• Home
  • Practice Focus
    • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
    • Head and Neck
    • Laryngology
    • Otology/Neurotology
    • Pediatric
    • Rhinology
    • Sleep Medicine
    • How I Do It
    • TRIO Best Practices
  • Business of Medicine
    • Health Policy
    • Legal Matters
    • Practice Management
    • Technology
    • AI
    • History of Otolaryngology
  • Literature Reviews
    • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
    • Head and Neck
    • Laryngology
    • Otology/Neurotology
    • Pediatric
    • Rhinology
    • Sleep Medicine
  • Career
    • Medical Education
    • Professional Development
    • Resident Focus
  • ENT Perspectives
    • ENT Expressions
    • Everyday Ethics
    • From TRIO
    • The Great Debate
    • Letter From the Editor
    • Rx: Wellness
    • The Voice
    • Viewpoint
    • SUO Corner
  • TRIO Resources
    • Triological Society
    • The Laryngoscope
    • Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology
    • TRIO Combined Sections Meetings
    • COSM
    • Related Otolaryngology Events
  • Search

Pain May Help ID Patients Who Would Benefit from Neck Dissection

November 15, 2018

  • Tweet
  • Email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
Print-Friendly Version

A new study from researchers at New York University in New York City found that oral cancer pain level at the primary site may help physicians identify which patients with occult metastases will benefit from neck dissection. 

You Might Also Like

  • Elective Neck Dissection Indicated in Patients Undergoing Salvage Laryngectomy
  • Elective Neck Dissection May Be Beneficial in Predicting Occult Metastasis
  • What Is the Role of Elective Neck Dissection in Mucoepidermoid Carcinoma?
  • When Is Prophylactic Neck Dissection in Papillary Thyroid Cancer Necessary?

The investigators, led by senior author Donna Albertson, MD, presented their results in a poster on September 13 at the International Association for the Study of Pain (IASP) World Congress on Pain in Boston. 

The researchers enrolled 72 patients undergoing curative surgery for oral cancer, with or without neck dissection, and asked them to rate their pain using the University of California San Francisco Oral Cancer Pain Questionnaire (PQ). The questionnaire asks patients to rate the intensity of their pain on a 0–100 point visual analogue scale in response to eight questions, which differentiated spontaneous and function-related pain and determine the quality of pain. The questions also asked about sharpness and aching, sensitivity to touch, details about pain when talking, eating or drinking, and interference with function. 

Researchers collected preoperative cervical nodal status from physical examination notes and radiology reports, and postoperative cervical nodal status from pathology reports. Inclusion criteria included diagnosis of an oral squamous cell carcinoma, planned curative resection, and completion of the PQ within six weeks of surgery. Exclusion criteria included prior chemo- or radiation therapy for cancer, failure to complete or understand the questionnaire, and less than one year post-surgery follow up.  A total of 66 patients (35 node negative and 31 node positive) met the inclusion criteria, and higher pain scores were reported by patients with node-positive cancers, as opposed to node-negative.  

The researchers concluded their results showed that pain assessed prior to surgery could identify patients with occult metastases who would benefit from neck dissection. 

 

 

Filed Under: Online Exclusives

You Might Also Like:

  • Elective Neck Dissection Indicated in Patients Undergoing Salvage Laryngectomy
  • Elective Neck Dissection May Be Beneficial in Predicting Occult Metastasis
  • What Is the Role of Elective Neck Dissection in Mucoepidermoid Carcinoma?
  • When Is Prophylactic Neck Dissection in Papillary Thyroid Cancer Necessary?

The Triological SocietyENTtoday is a publication of The Triological Society.

Polls

Where should ENT publications draw the line on authors' use of generative AI?

View Results

Loading ...
  • Polls Archive

Top Articles for Residents

  • Rhinology’s Persistent Gender Gap
  • The Example We Set: Thoughts on the End of Residency Training
  • Is the SLOR in Otolaryngology Residency Applications Contributing to Rural Disparities?
  • Applications Open for Resident Members of the ENTtoday Editorial Board: Deadline Extended
  • A Resident’s View of AI in Otolaryngology
  • Popular this Week
  • Most Popular
  • Most Recent
    • The Dramatic Rise in Tongue Tie and Lip Tie Treatment
    • Empty Nose Syndrome: Physiological, Psychological, or Perhaps a Little of Both?
    • History of the Cochlear Implant
    • Rating Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Severity: How Do Two Common Instruments Compare?
    • Otolaryngologists Are Still Debating the Effectiveness of Tongue Tie Treatment
    • The Dramatic Rise in Tongue Tie and Lip Tie Treatment
    • Rating Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Severity: How Do Two Common Instruments Compare?
    • Is Middle Ear Pressure Affected by Continuous Positive Airway Pressure Use?
    • Otolaryngologists Are Still Debating the Effectiveness of Tongue Tie Treatment
    • Complications for When Physicians Change a Maiden Name
    • ENTs Urged to Look Beyond Refractory Sinus Disease for Underlying Immune Deficiency
    • When a “Blocked Ear” Isn’t Obstructive ETD
    • What Does It Mean to Be Written by a Human?
    • Reevaluating the CMS 90-Day CPAP Adherence Requirement: Persistent Use Among Early Nonadherent Patients
    • Vocal Outcomes After COVR in Porcine Bilateral Vocal Fold Resection

Follow Us

  • Contact Us
  • About Us
  • Advertise
  • The Triological Society
  • The Laryngoscope
  • Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use
  • Cookies

Wiley

Copyright © 2026 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc. All rights reserved, including rights for text and data mining and training of artificial technologies or similar technologies. ISSN 1559-4939