• Home
  • Practice Focus
    • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
    • Head and Neck
    • Laryngology
    • Otology/Neurotology
    • Pediatric
    • Rhinology
    • Sleep Medicine
    • How I Do It
    • TRIO Best Practices
  • Business of Medicine
    • Health Policy
    • Legal Matters
    • Practice Management
    • Technology
    • AI
    • History of Otolaryngology
  • Literature Reviews
    • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
    • Head and Neck
    • Laryngology
    • Otology/Neurotology
    • Pediatric
    • Rhinology
    • Sleep Medicine
  • Career
    • Medical Education
    • Professional Development
    • Resident Focus
  • ENT Perspectives
    • ENT Expressions
    • Everyday Ethics
    • From TRIO
    • The Great Debate
    • Letter From the Editor
    • Rx: Wellness
    • The Voice
    • Viewpoint
    • SUO Corner
  • TRIO Resources
    • Triological Society
    • The Laryngoscope
    • Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology
    • TRIO Combined Sections Meetings
    • COSM
    • Related Otolaryngology Events
  • Search

Nuances in Rhinoplasty: Pearls and Pitfalls

by Sue Pondrom • July 1, 2007

  • Tweet
  • Email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
Print-Friendly Version

The thin-skinned patient is more of a challenge, he said. “Again, it starts with counseling and education of the patient. They run the risk of having visible irregularities. Pay attention to the quality of cartilage. The challenge for me is people who want a lot of tip work. I ask if they can live with something more conservative.”

You Might Also Like

  • Rhinoplasty Experts on Trends in Revision Surgery, Avoiding Legal Pitfalls
  • Spare Roof Technique Can Improve Patient Quality of Life after Rhinoplasty
  • Functional Results Strongly Influence Postoperative Satisfaction in Patients Who Have Undergone Rhinoplasty
  • Keeping Rhinoplasty Complications to a Minimum
Explore This Issue
July 2007

If you can’t avoid patients with thin skin, Dr. Byrne said to at least avoid cartilage-splitting techniques; soften the edges of the cartilage and do very meticulous carving of grafts.

Over the Hump

Rounding up the presentations, Dr. Park said he wanted to discuss the most common, most simplistic kind of rhinoplasty—hump reduction.

“It’s not the cleft lip nose, it’s not the revision, and it’s not the ultra thin-skin nose,” he said. “It’s the type of rhinoplasty where maybe you do a septoplasty or polypectomy and the patient says ‘While you’re there, can you just remove my hump?’”

“I think the perception of most people is that it’s pretty straightforward,” Dr. Park said. “And while it usually is, we also see complications in these patients.”

He noted that some patients will come back three months later and say that all they wanted was a septoplasty and the surgeon urged them to shave the hump. “I hear that surprisingly often,” he said.

For hump removal, he said there are a series of questions he goes through. “You can’t leave the initial consultation for a hump reduction without addressing these questions,” he said.

First, what is the hump made of? There are different anatomic etiologies to humps. The question is important because the answer will dictate the approach used. A large cartilaginous hump reduction will necessitate an external route in order to reconstruct the middle vault. Prophylactic spreader grafts are often needed in order to preserve width on the frontal view.

Second, recognize that the dorsal strut of the septum may be twisted and require elaborate splinting maneuvers.

Third, not all humps need reduction. Where does the nose begin and does the nasion need augmentation in order to restore balance to the profile?

Similarly, the fourth task is assessing chin projection with respect to the size of the nose. A small chin will create the illusion of a large nose, and the ideal aesthetic proportion may require chin augmentation in conjunction with a hump reduction.

Pages: 1 2 3 4 | Single Page

Filed Under: Everyday Ethics, Facial Plastic/Reconstructive, Medical Education Issue: July 2007

You Might Also Like:

  • Rhinoplasty Experts on Trends in Revision Surgery, Avoiding Legal Pitfalls
  • Spare Roof Technique Can Improve Patient Quality of Life after Rhinoplasty
  • Functional Results Strongly Influence Postoperative Satisfaction in Patients Who Have Undergone Rhinoplasty
  • Keeping Rhinoplasty Complications to a Minimum

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

The Triological SocietyENTtoday is a publication of The Triological Society.

Polls

Where should ENT publications draw the line on authors' use of generative AI?

View Results

Loading ...
  • Polls Archive

Top Articles for Residents

  • Rhinology’s Persistent Gender Gap
  • The Example We Set: Thoughts on the End of Residency Training
  • Is the SLOR in Otolaryngology Residency Applications Contributing to Rural Disparities?
  • Applications Open for Resident Members of the ENTtoday Editorial Board: Deadline Extended
  • A Resident’s View of AI in Otolaryngology
  • Popular this Week
  • Most Popular
  • Most Recent
    • ENTs Urged to Look Beyond Refractory Sinus Disease for Underlying Immune Deficiency
    • The Dramatic Rise in Tongue Tie and Lip Tie Treatment
    • Empty Nose Syndrome: Physiological, Psychological, or Perhaps a Little of Both?
    • History of the Cochlear Implant
    • Rating Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Severity: How Do Two Common Instruments Compare?
    • The Dramatic Rise in Tongue Tie and Lip Tie Treatment
    • Rating Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Severity: How Do Two Common Instruments Compare?
    • Is Middle Ear Pressure Affected by Continuous Positive Airway Pressure Use?
    • Otolaryngologists Are Still Debating the Effectiveness of Tongue Tie Treatment
    • Complications for When Physicians Change a Maiden Name
    • ENTs Urged to Look Beyond Refractory Sinus Disease for Underlying Immune Deficiency
    • When a “Blocked Ear” Isn’t Obstructive ETD
    • What Does It Mean to Be Written by a Human?
    • Reevaluating the CMS 90-Day CPAP Adherence Requirement: Persistent Use Among Early Nonadherent Patients
    • Vocal Outcomes After COVR in Porcine Bilateral Vocal Fold Resection

Follow Us

  • Contact Us
  • About Us
  • Advertise
  • The Triological Society
  • The Laryngoscope
  • Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use
  • Cookies

Wiley

Copyright © 2026 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc. All rights reserved, including rights for text and data mining and training of artificial technologies or similar technologies. ISSN 1559-4939