • How To Provide Helpful Feedback To Residents
  • Call for Resident Bowl Questions
  • New Standardized Otolaryngology Curriculum Launching July 1 Should Be Valuable Resource For Physicians Around The World
  • Do Training Programs Give Otolaryngology Residents the Necessary Tools to Do Productive Research?
  • Popular this Week
  • Most Popular
  • Most Recent
    • A Journey Through Pay Inequity: A Physician’s Firsthand Account

    • The Dramatic Rise in Tongue Tie and Lip Tie Treatment

    • Otolaryngologists Are Still Debating the Effectiveness of Tongue Tie Treatment

    • Is Middle Ear Pressure Affected by Continuous Positive Airway Pressure Use?

    • Rating Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Severity: How Do Two Common Instruments Compare?

    • The Dramatic Rise in Tongue Tie and Lip Tie Treatment

    • Rating Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Severity: How Do Two Common Instruments Compare?

    • Is Middle Ear Pressure Affected by Continuous Positive Airway Pressure Use?

    • Otolaryngologists Are Still Debating the Effectiveness of Tongue Tie Treatment

    • Complications for When Physicians Change a Maiden Name

    • Excitement Around Gene Therapy for Hearing Restoration
    • “Small” Acts of Kindness
    • How To: Endoscopic Total Maxillectomy Without Facial Skin Incision
    • Science Communities Must Speak Out When Policies Threaten Health and Safety
    • Observation Most Cost-Effective in Addressing AECRS in Absence of Bacterial Infection

Follow Us

  • Contact Us
  • About Us
  • Advertise
  • The Triological Society
  • The Laryngoscope
  • Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use
  • Cookies

Wiley

Copyright © 2025 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc. All rights reserved, including rights for text and data mining and training of artificial technologies or similar technologies. ISSN 1559-4939