• Home
  • Practice Focus
    • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
    • Head and Neck
    • Laryngology
    • Otology/Neurotology
    • Pediatric
    • Rhinology
    • Sleep Medicine
    • How I Do It
    • TRIO Best Practices
  • Business of Medicine
    • Health Policy
    • Legal Matters
    • Practice Management
    • Tech Talk
    • AI
  • Literature Reviews
    • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
    • Head and Neck
    • Laryngology
    • Otology/Neurotology
    • Pediatric
    • Rhinology
    • Sleep Medicine
  • Career
    • Medical Education
    • Professional Development
    • Resident Focus
  • ENT Perspectives
    • ENT Expressions
    • Everyday Ethics
    • From TRIO
    • The Great Debate
    • Letter From the Editor
    • Rx: Wellness
    • The Voice
    • Viewpoint
  • TRIO Resources
    • Triological Society
    • The Laryngoscope
    • Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology
    • TRIO Combined Sections Meetings
    • COSM
    • Related Otolaryngology Events
  • Search

Nuances in Rhinoplasty: Pearls and Pitfalls

by Sue Pondrom • July 1, 2007

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
Print-Friendly Version

SAN DIEGO—“Accentuate the positive” was one of the pointers heard by the almost 200 otolaryngologists and surgeons who attended the Triological Society’s April 28 panel discussion on “Nuances in Rhinoplasty” at the Combined Otolaryngology Spring Meeting. Stephen S. Park, MD, of the University of Virginia, moderated the discussion that offered tips “that might impact how you do your next rhinoplasty.”

You Might Also Like

  • Rhinoplasty Experts on Trends in Revision Surgery, Avoiding Legal Pitfalls
  • Spare Roof Technique Can Improve Patient Quality of Life after Rhinoplasty
  • Functional Results Strongly Influence Postoperative Satisfaction in Patients Who Have Undergone Rhinoplasty
  • Keeping Rhinoplasty Complications to a Minimum
Explore This Issue
July 2007

Offering pearls and pitfalls were panelists Roger Crumley, MD, MBA, of the University of California, Irvine; Jonathan Sykes, MD, from the University of California, Davis; and Patrick Byrne, MD, of Johns Hopkins.

Figure. It is important to discuss symmetry and proportion with the patient before performing a rhinoplasty.

click for large version
Figure. It is important to discuss symmetry and proportion with the patient before performing a rhinoplasty.

Starting Out

Stephen S. Park, MD

Stephen S. Park, MD

“Doing conservative surgery on properly selected patients will yield high patient satisfaction, which will in turn yield referrals,” Dr. Crumley told the audience members. “And it is a necessity during your first two years in practice.”

He said surgeons should be very careful in selecting cases among the first 50 patients and “do the less complicated ones that are going to look good out on the street. You’ll get a reputation.”

Emphasizing the importance of preoperative counseling, Dr. Crumley said to stress the negative after the patient decides to go ahead with the surgery. “Tell patients that it will be worse than expected and they will regret doing surgery. It will hurt a little bit, there will be swelling, and there’s a one in six chance for revision.”

Then, post-surgery, “stress the positive,” he continued. In particular, make sure the office staff tells them they look great and most people “look much worse this soon after surgery.”

At the same time, he said to be honest about imperfect results, but not to point out minor imperfections that the patient hasn’t complained about. “Let your patient tell you what problems there are,” he said.

Offering a tip on eyelid ecchymosis, he gave credit to Allan Sherman, MD, from UC San Francisco, who used two eye pads, folded once, per side. The suggestion was to:

  • Compress medial aspect, infraorbital rim.
  • Wrap with Kerlix, send patient home for removal 4 to 6 hours later.
  • Recognize that the downside is that the patient is essentially blindfolded.
  • Provide intraoperative Decadron 10 mg IV.
  • In the latter part of the procedure, have an assistant apply immediate external pressure to osteotomy sites.

Commenting briefly on open (external) versus closed (endonasal) SRP, Dr. Crumley said to learn both, but use open early on. He recommended doing 80% of the first 50 with the open procedure and with all cases after the first 50, doing 80% as closed SRP.

Pages: 1 2 3 4 | Single Page

Filed Under: Everyday Ethics, Facial Plastic/Reconstructive, Medical Education Issue: July 2007

You Might Also Like:

  • Rhinoplasty Experts on Trends in Revision Surgery, Avoiding Legal Pitfalls
  • Spare Roof Technique Can Improve Patient Quality of Life after Rhinoplasty
  • Functional Results Strongly Influence Postoperative Satisfaction in Patients Who Have Undergone Rhinoplasty
  • Keeping Rhinoplasty Complications to a Minimum

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

The Triological SocietyENTtoday is a publication of The Triological Society.

Polls

Would you choose a concierge physician as your PCP?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...
  • Polls Archive

Top Articles for Residents

  • Applications Open for Resident Members of ENTtoday Edit Board
  • How To Provide Helpful Feedback To Residents
  • Call for Resident Bowl Questions
  • New Standardized Otolaryngology Curriculum Launching July 1 Should Be Valuable Resource For Physicians Around The World
  • Do Training Programs Give Otolaryngology Residents the Necessary Tools to Do Productive Research?
  • Popular this Week
  • Most Popular
  • Most Recent
    • A Journey Through Pay Inequity: A Physician’s Firsthand Account

    • The Dramatic Rise in Tongue Tie and Lip Tie Treatment

    • Otolaryngologists Are Still Debating the Effectiveness of Tongue Tie Treatment

    • Is Middle Ear Pressure Affected by Continuous Positive Airway Pressure Use?

    • Rating Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Severity: How Do Two Common Instruments Compare?

    • The Dramatic Rise in Tongue Tie and Lip Tie Treatment

    • Rating Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Severity: How Do Two Common Instruments Compare?

    • Is Middle Ear Pressure Affected by Continuous Positive Airway Pressure Use?

    • Otolaryngologists Are Still Debating the Effectiveness of Tongue Tie Treatment

    • Complications for When Physicians Change a Maiden Name

    • Excitement Around Gene Therapy for Hearing Restoration
    • “Small” Acts of Kindness
    • How To: Endoscopic Total Maxillectomy Without Facial Skin Incision
    • Science Communities Must Speak Out When Policies Threaten Health and Safety
    • Observation Most Cost-Effective in Addressing AECRS in Absence of Bacterial Infection

Follow Us

  • Contact Us
  • About Us
  • Advertise
  • The Triological Society
  • The Laryngoscope
  • Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use
  • Cookies

Wiley

Copyright © 2025 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc. All rights reserved, including rights for text and data mining and training of artificial technologies or similar technologies. ISSN 1559-4939