• Home
  • Practice Focus
    • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
    • Head and Neck
    • Laryngology
    • Otology/Neurotology
    • Pediatric
    • Rhinology
    • Sleep Medicine
    • How I Do It
    • TRIO Best Practices
  • Business of Medicine
    • Health Policy
    • Legal Matters
    • Practice Management
    • Tech Talk
    • AI
  • Literature Reviews
    • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
    • Head and Neck
    • Laryngology
    • Otology/Neurotology
    • Pediatric
    • Rhinology
    • Sleep Medicine
  • Career
    • Medical Education
    • Professional Development
    • Resident Focus
  • ENT Perspectives
    • ENT Expressions
    • Everyday Ethics
    • From TRIO
    • The Great Debate
    • Letter From the Editor
    • Rx: Wellness
    • The Voice
    • Viewpoint
  • TRIO Resources
    • Triological Society
    • The Laryngoscope
    • Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology
    • TRIO Combined Sections Meetings
    • COSM
    • Related Otolaryngology Events
  • Search

Optimal Usage of Intratympanic Drug Therapy for Sudden Hearing Loss Unclear

by David Bronstein • January 1, 2013

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
Print-Friendly Version

Interpreting the results of the study, Dr. Gurgel said. “Since IT drug therapy was noninferior to oral steroids, we are not doing a disservice to our patients if we offer it to them as an option, especially if they can’t tolerate the side effects of systemic steroids.”

You Might Also Like

  • IT Steroid Treatment, Oral Corticosteroid Therapy Similar for Sudden Sensorineural Hearing Loss
  • Intratympanic Drug Therapy Effective for Ménière’s Disease
  • Does Addition of Antiviral Medication to High-Dose Corticosteroid Therapy Improve Hearing Recovery Following ISSNHL?
  • Pills vs. Injections: Which Steroids Are Best for Sudden Hearing Loss?
Explore This Issue
January 2013

Combination Therapy

Side effects of systemic therapy are only one aspect of care that clinicians will need to discuss with patients who present with sudden hearing loss; choice of therapy also needs to be explored, Dr. Gurgel said. “I do offer IT steroid injections to these patients but, frankly, many patients opt not to have it because they feel somewhat uncomfortable having something injected into their ear,” he said. “On the other side of the spectrum, I have patients who are so devastated by their sudden hearing loss that they are willing to try anything.” For those patients, he noted, combination therapy with systemic and IT steroids is another viable option.

There is evidence to support combination therapy but, again, the data are equivocal. In one positive study, a combination of a high-dose prednisone taper with IT steroids yielded a partial or complete hearing recovery in 14 of 16 patients (Otol Neurotol 2008;29:453-460). But, in another study, there was no statistically significant difference in hearing recovery as a result of combination therapy vs. steroids alone (Laryngoscope. 2008;118:279-282).

Those divergent results should not obscure the fact that combination therapy has a definite role in the management of ISSNHL, Dr. Gurgel noted. David S. Haynes, MD, professor in the department of otolaryngology/The Otology Group of Vanderbilt in Nashville, Tenn., echoed that view. “Most clinicians would opt for the combination approach—it’s what I would ask for,” he said. The main driver of that decision, he noted, is the fact that “we don’t fully understand what causes sudden hearing loss. Is it inflammation? An electrolyte dysfunction of the cochlea? A blood flow phenomenon? With all of those multifactorial processes occurring, I’d want a combined approach to cover all potential [causes].”

Having said that, however, Dr. Haynes said that he generally tends to take a more conservative approach to managing patients with ISSNHL than some of his colleagues. As a result, for one important consideration—whether to use IT steroids as initial or salvage therapy (i.e., after a patient has not responded to oral steroids or another treatment)—he comes down on the side of salvage. “If a patient persists with a two-day history of sudden hearing loss, I probably would not inject him or her right away, especially as we see patients improve spontaneously or with systemic therapy,” he said. “So my first-line approach is usually to tell patients that a week of systemic steroids is worth a try before injecting the ear. If systemic therapy fails, then we would certainly consider IT salvage therapy. We want to put patients in the best position to recover their hearing.”

Pages: 1 2 3 4 | Single Page

Filed Under: Departments, Otology/Neurotology, Practice Focus, Special Reports Tagged With: hearing loss, intratympanic drug therapy, treatmentIssue: January 2013

You Might Also Like:

  • IT Steroid Treatment, Oral Corticosteroid Therapy Similar for Sudden Sensorineural Hearing Loss
  • Intratympanic Drug Therapy Effective for Ménière’s Disease
  • Does Addition of Antiviral Medication to High-Dose Corticosteroid Therapy Improve Hearing Recovery Following ISSNHL?
  • Pills vs. Injections: Which Steroids Are Best for Sudden Hearing Loss?

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

The Triological SocietyENTtoday is a publication of The Triological Society.

Polls

Would you choose a concierge physician as your PCP?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...
  • Polls Archive

Top Articles for Residents

  • Applications Open for Resident Members of ENTtoday Edit Board
  • How To Provide Helpful Feedback To Residents
  • Call for Resident Bowl Questions
  • New Standardized Otolaryngology Curriculum Launching July 1 Should Be Valuable Resource For Physicians Around The World
  • Do Training Programs Give Otolaryngology Residents the Necessary Tools to Do Productive Research?
  • Popular this Week
  • Most Popular
  • Most Recent
    • A Journey Through Pay Inequity: A Physician’s Firsthand Account

    • The Dramatic Rise in Tongue Tie and Lip Tie Treatment

    • Otolaryngologists Are Still Debating the Effectiveness of Tongue Tie Treatment

    • Is Middle Ear Pressure Affected by Continuous Positive Airway Pressure Use?

    • Rating Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Severity: How Do Two Common Instruments Compare?

    • The Dramatic Rise in Tongue Tie and Lip Tie Treatment

    • Rating Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Severity: How Do Two Common Instruments Compare?

    • Is Middle Ear Pressure Affected by Continuous Positive Airway Pressure Use?

    • Otolaryngologists Are Still Debating the Effectiveness of Tongue Tie Treatment

    • Complications for When Physicians Change a Maiden Name

    • Excitement Around Gene Therapy for Hearing Restoration
    • “Small” Acts of Kindness
    • How To: Endoscopic Total Maxillectomy Without Facial Skin Incision
    • Science Communities Must Speak Out When Policies Threaten Health and Safety
    • Observation Most Cost-Effective in Addressing AECRS in Absence of Bacterial Infection

Follow Us

  • Contact Us
  • About Us
  • Advertise
  • The Triological Society
  • The Laryngoscope
  • Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use
  • Cookies

Wiley

Copyright © 2025 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc. All rights reserved, including rights for text and data mining and training of artificial technologies or similar technologies. ISSN 1559-4939