• Home
  • Practice Focus
    • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
    • Head and Neck
    • Laryngology
    • Otology/Neurotology
    • Pediatric
    • Rhinology
    • Sleep Medicine
    • How I Do It
    • TRIO Best Practices
  • Business of Medicine
    • Health Policy
    • Legal Matters
    • Practice Management
    • Tech Talk
    • AI
  • Literature Reviews
    • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
    • Head and Neck
    • Laryngology
    • Otology/Neurotology
    • Pediatric
    • Rhinology
    • Sleep Medicine
  • Career
    • Medical Education
    • Professional Development
    • Resident Focus
  • ENT Perspectives
    • ENT Expressions
    • Everyday Ethics
    • From TRIO
    • The Great Debate
    • Letter From the Editor
    • Rx: Wellness
    • The Voice
    • Viewpoint
  • TRIO Resources
    • Triological Society
    • The Laryngoscope
    • Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology
    • TRIO Combined Sections Meetings
    • COSM
    • Related Otolaryngology Events
  • Search

Pediatric Recurrent Respiratory Papillomatosis: Fighting the Battle of a Rare But Serious Disease

by Rabiya S. Tuma, PhD • October 1, 2006

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
Print-Friendly Version

Andrew F. Inglis Jr., MD, Associate Professor in the Division of Pediatric Otolaryngology at Children’s Hospital & Medical Center at the University of Washington in Seattle, is an outspoken critic of the use of cidofovir in RRP. In an editorial he wrote for The Annals of Otology, Rhinology, and Laryngology last year, Dr. Inglis pointed out that the doses used in RRP treatment lead to systemic drug levels that induced tumors and kidney toxicity in rats during short-term toxicity testing. Twenty percent of the rats in the study developed cancers, despite the fact that the toxicity tests were not the long-term studies typically used to look for cancer formation in animal models. The impact of RRP on some patients is so truly devastating that they would gladly assume the still-theoretical risk of cidofovir-induced human malignancy. On the other hand, the physician should be aware of the results of the animal studies with this drug, and put them in the proper perspective for the patient, he concluded.

You Might Also Like

  • Recurrent Respiratory Papillomatosis: Much Has Been Done, but a Long Road Lies Ahead
  • Promise for Recurrent Respiratory Papillomatosis: Pediatric otolaryngologists have high hopes for the HPV vaccine
  • Recurrent Respiratory Papillomatosis: Researchers Advancing Toward Prevention
  • Vaccination and Medical Advancements Helping to Decrease Recurrent Respiratory Papillomatosis Incidence
Explore This Issue
October 2006

In the absence of a randomized controlled trial, several groups are trying to follow patients treated with cidofovir to determine whether benign warts are converting to precancerous or cancerous lesions at a higher-than-expected rate. For example, Richard J. Smith, MD, Professor and Vice Head of the Department of Otolaryngology at the University of Iowa, and colleagues are collecting pathology samples, treatment data, and HPV type on RRP patients treated in the university health care system. No data are yet available however.

Novel Adjuvant Agents

Farrel J. Buchinsky, MD, PhD

Farrel J. Buchinsky, MD, PhD

In addition to cidofovir and interferon, two other agents look promising in the treatment of RRP: celecoxib, which is a cyclooxygenase (COX)-2 inhibitor, and a novel immune modulatory agent called HspE7. Preliminary data suggest that both agents reduce the severity of disease. Unfortunately, pivotal studies for each drug have been delayed because of a lack of funding.

Researchers at Long Island Jewish Medical Center in New Hyde Park, N.Y., have designed a multicenter randomized placebo-controlled trial to determine whether the use of celecoxib can reduce the frequency of surgery in adult RRP patients. While awaiting NIH funding for the multicenter study, the group is enrolling patients onto the protocol at Long Island Jewish Medical Center itself.

HspE7 is used as a therapeutic vaccine. The drug is a fusion protein linking together a heat shock protein, which should stimulate the immune system, and the HPV-16 E7 protein. (Although the E7 proteins from HPV-16, -11, and -6 are not identical, scientists hypothesize that they are similar enough to induce an anti-HPV immune response in RRP-affected individuals.) In an open-label multicenter trial, Dr. Derkay and colleagues treated 27 pediatric RRP patients with HspE7. Following an initial surgery to remove the papillomas, each patient received three subcutaneous injections of the fusion protein over three months. The primary endpoint of the trial was to determine whether treatment increased the interval between surgeries after the three-month treatment period as compared with the four surgeries prior to HspE7 treatment. The mean increase in duration between surgeries for all patients was 93% following therapy, suggesting that the agent was active in RRP.

Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 | Single Page

Filed Under: Departments, Head and Neck, Medical Education, Pediatric, Practice Focus Tagged With: cancer, diagnosis, HPV, pediatrics, prevention, radiation, research, respiratory papillomatosis, surgery, treatment, tumor, vaccineIssue: October 2006

You Might Also Like:

  • Recurrent Respiratory Papillomatosis: Much Has Been Done, but a Long Road Lies Ahead
  • Promise for Recurrent Respiratory Papillomatosis: Pediatric otolaryngologists have high hopes for the HPV vaccine
  • Recurrent Respiratory Papillomatosis: Researchers Advancing Toward Prevention
  • Vaccination and Medical Advancements Helping to Decrease Recurrent Respiratory Papillomatosis Incidence

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

The Triological SocietyENTtoday is a publication of The Triological Society.

Polls

Would you choose a concierge physician as your PCP?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...
  • Polls Archive

Top Articles for Residents

  • Applications Open for Resident Members of ENTtoday Edit Board
  • How To Provide Helpful Feedback To Residents
  • Call for Resident Bowl Questions
  • New Standardized Otolaryngology Curriculum Launching July 1 Should Be Valuable Resource For Physicians Around The World
  • Do Training Programs Give Otolaryngology Residents the Necessary Tools to Do Productive Research?
  • Popular this Week
  • Most Popular
  • Most Recent
    • A Journey Through Pay Inequity: A Physician’s Firsthand Account

    • The Dramatic Rise in Tongue Tie and Lip Tie Treatment

    • Otolaryngologists Are Still Debating the Effectiveness of Tongue Tie Treatment

    • Is Middle Ear Pressure Affected by Continuous Positive Airway Pressure Use?

    • Rating Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Severity: How Do Two Common Instruments Compare?

    • The Dramatic Rise in Tongue Tie and Lip Tie Treatment

    • Rating Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Severity: How Do Two Common Instruments Compare?

    • Is Middle Ear Pressure Affected by Continuous Positive Airway Pressure Use?

    • Otolaryngologists Are Still Debating the Effectiveness of Tongue Tie Treatment

    • Complications for When Physicians Change a Maiden Name

    • Excitement Around Gene Therapy for Hearing Restoration
    • “Small” Acts of Kindness
    • How To: Endoscopic Total Maxillectomy Without Facial Skin Incision
    • Science Communities Must Speak Out When Policies Threaten Health and Safety
    • Observation Most Cost-Effective in Addressing AECRS in Absence of Bacterial Infection

Follow Us

  • Contact Us
  • About Us
  • Advertise
  • The Triological Society
  • The Laryngoscope
  • Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use
  • Cookies

Wiley

Copyright © 2025 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc. All rights reserved, including rights for text and data mining and training of artificial technologies or similar technologies. ISSN 1559-4939