• Home
  • Practice Focus
    • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
    • Head and Neck
    • Laryngology
    • Otology/Neurotology
    • Pediatric
    • Rhinology
    • Sleep Medicine
    • How I Do It
    • TRIO Best Practices
  • Business of Medicine
    • Health Policy
    • Legal Matters
    • Practice Management
    • Tech Talk
    • AI
  • Literature Reviews
    • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
    • Head and Neck
    • Laryngology
    • Otology/Neurotology
    • Pediatric
    • Rhinology
    • Sleep Medicine
  • Career
    • Medical Education
    • Professional Development
    • Resident Focus
  • ENT Perspectives
    • ENT Expressions
    • Everyday Ethics
    • From TRIO
    • The Great Debate
    • Letter From the Editor
    • Rx: Wellness
    • The Voice
    • Viewpoint
  • TRIO Resources
    • Triological Society
    • The Laryngoscope
    • Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology
    • TRIO Combined Sections Meetings
    • COSM
    • Related Otolaryngology Events
  • Search

In-Office KTP or PDL Treatment of VF Leukoplakia Effective for Disease Control

by Literature Reviews • July 11, 2017

  • Tweet
  • Email
Print-Friendly Version

Is serial in-office laser treatment for vocal fold (VF) leukoplakia effective for long-term disease control with minimal morbidity?

Bottom line
Serial outpatient potassium titanyl phosphate (KTP) or pulsed dye laser (PDL) treatment of VF leukoplakia is effective for disease control with minimal morbidity and preservation of voice quality.

You Might Also Like

  • Vocal Cord Leukoplakia Management Trends Include Advanced Surgical Techniques, Voice Preservation
  • Novel Method Overcomes Nasal Discomfort in Office-Based Laser Surgery
  • When Is Surgical Intervention Indicated for Vocal Fold Leukoplakia?
  • Serial Excision Does Not Reduce Vocal Fold Laryngeal Dysplasia Grade
Explore This Issue
July 2017

Background: Leukoplakia is a clinical diagnosis indicating the presence of keratin on the VF epithelial surface. This diagnosis portends a risk of malignant transformation, with the severity of dysplasia associated with an increased rate of malignant degeneration. The management of leukoplakia poses a clinical dilemma because leukoplakia carries with it a risk of malignant transformation regardless of dysplasia grade, and it often recurs after treatment. There is no consensus on treatment, with surgeons offering varying degrees and frequency of surveillance, differing thresholds for repeat biopsy, and options of repetitive ablative or excisional management. Recently, treatment with in-office laser has become a common strategy. Although there are studies demonstrating the efficacy of in-office laser treatment of VF leukoplakia, these works are often based on a small series that may not be specific to leukoplakia, do not employ serial treatment, have short-term follow-up, and do not use objective methods to quantify disease regression (See Figure 2).

Figure 2. Determination of % lesion regression. (A) Average lesion area (three measurements) = 1,831 pixels. (B) Average full VF area (three measurements) = 6,924 pixels. Percent VF covered by the lesion was determined by (A/B) × 100% = (1,831/6,924) × 100% = 26.4% of the VF covered by lesion. This % was then compared with the postoperative picture % to determine regression. Credit: Copyright 2017 The American Laryngological, Rhinological and Otological Society, Inc.

Figure 2. Determination of % lesion regression. (A) Average lesion area (three measurements) = 1,831 pixels. (B) Average full VF area (three measurements) = 6,924 pixels. Percent VF covered by the lesion was determined by (A/B) × 100% = (1,831/6,924) × 100% = 26.4% of the VF covered by lesion. This % was then compared with the postoperative picture % to determine regression.
Credit: Copyright 2017 The American Laryngological, Rhinological and Otological Society, Inc.

Study design: Retrospective review (2008–2015).

Setting: New York Eye and Ear Infirmary of Mount Sinai.

Synopsis: Forty-six patients with VF leukoplakia treated by in-office KTP or PDL were included. Median follow-up from final laser treatment was 19.6 months. Main outcomes included: 1) rate of disease control, 2) percentage of disease regression using ImageJ analysis. Secondary outcomes included vocal assessment using the Voice Handicap Index-10 (VHI-10). Patients underwent a median of two (range: 1–6) in-office laser treatments. Time between treatments was median 7.6 months. After final treatment, 19 patients (41.3%) had no disease; two patients (4.3%) progressed to invasive cancer; overall disease regression was median 77.1%; and VHI-10 score decreased by median 5. Thirty-one patients (67.4%) were responders (controlled with in-office treatment only); 13 patients (28.3%) who required operative intervention and two patients (4%) who underwent radiation were categorized as failures. Compared with responders, failures demonstrated significantly shorter duration between treatments (median 2.3 vs. 8.9 months) and significantly less regression (median 49.3% vs. 100%).

Citation: Koss SL, Baxter P, Panossian H, Woo P, Pitman MJ. Serial in-office laser treatment of vocal fold leukoplakia: Disease control and voice outcomes. Laryngoscope. 2017;127:1644–1651.

Pages: 1 2 | Multi-Page

Filed Under: Laryngology, Literature Reviews Tagged With: laser treatment, outcome, pulsed dye laser, treatment, VF leukoplakia, vocal fold leukoplakiaIssue: July 2017

You Might Also Like:

  • Vocal Cord Leukoplakia Management Trends Include Advanced Surgical Techniques, Voice Preservation
  • Novel Method Overcomes Nasal Discomfort in Office-Based Laser Surgery
  • When Is Surgical Intervention Indicated for Vocal Fold Leukoplakia?
  • Serial Excision Does Not Reduce Vocal Fold Laryngeal Dysplasia Grade

The Triological SocietyENTtoday is a publication of The Triological Society.

Polls

Have you invented or patented something that betters the field of otolaryngology?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...
  • Polls Archive

Top Articles for Residents

  • Applications Open for Resident Members of ENTtoday Edit Board
  • How To Provide Helpful Feedback To Residents
  • Call for Resident Bowl Questions
  • New Standardized Otolaryngology Curriculum Launching July 1 Should Be Valuable Resource For Physicians Around The World
  • Do Training Programs Give Otolaryngology Residents the Necessary Tools to Do Productive Research?
  • Popular this Week
  • Most Popular
  • Most Recent
    • The Dramatic Rise in Tongue Tie and Lip Tie Treatment

    • The Road Less Traveled—at Least by Otolaryngologists

    • The Best Site for Pediatric TT Placement: OR or Office?

    • Rating Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Severity: How Do Two Common Instruments Compare?

    • Otolaryngologists Are Still Debating the Effectiveness of Tongue Tie Treatment

    • The Dramatic Rise in Tongue Tie and Lip Tie Treatment

    • Rating Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Severity: How Do Two Common Instruments Compare?

    • Is Middle Ear Pressure Affected by Continuous Positive Airway Pressure Use?

    • Otolaryngologists Are Still Debating the Effectiveness of Tongue Tie Treatment

    • Complications for When Physicians Change a Maiden Name

    • Leaky Pipes—Time to Focus on Our Foundations
    • You Are Among Friends: The Value Of Being In A Group
    • How To: Full Endoscopic Procedures of Total Parotidectomy
    • How To: Does Intralesional Steroid Injection Effectively Mitigate Vocal Fold Scarring in a Rabbit Model?
    • What Is the Optimal Anticoagulation in HGNS Surgery in Patients with High-Risk Cardiac Comorbidities?

Follow Us

  • Contact Us
  • About Us
  • Advertise
  • The Triological Society
  • The Laryngoscope
  • Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use
  • Cookies

Wiley

Copyright © 2025 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc. All rights reserved, including rights for text and data mining and training of artificial technologies or similar technologies. ISSN 1559-4939