• Home
  • Practice Focus
    • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
    • Head and Neck
    • Laryngology
    • Otology/Neurotology
    • Pediatric
    • Rhinology
    • Sleep Medicine
    • How I Do It
    • TRIO Best Practices
  • Business of Medicine
    • Health Policy
    • Legal Matters
    • Practice Management
    • Tech Talk
    • AI
  • Literature Reviews
    • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
    • Head and Neck
    • Laryngology
    • Otology/Neurotology
    • Pediatric
    • Rhinology
    • Sleep Medicine
  • Career
    • Medical Education
    • Professional Development
    • Resident Focus
  • ENT Perspectives
    • ENT Expressions
    • Everyday Ethics
    • From TRIO
    • The Great Debate
    • Letter From the Editor
    • Rx: Wellness
    • The Voice
    • Viewpoint
  • TRIO Resources
    • Triological Society
    • The Laryngoscope
    • Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology
    • TRIO Combined Sections Meetings
    • COSM
    • Related Otolaryngology Events
  • Search

Pay for Performance: What’s Next?

by Marlene Piturro, PhD, MBA • October 1, 2006

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
Print-Friendly Version

Like it or not, AAO–HNS leaders are meeting P4P’s challenge with a task force first convened in June to define appropriate metrics for the specialty. Amy Chen, MD, MPH, Assistant Professor of Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery at Emory University School of Medicine and a task force member, says that each of about 12 to 15 subspecialty groups submitted evidence-based outcome measures for the Academy’s consideration at a September meeting. “We will then look at these 24 or so recommendations and pick two to submit to the Academy as possible P4P guidelines,” says Dr. Chen. Then again, head and neck surgeons and pediatric and allergy subspecialists may propose their own metrics.

You Might Also Like

  • Pay for Performance: Here to Stay-for the Time Being
  • Can Sharing ENT Performance Bonuses With Staff Pay Off?
  • A Pay Cut by Any Other Name Is Still a Pay Cut
  • Developing Quality Measures in Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery
Explore This Issue
October 2006

As the P4P juggernaut proceeds apace, Dr. Roberson hopes that it is implemented gradually so that payers give physicians sufficient time to adapt. “Give people time to measure accurately and to fix their problems,” he says. He also suggests a sliding scale if physicians miss absolute numeric targets by minuscule amounts, a result of random variation. Withholding incentives because of wobbly statistics could unnecessarily penalize physicians. Ultimately, P4P is a physician’s judgment call. If, for example, Medicare automatically deducts 2% from its reimbursement schedule for physicians unable or unwilling to document their quality measures electronically, physicians will have to decide if compliance is worth it.

—David Roberson, MD

Questions Physicians Should Ask about P4P

  • What external sources will be used to standardize data collection?
  • How can we secure funds for adopting the necessary IT for an electronic medical record?
  • What are the right mix and types of incentives for physician performance?
  • How should an individual physician be held accountable for the chosen metric?

“We will look at these 24 or so recommendations and pick two to submit to the Academy as possible P4P guidelines.”—Amy Chen, MD, MPH

Notes

  1. Bodenheimer T, May J, et al. Can money buy quality? Physician response to pay for performance. Center for Health System Change No. 102, December 2005.
    [Context Link]
  2. Hospitals must overcome physician resistance before P4P can take root. Health Care Strategic Mgt 2006;24(7):1–4.
    [Context Link]
  3. Cognetti D, Reiter D. Editorial commentary: The implications of “pay-for-performance” reimbursement for otolargyngology–head and neck surgery. Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery 2006;134:1036–42.
    [Context Link]

©2006 The Triological Society

Pages: 1 2 3 | Single Page

Filed Under: Departments, Health Policy, Practice Management Tagged With: EHR, electronic health records, healthcare reform, Medicare, outcomes, P4P, pay for performance, pediatrics, policy, Quality, reimbursement, surgeryIssue: October 2006

You Might Also Like:

  • Pay for Performance: Here to Stay-for the Time Being
  • Can Sharing ENT Performance Bonuses With Staff Pay Off?
  • A Pay Cut by Any Other Name Is Still a Pay Cut
  • Developing Quality Measures in Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

The Triological SocietyENTtoday is a publication of The Triological Society.

Polls

Would you choose a concierge physician as your PCP?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...
  • Polls Archive

Top Articles for Residents

  • Applications Open for Resident Members of ENTtoday Edit Board
  • How To Provide Helpful Feedback To Residents
  • Call for Resident Bowl Questions
  • New Standardized Otolaryngology Curriculum Launching July 1 Should Be Valuable Resource For Physicians Around The World
  • Do Training Programs Give Otolaryngology Residents the Necessary Tools to Do Productive Research?
  • Popular this Week
  • Most Popular
  • Most Recent
    • A Journey Through Pay Inequity: A Physician’s Firsthand Account

    • The Dramatic Rise in Tongue Tie and Lip Tie Treatment

    • Otolaryngologists Are Still Debating the Effectiveness of Tongue Tie Treatment

    • Is Middle Ear Pressure Affected by Continuous Positive Airway Pressure Use?

    • Rating Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Severity: How Do Two Common Instruments Compare?

    • The Dramatic Rise in Tongue Tie and Lip Tie Treatment

    • Rating Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Severity: How Do Two Common Instruments Compare?

    • Is Middle Ear Pressure Affected by Continuous Positive Airway Pressure Use?

    • Otolaryngologists Are Still Debating the Effectiveness of Tongue Tie Treatment

    • Complications for When Physicians Change a Maiden Name

    • Excitement Around Gene Therapy for Hearing Restoration
    • “Small” Acts of Kindness
    • How To: Endoscopic Total Maxillectomy Without Facial Skin Incision
    • Science Communities Must Speak Out When Policies Threaten Health and Safety
    • Observation Most Cost-Effective in Addressing AECRS in Absence of Bacterial Infection

Follow Us

  • Contact Us
  • About Us
  • Advertise
  • The Triological Society
  • The Laryngoscope
  • Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use
  • Cookies

Wiley

Copyright © 2025 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc. All rights reserved, including rights for text and data mining and training of artificial technologies or similar technologies. ISSN 1559-4939