• Home
  • Practice Focus
    • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
    • Head and Neck
    • Laryngology
    • Otology/Neurotology
    • Pediatric
    • Rhinology
    • Sleep Medicine
    • How I Do It
    • TRIO Best Practices
  • Business of Medicine
    • Health Policy
    • Legal Matters
    • Practice Management
    • Tech Talk
    • AI
  • Literature Reviews
    • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
    • Head and Neck
    • Laryngology
    • Otology/Neurotology
    • Pediatric
    • Rhinology
    • Sleep Medicine
  • Career
    • Medical Education
    • Professional Development
    • Resident Focus
  • ENT Perspectives
    • ENT Expressions
    • Everyday Ethics
    • From TRIO
    • The Great Debate
    • Letter From the Editor
    • Rx: Wellness
    • The Voice
    • Viewpoint
  • TRIO Resources
    • Triological Society
    • The Laryngoscope
    • Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology
    • TRIO Combined Sections Meetings
    • COSM
    • Related Otolaryngology Events
  • Search

Oral Cavity Cancer Prognosis Has Improved Over Time

by ENT Today • December 11, 2018

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
Print-Friendly Version

What are the temporal trends demographics, treatment, and prognosis of oral cavity cancer over a 40-year period?

Bottom Line
OCSCC prognosis has improved significantly from the early 1970s to recent years, associated with an increased use of adjuvant therapy and adjuvant chemoradiotherapy in late-stage oral cancer.

You Might Also Like

  • What Additional Treatment Is Indicated for Oral Cavity Cancer with Isolated Perineural Invasion?
  • How Does Depth of Invasion Influence the Decision to Do a Neck Dissection in Clinically N0 Oral Cavity Cancer?
  • HPV-Oropharyngeal Cancer Link May Affect Cancer Screening and Prognosis: The link offers potential for improved detection and prevention, but more research is needed
  • Managing Depth of Invasion in Oral Cavity Cancer
Explore This Issue
December 2018

Background: The general therapeutic approach to oral cavity squamous cell carcinoma (OCSCC) — surgery followed by adjuvant radiation in cases with high-risk pathologic features or high-stage disease — has not changed. One exception has been the adoption of adjuvant concomitant chemoradiotherapy for certain high-risk pathologic features, but the extent to which quality of life improvements have truly altered OCSCC prognosis nationally over time is not clear.

Study design: Retrospective database analysis of 16,030 adult patients diagnosed with oral cavity cancer and treated surgically between 1973 and 2014.

Setting: National Cancer Institute’s Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) 9 registry; data from the National Cancer Database (NCDB).

Synopsis: Patients were about equally likely to present with early- or late-stage disease. Fewer patients present with low-grade tumors, those with intermediate-grade tumors have increased, and those presenting with high-grade malignancies has stayed consistent. The proportion of patients presenting with a primary on the tongue has increased by half; the proportion presenting with a primary on the floor of the mouth has dropped to almost a third of its initial value. For early-stage disease patients, survival has incrementally improved in each decade since 1973. For late-stage disease patients, survival improved slightly up to 2000, with more dramatic improvements since then. Diagnosis from 2011–2014 had less than half the hazard rate of 1973–1980 diagnosis. Adjuvant radiotherapy use has decreased since 2000 for early-stage OCSCC, but increased for adjuvant chemoradiotherapy use for late-stage OCSCC. Although survival for early- and late-stage disease has improved, the difference in survival between the two has widened. Additionally, death associated with older age as well as higher tumor grade has increased in magnitude over time. Between 1981 and 1990, black race was significantly associated with diminished survival, but this association ceased in 2011. Limitations include uncontrolled variables due to lack of data at source and limited follow-up for patients diagnosed in recent years.

Citation: Cheraghlou S, Schettino A, Zogg CK, Judson BL. Changing prognosis of oral cancer: An analysis of survival and treatment between 1973 and 2014. Laryngoscope. Published online ahead of print September 7, 2018. doi: 10.1002/lary. 27315.

Filed Under: Head and Neck, Literature Reviews Tagged With: mortality rate, oral cavity cancerIssue: December 2018

You Might Also Like:

  • What Additional Treatment Is Indicated for Oral Cavity Cancer with Isolated Perineural Invasion?
  • How Does Depth of Invasion Influence the Decision to Do a Neck Dissection in Clinically N0 Oral Cavity Cancer?
  • HPV-Oropharyngeal Cancer Link May Affect Cancer Screening and Prognosis: The link offers potential for improved detection and prevention, but more research is needed
  • Managing Depth of Invasion in Oral Cavity Cancer

The Triological SocietyENTtoday is a publication of The Triological Society.

Polls

Would you choose a concierge physician as your PCP?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...
  • Polls Archive

Top Articles for Residents

  • Applications Open for Resident Members of ENTtoday Edit Board
  • How To Provide Helpful Feedback To Residents
  • Call for Resident Bowl Questions
  • New Standardized Otolaryngology Curriculum Launching July 1 Should Be Valuable Resource For Physicians Around The World
  • Do Training Programs Give Otolaryngology Residents the Necessary Tools to Do Productive Research?
  • Popular this Week
  • Most Popular
  • Most Recent
    • A Journey Through Pay Inequity: A Physician’s Firsthand Account

    • The Dramatic Rise in Tongue Tie and Lip Tie Treatment

    • Otolaryngologists Are Still Debating the Effectiveness of Tongue Tie Treatment

    • Is Middle Ear Pressure Affected by Continuous Positive Airway Pressure Use?

    • Rating Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Severity: How Do Two Common Instruments Compare?

    • The Dramatic Rise in Tongue Tie and Lip Tie Treatment

    • Rating Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Severity: How Do Two Common Instruments Compare?

    • Is Middle Ear Pressure Affected by Continuous Positive Airway Pressure Use?

    • Otolaryngologists Are Still Debating the Effectiveness of Tongue Tie Treatment

    • Complications for When Physicians Change a Maiden Name

    • Excitement Around Gene Therapy for Hearing Restoration
    • “Small” Acts of Kindness
    • How To: Endoscopic Total Maxillectomy Without Facial Skin Incision
    • Science Communities Must Speak Out When Policies Threaten Health and Safety
    • Observation Most Cost-Effective in Addressing AECRS in Absence of Bacterial Infection

Follow Us

  • Contact Us
  • About Us
  • Advertise
  • The Triological Society
  • The Laryngoscope
  • Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use
  • Cookies

Wiley

Copyright © 2025 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc. All rights reserved, including rights for text and data mining and training of artificial technologies or similar technologies. ISSN 1559-4939